Re: Still problems with sendmail updates in Stable (libsasl2)

2006-08-29 Thread Lupe Christoph
On Tuesday, 2006-08-29 at 09:06:46 +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: > I still have dependency problems with the sendmail update on Stable. > I only get libsasl2 2.1.19-1.5sarge1 from security.debian.org while > the sendmail-bin package depends on libsasl2 (>= 2.1.19.dfsg1). > When can one expect to b

When are security updates effective?

2006-08-29 Thread Mikko Rapeli
Files on the file system are updated by the apt[itude] and dpkg. But then what? Most server packages restart the services after upgrades. Most library and desktop application packages don't. Should the local adm take a look at each upgrade and manually check which files changed on the Debian ins

Re: Why is portmap installed by default?

2006-08-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"Izak Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 8/26/06, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Never had autoinstalled nfs-common and lpr... > > Those are definitly installed by default, at least in stable, or it > was installed the last time I installed stable. IIRC so is > nfs-kernel-se

Still problems with sendmail updates in Stable (libsasl2)

2006-08-29 Thread Lupe Christoph
Hi! I still have dependency problems with the sendmail update on Stable. I only get libsasl2 2.1.19-1.5sarge1 from security.debian.org while the sendmail-bin package depends on libsasl2 (>= 2.1.19.dfsg1). When can one expect to be able to install the sendmail update? Thank you, Lupe Christoph --