On Sunday 13 June 2004 18.01, Dale Amon wrote:
> What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Just one opinion more:
(ok, this is postfix syntax. But let's not start this war here :-)
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
these are very good and catch
> Also, for Vassilii - you use the SpamCop blacklists. That is something
> that I would be very nervous of. They have some pretty liberal policies
> about what they accept, and their automatic tools are not that great at
> filtering out innocent parties...
>
This is why on the primary MX (which I
On 14 Jun 2004, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
>>> What are the recommended rbl's these days?
>>
>> Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
>> Here's what I am using here RBL-wise:
>>
>> rbl_domains =
On 14 Jun 2004, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
>>> What are the recommended rbl's these days?
>>
>> Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
>> Here's what I am using here RBL-wise:
>>
>> rbl_domains =
Thank you for your request. We will reply to this as soon as possible. Our goal
is to reply the same day as we receive the request.
Your reference number in this case is: HD0. Please use this if you contact us
again in this matter.
Best Regards
Servicon Helpdesk
Thank you for your request. We will reply to this as soon as possible. Our goal
is to reply the same day as we receive the request.
Your reference number in this case is: HD0. Please use this if you contact us
again in this matter.
Best Regards
Servicon Helpdesk
Hello, I have a special_offer for you...
WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT?
The most powerful weightloss is now available
without prescription. All natural Adipren720
100% Money Back Guarantée!
- Lose up to 19% Total Body Weight.
- Up to 300% more Weight Loss while dieting.
- Loss of 20-35% abdominal Fat.
- Redu
Thank you for your request. We will reply to this as soon as possible. Our goal is to
reply the same day as we receive the request.
Your reference number in this case is: HD0. Please use this if you contact us again in
this matter.
Best Regards
Servicon Helpdesk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Thank you for your request. We will reply to this as soon as possible. Our goal is to
reply the same day as we receive the request.
Your reference number in this case is: HD0. Please use this if you contact us again in
this matter.
Best Regards
Servicon Helpdesk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Incoming from no name supplied:
> First off, if you are not Richard Atterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> and you are strapped for time, I'd like to warn you in advance that
Noted.
> On Jun 10, 2004, at 6:10 AM, Richard Atterer wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 12:27:04PM +0300, Dmitry Golubev wrote:
>
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 17:01 +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
> rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
> Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
> about it.
>
> What are the recommended rbl's these days?
>
> --
i like the sbl-xbl lists at
Hello, I have a special_offer for you...
WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT?
The most powerful weightloss is now available
without prescription. All natural Adipren720
100% Money Back Guarantée!
- Lose up to 19% Total Body Weight.
- Up to 300% more Weight Loss while dieting.
- Loss of 20-35% abdominal Fat.
- Redu
Incoming from no name supplied:
> First off, if you are not Richard Atterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> and you are strapped for time, I'd like to warn you in advance that
Noted.
> On Jun 10, 2004, at 6:10 AM, Richard Atterer wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 12:27:04PM +0300, Dmitry Golubev wrote:
>
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:48, Dale Amon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
> > RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
>
> Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
> RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
re-reads the whole doc a second time, rather than
just a
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 17:01 +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
> rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
> Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
> about it.
>
> What are the recommended rbl's these days?
>
> --
i like the sbl-xbl lists at
First off, if you are not Richard Atterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and you are strapped for time, I'd like to warn you in advance that
this email is certified to contain less than ten percent useful
content.
On Jun 10, 2004, at 6:10 AM, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 12:27:04PM +03
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:11, Dale Amon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> > I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
>
> I'd not thought about it because they are still used
> in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
> email
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
I'd not thought about it because they are still used
in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
email Philip about it.
--
---
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 12:54:11PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> > > What are the recommended rbl's these days?
> >
> > Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
> > Here's what I am using he
> You do realize that the osirusoft blacklists are defunct and have been
> for several months, right? Basing your decision of whether or not to
> accept mail from a given host based on an answer from a defunct
> blacklist is probably not a good idea.
*ouch* thanks. I'm revising my blacklists now,
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> > What are the recommended rbl's these days?
>
> Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
> Here's what I am using here RBL-wise:
>
> rbl_domains = bl.spamcop.net/reject :
> relays.osirusof
> I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
> rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
> Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
> about it.
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
> What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-u
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:48, Dale Amon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
> > RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
>
> Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
--
--
Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED]+44-
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'd guess that was easier than fixing all the references to the RBL[+],
> RSS and DUL littered through the documentation.
Point taken... but then again, who on Earth actually
re-reads the whole doc a second time, rather than
just a
First off, if you are not Richard Atterer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and you are strapped for time, I'd like to warn you in advance that
this email is certified to contain less than ten percent useful
content.
On Jun 10, 2004, at 6:10 AM, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 12:27:04PM +0300
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 18:11, Dale Amon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> > I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
>
> I'd not thought about it because they are still used
> in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
> email
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
I'd not thought about it because they are still used
in the examples all over specs.txt. Perhaps I should
email Philip about it.
--
---
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 12:54:11PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> > > What are the recommended rbl's these days?
> >
> > Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
> > Here's what I am using he
> You do realize that the osirusoft blacklists are defunct and have been
> for several months, right? Basing your decision of whether or not to
> accept mail from a given host based on an answer from a defunct
> blacklist is probably not a good idea.
*ouch* thanks. I'm revising my blacklists now,
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 07:46:15PM +0300, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> > What are the recommended rbl's these days?
>
> Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-users or whatever your favourite MTA is.
> Here's what I am using here RBL-wise:
>
> rbl_domains = bl.spamcop.net/reject :
> relays.osirusof
> I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
> rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
> Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
> about it.
I believe it's very old news, smth like 4-5 years or so.
> What are the recommended rbl's these days?
Best thing is ask on NANAE or exim-u
I just noticed that my exim4 config access to
rbl.mail-abuse.org is no longer valid. I'd heard
Vixie had 'gone pro' but hadn't thought much
about it.
What are the recommended rbl's these days?
--
--
Dale Amon [EMAIL PROTECTED]+44-
Hello Martin,
Thursday, June 10, 2004, 12:00:39 PM, you wrote:
MS> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MS> Hash: SHA1
MS> -
MS> --
MS> Debian Security Advisory DSA 517-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS> http://www.de
Hello Martin,
Thursday, June 10, 2004, 12:00:39 PM, you wrote:
MS> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MS> Hash: SHA1
MS> -
MS> --
MS> Debian Security Advisory DSA 517-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS> http://www.de
36 matches
Mail list logo
