Title: Sie suchen Geschäftskontakte in Europa? Wir stellen diese Kontakte für Sie her!
Guten Tag, debian-security@lists.debian.org Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005 Unsere Werbeagentur möchte Sie
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:52:17AM -0500, David Mandelberg wrote:
> I'm just suggesting that it should be harder for them to shoot
> themselves in the foot i.e. by making .desktop's have the x bit before
> they can be launched.
I strongly agree. No, I STRONGLY agree!
If they are to be marked exe
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> I hope that I am not the only one who writes to the auto-ackers and
> their postmasters that they're using stupid MUAs not honoring
> Precedence: bulk
> or
> Precedence: junk
> as well as the other list-control fields as a flags to not auto-respon
Martin Schulze wrote:
> For the unstable distribution (sid) these problems have been fixed in
> version 1.30.1-5.
A day later and unstable still has 1.30.1-4.2 and I see no 1.30.1-5 in
incoming. Did the upload go missing?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting David Mandelberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>
>>You also asked a question about something I didn't say (I said that
>>the person had to open it).
>
>
> Actually, no, you didn't. (Presumably you intended to, though.)
>
> Your question spoke of "opening" a particularly-na
Incoming from Florian Weimer:
> * s. keeling:
>
> > People who don't use stupid Windows email clients have no trouble with
> > attachments at all. Attachments are a very useful tool; for instance,
> > for code listings, they arrive unmangled by line wrap.
> >
> > Get a better email client, runnin
Quoting David Mandelberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> You also asked a question about something I didn't say (I said that
> the person had to open it).
Actually, no, you didn't. (Presumably you intended to, though.)
Your question spoke of "opening" a particularly-named attachment: You
left unstated
Quoting Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
> kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
Perhaps you need assistance comprehending the word "specific" (used
twice in my question)? I await with interest your achieving that
rar
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:29:46PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
For complex file formats, there is no clear distinction between
"opening" a file and "executing" it.
Sure there is. For some filetypes execution is an intended effect; that
is, you expect arbitrary code to run. For other filetypes ther
* Florent Rougon:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
>> kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
>
> Could you point out a mailcap entry that causes the file to be
> *executed*?
For complex file formats, there is
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
> kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
Could you point out a mailcap entry that causes the file to be
*executed*?
Because running "gqview $file.jpg" is very different from runni
Don Hayward at pomobuli.net
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Martin Schulze wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --
Debian Security Advisory DSA 636-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.deb
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 12:49:57PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Rick Moen:
>
> > Please advise this mailing list of which specific Linux or BSD MUA (or
> > specific configuration thereof) is willing to execute a received
> > binary or script attachment.
>
> mutt and Gnus are, in typical confi
Le Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:41:00AM +0100, Martin Schulze a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> - --
> Debian Security Advisory DSA 644-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.debian.org/s
* Rick Moen:
> Please advise this mailing list of which specific Linux or BSD MUA (or
> specific configuration thereof) is willing to execute a received
> binary or script attachment.
mutt and Gnus are, in typical configurations. Most distributions
kindly add all these helpful mailcap entries.
* s. keeling:
> People who don't use stupid Windows email clients have no trouble with
> attachments at all. Attachments are a very useful tool; for instance,
> for code listings, they arrive unmangled by line wrap.
>
> Get a better email client, running on a better OS.
You mean the OS whose use
s. keeling wrote:
> No, I assume people have half a brain in their heads, look at the
> attachment type, maybe save it to a file and inspect it, then maybe
> look at it or delete it. Too much work?
Whether it's too much work or not, most non-geeks I know don't bother.
> Okay, slap a lot of autoloa
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting David Mandelberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>
>>Attached.
>>
>>Save to your GNOME/KDE desktop (like many newbies do) and double click
>>the new icon. .desktop files (currently) don't need the x bit set to
>>work, so no chmod'ing is necessary.
>
>
> I'm sorry, but the ques
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 10.15, Adam Lydick wrote:
> Better to bounce or moderate entries from non-subscribers, IMOHO. That
> would cut down on the spam quite a lot better than probabilistic filters
> as well.
Problem: moderating needs manpower.
Problem: closing the list to non-subscribers wou
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 12:40 +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With web-board passwords and two or three auto-acks being posted to this
> list every week: could we think about setting the Reply-To of
I hope that I am not the only one who writes to the auto-ackers and
their postmasters that
Better to bounce or moderate entries from non-subscribers, IMOHO. That
would cut down on the spam quite a lot better than probabilistic filters
as well.
There are probably reasons why this hasn't been done, although most
non-debian mailing lists seem to take this approach (and see none of the
nois
Quoting s. keeling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The problem here is the nitwit factor.
Yes, well, a bunch of us have been keeping an eye on Linux MUAs and
default mailcap behaviour for 10+ years, to make sure zeal for
simplicity doesn't lead coders or distro assemblers to do something
dumb. Thus my qu
23 matches
Mail list logo
