Re: any DSA for CAN-2004-0930

2004-11-16 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Joey Hess said: > Geoff Crompton wrote: > > Has there been any DSA released for CAN-2004-0930, an Input > > Vulnerability in Samba, 3.0 to 3.0.7. > > Nope, there has not. However: samba (3.0.8-1) unstable; urgency=high * New upstream package. Urgency set to "high

Re: any DSA for CAN-2004-0930

2004-11-16 Thread Joey Hess
Geoff Crompton wrote: > Has there been any DSA released for CAN-2004-0930, an Input > Vulnerability in Samba, 3.0 to 3.0.7. Nope, there has not. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

any DSA for CAN-2004-0930

2004-11-16 Thread Geoff Crompton
Hi, Has there been any DSA released for CAN-2004-0930, an Input Vulnerability in Samba, 3.0 to 3.0.7. Ta -- Geoff Crompton Debian System Administrator StrategicData +61-3-9348-2013 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Who runs the buildds?

2004-11-16 Thread Stephen Frost
* Bernd Eckenfels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Are there any buildds run by non-DDs? Do any non-DDs have access to > > any buildds? > > I think to 99% of all Debian Systems exist physical access for non-DDs. Well, my wife and son (who's, uhm, 2) have

Re: Who runs the buildds? (was: Rebuilding packages on *all* architectures)

2004-11-16 Thread Stephen Frost
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 18:07:43 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow asserted: > > And you are aware of the thread about that buildds are run partly > > by non DDs which can't be trusted and thus the archive is tainted > > by the autobuild debs? > > Is this still

Re: Who runs the buildds?

2004-11-16 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Are there any buildds run by non-DDs? Do any non-DDs have access to > any buildds? I think to 99% of all Debian Systems exist physical access for non-DDs. Greetings Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Who runs the buildds? (was: Rebuilding packages on *all* architectures)

2004-11-16 Thread martin f krafft
[bcc'd to debian-admin] On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 18:07:43 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow asserted: > And you are aware of the thread about that buildds are run partly > by non DDs which can't be trusted and thus the archive is tainted > by the autobuild debs? Is this still the case? < Manoj> madduck: o