"Abdul bijur Vallarkodath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please do not mis interpret this, but I think you guys are posting on the
> wrong mailing list. Please take you doubts to #debian or some debian help
> mailing list.
I think you are confusing debian-security with
debian-security-announce.
Hi guys,
Please do not mis interpret this, but I think you guys are posting on the
wrong mailing list. Please take you doubts to #debian or some debian help
mailing list.
There are millions of people subscribed to the security mailing list hoping
to hear about vulnerabilities if someone comes ac
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I read in there that it's preferred to set-up separate partitions for
> mount points such as /tmp, /var/tmp, & /home.
I would recommend to use tmpfs for /tmp and have a MP for /var. On a
Firewall you dont need /home. /usr and / would be RO. If you need
Title: nondepreciable
Jaylin,
MoneyCentral.MSN.com
Doug
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 19:15 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sunday 22 April 2007 01:58, Jim Popovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 20:30 -0500, George P Boutwell wrote:
> > > I don't remember the exact details, but the problem I think revolved
> > > around not being able to
On Sunday 22 April 2007 01:58, Jim Popovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 20:30 -0500, George P Boutwell wrote:
> > I don't remember the exact details, but the problem I think revolved
> > around not being able to properly boot-up since the /tmp and/or the
> > /var/tmp where n
6 matches
Mail list logo
