Re: debian security archive/updates b0rken???

On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 12:31:23AM -0400, sean finney wrote: > please excuse this blatant cross-posting, i wouldn't do it if i didn't > think it were critical that i do so... > http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/log/?200506142140 > say it isn't so! It isn't so. It's true that the design of sbuild/wa

debian security archive/updates b0rken???

please excuse this blatant cross-posting, i wouldn't do it if i didn't think it were critical that i do so... http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/log/?200506142140 say it isn't so! to put this in perspective, i'm currently involved with fixing a remotely exploitable vulnerability, which upstream (and

Penis enhancement patch, doctor approved and recommended.

Experience more powerful orgasms http://www.bateko.com/ss/ He grounds the warship he walks on. The longer I live the more beautiful life becomes. Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true. A friend might well be reckoned the masterpiece of nature. It is characte

Re: safety of encrypted filesystems

also sprach Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.18.0253 +0200]: > have you unmounted the file before writing to it? perhaps you > changes was overwritten with the blok from cache Yes. And my simulated broken blocks were still there after checking the integrity and unmounting again. -- P

Re: Security Support by the Security-Team

Hi! Just a few remarks: << Use unstable or testing, and apply security fixes yourself. Over To my opinion this is a bad suggestion. Maybe my last mail was a bit unclear about this. As security is a process rather than a state, your systems will hardly ever have all the available security-patch