I am using sarge, for which the folloiwing was issued:
Debian Security Advisory DSA 1018-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following matrix lists additional packages that were rebuilt for
compatability with or to take advantage of this update:
This does not include alsa-modules.
Th
subscribe
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:29:01AM -0500, Deepak Goel wrote:
>> (sarge)
>>
>> Is the k7 package incorrectly uploaded by any chance?
>
> The Packages file looks fine to me..
>
> Do you have kernel-image-2.6-k7 installed? The updated version
> of this pac
Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>> Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for
>> whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same
>> result.
>
> We tried to reproduc
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 03:53:03PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for
> whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same
> result.
We tried to reproduce the bug with zobel, and finally discovered the Tr
* Stephen Gran [Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:45:52 +]:
> This one time, at band camp, Emmanuel Halbwachs said:
> > /etc/cron.d/sendmail has been tailored to our needs and has been
> > reverted to a standard Debian one by the upgrade.
> > Very sorry for the noise and thanks for your collaboration.
>
All seems ok here.
Can you be more specific about the problems you are having?
Hans.
Le vendredi 24 mars 2006 à 18:31 +0100, Emmanuel Halbwachs a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> We are experiencing problems after the sendmail security upgrade on
> our mailhost.
>
> - do some other people out there are ex
This one time, at band camp, Emmanuel Halbwachs said:
> Hello again,
>
> Emmanuel Halbwachs a écrit (Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 06:57:43PM +0100) :
> > - after the upgrade : in some cases (more on this below), incoming
> > mail goes to /var/spool/mqueue/daily and is stuck there
>
> OK, the problem wa
Hello again,
Emmanuel Halbwachs a écrit (Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 06:57:43PM +0100) :
> - after the upgrade : in some cases (more on this below), incoming
> mail goes to /var/spool/mqueue/daily and is stuck there
OK, the problem was on our side:
/etc/cron.d/sendmail has been tailored to our needs
Hans a écrit (Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:38:01PM -0500) :
> Can you be more specific about the problems you are having?
I am not the guy who administer the mailhost, but I just talk to my
fellow postmaster. I'll try:
- the sendmail config uses 6 queues: in, out, in.hourly, out.hourly,
in.daily, ou
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:38:40PM -0500, Chris Hilts wrote:
If you can find a .deb of the package version you want, something like:
dpkg --force-downgrade --install sendmail-whatever.deb
should do the trick. Be aware that forcing a downgrade doesn't check
for dependencies on the newer, replac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emmanuel Halbwachs wrote:
> We are experiencing problems after the sendmail security upgrade on
> our mailhost.
What sort of problems, exactly?
> - is there a way to downgrade the sendmail packages to the previous
> version before the security fix
Hello,
We are experiencing problems after the sendmail security upgrade on
our mailhost.
- do some other people out there are experiencing some troubles after
this upgrade ?
- is there a way to downgrade the sendmail packages to the previous
version before the security fix ? (i. e. something
Hello,
dann frazier a écrit (Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:18:19AM -0700) :
> The Packages file looks fine to me..
>
> Do you have kernel-image-2.6-k7 installed? The updated version
> of this package should pull in the kernel-image-2.6.8-3-k7 update.
I am in this configuration.
> Try explicitly runn
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 15:53 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> If noone minds we reupload tar with a bumped version number to s-p-u.
Ok with me.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 10:00:11AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> For those running a Sparc with 2.4 kernel, it doesn't look like the
> metapackages "kernel-image-2.4-sparc{32,64}{,-smp}" have been updated
> correctly for Sarge -- they still de
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:29:01AM -0500, Deepak Goel wrote:
> (sarge)
>
> Is the k7 package incorrectly uploaded by any chance?
The Packages file looks fine to me..
Do you have kernel-image-2.6-k7 installed? The updated version
of this package should pull in the kernel-image-2.6.8-3-k7 update.
(sarge)
Is the k7 package incorrectly uploaded by any chance?
As a comparison, I successfully upgraded kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686 on
another machine.
But on this machine, the k7 one does not upgrade. I have now waited
one day to make sure this is not due to mirror waiting times (and i
didn't forg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For those running a Sparc with 2.4 kernel, it doesn't look like the
metapackages "kernel-image-2.4-sparc{32,64}{,-smp}" have been updated
correctly for Sarge -- they still depend upon the old 2.4.27-2 packages.
As I've just found out, you'll need to up
Hi mollo,
On Sunday, 19 Mar 2006, you wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:19:58 +0100
> using tar 1.14-2.1
>
> fw:/home/mathieu# tar --rmt-command=/usr/sbin/rmt -cvf
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mathieu/test.tgz' /etc tar:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mathieu/test.tgz: Cannot open: Input/output
> error ta
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 11:39 +0100, Éric Magnien wrote:
> What's the difference between 2.4.27-2 and 2.4.27-3 versions? Should I
> explicitly choose one of these kernels or should I rely on
> kernel-image-2.4-586tsc?
This update introduces a change in the kernel's binary interface, the
af
Hi!
I can't find any update for this version of kernel-image (2.4.27-2).
kernel-image-2.4-586tsc is installed on my system, which should trigger
latest updates about linux kernel. This package depends on
2.4.27-2-586tsc. The last security update contains 2.4.27-3-586tsc,
which is a new packa
Is there anybody having a time-machine?
(March 26th, 2006http://www.debian.org/security/faq
Best regards,
Heinrich Wempe
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Moritz Muehlenhoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 24. März 2006 07:48
An: debian-security-ann
23 matches
Mail list logo
