unsubscribe
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:32:15AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> As many of you are probably aware, CVE has changed the naming of their
> id's: the temporary "CAN-" prefix has been dropped and an id is now
> always of the form CVE--. More information at the CVE website.
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Wouldn't one of the goals of the change to just one name instead of two
> per issue be to facilitate things like googling, grepping and other
> searching on CVE id's? Then it would make sense to unify the names as
> widely as possibe.
It's not worth worrying about doing, u
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Wouldn't one of the goals of the change to just one name instead of two
> per issue be to facilitate things like googling, grepping and other
> searching on CVE id's? Then it would make sense to unify the names as
> widely as possibe.
Those issues are ol
* Thijs Kinkhorst:
>> You could change them retroactively (with a little note that you did so),
>> but it's not strictly necessary, as MITRE will continue to provide referrals
>> from CAN-based entries to CVE-based entries.
>
> Wouldn't one of the goals of the change to just one name instead of tw
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:36 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Are there any thoughts on changing changelogs retroactively? Might it
> > even be an idea to add a lintian check for 'old-style' CAN id's?
>
> You could change them retroactively (with a little note that you did so),
> but it's not s
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.security, you wrote:
> As many of you are probably aware, CVE has changed the naming of their
> id's: the temporary "CAN-" prefix has been dropped and an id is now
> always of the form CVE--. More information at the CVE website.
>
> I was wondering what to do wit
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 11:32:15AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
I was wondering what to do with changelogs. I think it might make sense
to rename CAN-... numbers in old entries to CVE-..., since all entries
have been renamed and this aids to the goal: having one unique string to
find any vulnera
Hello people,
As many of you are probably aware, CVE has changed the naming of their
id's: the temporary "CAN-" prefix has been dropped and an id is now
always of the form CVE--. More information at the CVE website.
I was wondering what to do with changelogs. I think it might make sense
t
9 matches
Mail list logo