On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > But if the majority would use it and they (the spammers) implement
> > queues, it could end in a disaster for them. Or how would you call
> > a queue with millions of messages waiting?
>
> Stupidity, since all messages are deterministical
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Christian Storch wrote:
> I disagree here.
Well, unless there is nobody with a clue working for the spammers, and given
how much money this scum have at their disposal, I find that unlikely...
greylisting IS an one-shot tool.
> But if the majority would use it and they (the s
On Sa, 27.11.2004, 03:43, Stephen Gran wrote:
...
> I guess what I'm trying to say is, I understand your misgivings, beause
> people implementing most anything can manage to do it in a really stupid,
> painful and harmful way. That doesn't necessarily mean the idea is
> unsound. Greylisting is, i
Am Donnerstag, den 25.11.2004, 15:48 +0100 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> For the unstable distribution (sid) these problems have been fixed in
> version 2.0.2-23.
It seems that this currently has not been fixed in the mentioned
version.
After reviewing differences between 2.0.2-14.1 (Adamantix Packa
4 matches
Mail list logo
