On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:06:23AM +, Bastian Blank wrote:
> If you want to be correct, you can't use linux-source. So the security
> team have to support another kernel source.
A kernel-patch package that applies on top of the kernel team's
linux-source is the approach I'd suggest. But to rei
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How big is the patchset these days, and what does it touch? I haven't
> messed with Lustre since 2.4.20 where the core patches were mostly
> adding intents, etc - stuff that I thought had been merged upstream in
> 2.6.
There still is a lot of patching in
I will be out of the office starting 2006-07-31 and will not return until
2006-08-27.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:59:43PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Now to my question. Lustre needs a specialy patched kernel
Why? Ah I see, they don't know how to abstract that and get informations
how to do that properly from upstream.
>
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Schulze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Security Announcements"
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 8:46 AM
Subject: [SECURITY] [DSA 1135-1] New libtunepimp packages fix arbitrary code
execution
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -
5 matches
Mail list logo
