This one time, at band camp, Stephen Frost said:
> * Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > A sensible greylisting scheme will auto-whitelist a sending IP after
> > so many whitelisted entries (successful retries) - the only point of
> > greylisting is that we know that the remote end won't re
"s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Incoming from Andreas Goesele:
>> I found the solution. There is a bug in the new package:
>>
>> /usr/share/texmf/web2c does not link to /var/lib/texmf/web2c (as it
>
> Odd. It worked for me (though I haven't tried any LaTeX commands):
>
> (0) keeling /
* Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Stephen Frost said:
> > That's a *terrible* and just plain stupid assumption. Queue size makes
> > a difference to me, both on a machine I run for some friends and in the
> > part-time work that I do for a small ISP (which, h
## Andreas Goesele ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > After the last security update with libkpathsea3 and tetex-bin my
> > LaTeX installation doesn't work any more. When I try to compile a
> > LaTeX file I get:
> > I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!
> > What can I do to get a working LaTeX installat
Incoming from Andreas Goesele:
> Andreas Goesele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > After the last security update with libkpathsea3 and tetex-bin my
> > LaTeX installation doesn't work any more. When I try to compile a
> > LaTeX file I get:
> >
> > I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!
> >
> >
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Andreas Goesele wrote:
> Andreas Goesele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > After the last security update with libkpathsea3 and tetex-bin my
> > LaTeX installation doesn't work any more. When I try to compile a
> > LaTeX file I get:
> >
> > I can't find the format file `latex.fmt
Andreas Goesele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After the last security update with libkpathsea3 and tetex-bin my
> LaTeX installation doesn't work any more. When I try to compile a
> LaTeX file I get:
>
> I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!
>
> What can I do to get a working LaTeX installatio
Hi!
After the last security update with libkpathsea3 and tetex-bin my
LaTeX installation doesn't work any more. When I try to compile a
LaTeX file I get:
I can't find the format file `latex.fmt'!
What can I do to get a working LaTeX installation back? I urgently
need it!
Thanks a lot in advance
Below are the errors reported by apt-get update. Is this correct?
Could someone explain please?
Thanks.
=== 16:35 CST 2004-11-26
Failed to fetch
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
MD5Sum mismatch
Failed to fetch
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sarg
This one time, at band camp, Stephen Frost said:
> * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Friday 26 November 2004 03.34, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And, of course, postgrey as the ve
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 05:21:03PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Current CAN-2004-1010 was fixed on zip 2.30-8 but current sarge
> version still vulnerable. This package need to be included on sarge to
> solve it.
It already has been.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
De
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 05:21:03PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Current CAN-2004-1010 was fixed on zip 2.30-8 but current sarge
> version still vulnerable. This package need to be included on sarge to
> solve it.
zip 2.30-8 is already in sarge:
zip | 2.30-8 | testing | source,
* Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Friday 26 November 2004 03.34, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > > And, of course, postgrey as the very first line of defense.
> > >
> > > Coupled with the usu
Hello,
Current CAN-2004-1010 was fixed on zip 2.30-8 but current sarge
version still vulnerable. This package need to be included on sarge to
solve it.
Thanks in advance,
Otavio
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
George Georgalis schrieb/wrote/a écrit/escribió:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:57:31AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >* Christian Storch:
> >> What about greylisting depending on results of e.g. SA?
> >> Only above a limit of scores from SA greylisting would be become active.
> >This is very impoli
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:57:31AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>* Christian Storch:
>
>>> Things which increase the load on the remote mail servers are *bad*.
>>> That would include responding with temporary errors unnecessairly and
>>> adding unnecessary delays in communication. pipelining by it
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:04:38AM +0100, Christian Storch wrote:
> What about greylisting depending on results of e.g. SA?
> Only above a limit of scores from SA greylisting would be become active.
Use as many RBLs instead of the SA score, but use them not for blocking but
for activating greylist
* Christian Storch:
>> Things which increase the load on the remote mail servers are *bad*.
>> That would include responding with temporary errors unnecessairly and
>> adding unnecessary delays in communication. pipelining by itself isn't
>> necessairly terrible- adding things like 2 minute delay
On Fr, 26.11.2004, 03:34, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>> And, of course, postgrey as the very first line of defense.
>>
>> Coupled with the usual checking on HELO (blocking 'localhost' HELOs and
>> my
>> own IP does wonders!), SMTP p
On Friday 26 November 2004 03.34, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > And, of course, postgrey as the very first line of defense.
> >
> > Coupled with the usual checking on HELO (blocking 'localhost' HELOs and
> > my own IP does wonders
20 matches
Mail list logo
