Re: [SECURITY] [DSA-594-1] New Apache packages fix arbitrary code execution

2004-12-03 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Adam Morley said: > Hi security and Steve, > > I thought so too. Then I upgraded a box with apache (not apache-ssl) > and apache got ugpraded. . .but I found: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2004/11/msg00095.html > > So I know the things he lists as vuln

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA-594-1] New Apache packages fix arbitrary code execution

2004-12-03 Thread Adam Morley
Hi security and Steve, I thought so too. Then I upgraded a box with apache (not apache-ssl) and apache got ugpraded. . .but I found: http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2004/11/msg00095.html So I know the things he lists as vulnerable are indeed in apache-common (dpkg -x'd the package), b

Re: bad md5's on ftp.us.debian.org ?

2004-12-03 Thread Florian Weimer
> Below are the errors reported by apt-get update. Is this correct? > Could someone explain please? It's normal that large HTTP downloads are corrupted if some router on the path to the server has dying RAM chips. The TCP checksum does not protect against periodic bit errors, and HTTP doesn't c

[OT]Re: unsubscribe

2004-12-03 Thread Raffaele D'Elia
Note: this went from the "tecnical support"... I want to know their customers! It was VERY OT, sorry... -Original Message- From: "Supporto Tecnico Protocomm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:54:30 +0100 Subject: unsubscribe > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

unsubscribe

2004-12-03 Thread Supporto Tecnico Protocomm
Title: Messaggio