Re: INFECTED (PORTS: 600)

Do you get any unusual report with rkhunter? chkrootkit has given me many false positives...I can remember false +'s when portsentry or tiger were running. On Thu, May 18, 2006 6:17 am, Morgan Walker said: > Hey guys, > > > > Just new to this mailing list, hope you guys can help me out. I was >

Re: INFECTED (PORTS: 600)

--On May 18, 2006 9:17:09 AM -0400 Morgan Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey guys, Just new to this mailing list, hope you guys can help me out. I was testing out the chkrootkit package on one of my debian boxes. After running ‘chkrootkit –q’ I received the following output: Use ls

Re: password minimum days problem

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:39:25PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So how to have PASS_MIN_DAYS set but to allow/require the new user to change his password on the first login? Use passwd -e to force the user to change his password. Mike Stone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

password minimum days problem

Here's the issue. If PASS_MIN_DAYS is set to some value in /etc/login.defs, this defines the minimum number of days a user must keep the same password. This is intended to prevent "password cycling". "Password cycling" is when a password history is used and the new password is required to be dif

Re: INFECTED (PORTS: 600)

On Thursday 18 May 2006 14:17, Morgan Walker wrote: > running 'chkrootkit -q' I received the following output: > INFECTED (PORTS: 600) > udp0 0 0.0.0.0:600 0.0.0.0:* > 2120/rpc.statd > never really get a definitive answer. Is this a common message for > chkrootkit, sho

INFECTED (PORTS: 600)

Hey guys,   Just new to this mailing list, hope you guys can help me out.  I was testing out the chkrootkit package on one of my debian boxes.  After running ‘chkrootkit –q’ I received the following output:   INFECTED (PORTS:  600)   I looked further into and narrowed down to this.  ‘