We hope you get this email and can respond.
Walter referred your email to us as he thought our service would be of value to
you.
we have a home plan prepared for you. The plan is less than your current one
and has more benefits.
We can assist you in your options here:
http://geocities.yahoo.com
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 06:56:17PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:28:17AM +0300, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> >- can a process running vulnerable code be exploited to not show the
> > shared libraries and other non-shared libraries and files it had opened
> > for reading at some
Nick Boyce wrote:
I don't mean to complain - not being a developer I may well not be aware
of some very good reason for it - but the pain that ensues for people
like me, on dial-up links (don't ask ...), when we must download so many
binaries just because something small like kdm has changed,
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Nick Boyce:
For interest, can anyone explain why a problem with kdm leads to the
need to reissue so many KDE packages ?
Security updates a performed on per source package (after all, we need
to ship an updated source package to comply with the DFSG and various
licenses
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:28:17AM +0300, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
- can a process running vulnerable code be exploited to not show the
shared libraries and other non-shared libraries and files it had opened for
reading at some point?
Of course it can. And that's irrelevant to the question at
ha
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 07:23:27PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Indeed. lsof +L1 is currently useless for detecting unlinked libraries.
>
> I've been using lsof | grep "path inode" to detect them for a while now.
> Still, I hope the older, saner lsof +L1 behaviour can be restored s
From: Jim Popovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:55:56 -0400
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Dobbs wrote:
> I'm surprised more people haven't reported these problems. Maybe they
> were ignored because they did resemble the older problem with the
> signi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Dobbs wrote:
> I'm surprised more people haven't reported these problems. Maybe they
> were ignored because they did resemble the older problem with the
> signing key so closely.
I do recall seeing something similar to what you describe, but i
From: "Sam Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:11:30 + (UTC)
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:52:06 -0700, Hedges, Mark wrote:
> But then, I tried apt-get update about 5 minutes later with NO CHANGES
> and got these erorrs:
>
> Failed to fetch
> http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:52:06 -0700, Hedges, Mark wrote:
> But then, I tried apt-get update about 5 minutes later with NO CHANGES
> and got these erorrs:
>
> Failed to fetch
> http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/binary-i386/PackagesI
> ndex MD5Sum mismatch
> [...]
$ host ftp.us.deb
[Dann Frazier]
> Would this help?
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/08/msg00629.html
Getting all packages requiring an reboot to call
/usr/share/update-notifier/notify-reboot-required or touch
/var/run/reboot-required would definitely be a step in the right
direction, and handle kerne
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:39:07AM +0200, Maik Holtkamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just received:
>
> ---cut---
> Subject: CRON-APT completed
>
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> base-config libc6 libc6-dev libfreetype6 libfreetype6-dev libgnutls11
> libperl5.8 libpq3 libsasl2 libsasl2-mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just received:
- ---cut---
Subject: CRON-APT completed
The following packages will be upgraded:
base-config libc6 libc6-dev libfreetype6 libfreetype6-dev libgnutls11
libperl5.8 libpq3 libsasl2 libsasl2-modules locales login passwd perl
p
13 matches
Mail list logo
