Re: [Fwd: [Bulletins] Apache httpd, strongSwan, Openswan, FreeS/WAN ...]

J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: 29.06.2004 : Apache httpd 2.0.49 Apache Input Header DoS Vulnerability http://www.k-otik.net/bugtraq/06292004.Apache.php That page identifies the issue as CAN-2004-0493 which was fixed in sid's apache2 2.0.50-1 packages. (Stable is unaffected as it doesn't have

Re: [Fwd: [Bulletins] Apache httpd, strongSwan, Openswan, FreeS/WAN ...]

> 29.06.2004 : Apache httpd 2.0.49 Apache Input Header DoS Vulnerability > http://www.k-otik.net/bugtraq/06292004.Apache.php That page identifies the issue as CAN-2004-0493 which was fixed in sid's apache2 2.0.50-1 packages. (Stable is unaffected as it doesn't have apache2 packages) > 29.06.2004

[Fwd: [Bulletins] Apache httpd, strongSwan, Openswan, FreeS/WAN ...]

Slt Si pas reçus, l'info // Apache httpd et sinon quoi de neuf If you don't had the information however, - in french :(! - about Apache httpd vulnerability :) ! Scheers Mi --- Begin Message --- -- K-OTiK Securit

Re: Proposal/suggestion for security team w.r.t. published vulerabilities

Could you guys please stop sending cc:s my way? Debian list policy suggests not to do this, and I never requested cc:s. Thank you. -- vbi On Saturday 10 July 2004 17.37, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jeroen van Wolffelaar: > >> Actually, it's rather time-consuming to determine if a security > >> vul