Re: SELinux

2005-09-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[David Pastern] > Interesting question. Sadly, for a long, long while, the > development process of Debian has been slower than a dead snail > nailed to the floor. As a participant in that process, I have not had that experience. > The inability, or indecision to actually include new technologi

Re: SELinux

2005-09-21 Thread David Pastern
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 04:40 +1000, Arvind Autar wrote: > Helllo, > > I have been using debian for quite some time now, how ever I have > watched several distrobutions implentating so many great ideas, and I > have been wondering why such a robust distorbution as debian > GNU/Linux(*) hasn't done

Re: SELinux

2005-09-21 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Arvind Autar wrote: > is no loss of functionality, why hasn't debian implented SELinux as > default? It is not that simple. We are doing it slowly. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the L

SELinux

2005-09-21 Thread Arvind Autar
Helllo, I have been using debian for quite some time now, how ever I have watched several distrobutions implentating so many great ideas, and I have been wondering why such a robust distorbution as debian GNU/Linux(*) hasn't done this. One of them is: SELinux If SELinux is also suitable for desk

security.debian.org mirrors?

2005-09-21 Thread Michael Loftis
Are there any official mirrors yet? Esp. mirrors that allow rsync? security.debian.org h as been abysmally slow for atleast a month here and so I'm now forced to setup a local mirror, except I can't rsync the main mirror at all (max connections limit error message). Any suggestions? Yes I se