Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1150-1] New shadow packages fix privilege escalation

2006-08-13 Thread dann frazier
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 09:11:16PM +0200, Steffen Hoffmann wrote: > Hello, > > just a question: I can't find a package by this name "shadow". So > what's this all about? That's the source package name - if you look towards the end of the advisory you'll see a list of binary packages that are buil

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1150-1] New shadow packages fix privilege escalation

2006-08-13 Thread Steffen Hoffmann
Hello, just a question: I can't find a package by this name "shadow". So what's this all about? Greetings Steffen Hoffmann Martin Schulze, 12.08.2006 18:50: > -- > Debian Security Advisory DSA 1150-1[EMA

Re: chkrootkit sniffers

2006-08-13 Thread Lothar Ketterer
Hi, > It remains strange because normally, lo is a non-broadcast interface. Maybe it would help to know how Henri has his network configured. Mine is configured with ifupdown, /etc/network/interfaces looks like this: auto lo eth0 iface lo inet loopback iface eth0 inet dhcp and chkrootkit (vers

Re: chkrootkit sniffers

2006-08-13 Thread Christian Schuerer
On Sunday 13 August 2006 23:38, Nicolas Haller wrote: > It remains strange because normally, lo is a non-broadcast interface. With version 0.46 it get this result: Checking `sniffer'... lo: not promisc and no packet sniffer sockets lan: PACKET SNIFFER(/sbin/dhclient3[6515]) Maybe it's just becau

Re: chkrootkit sniffers

2006-08-13 Thread Nicolas Haller
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:40:24AM +0200, Izak Burger wrote: > On 8/11/06, Christian Schuerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Isn't it strange that there is an DHCP client running on lo? I don't get > >the > >point of doing that. > The pid is the same for all three (29184), so it is obviously a > p