We believe ordering medication should be as simple as ordering anything else on the Internet: Private, secure, and easy.
%RND_AD_2
Plus: %RND_ALL_OTHER_MEDS
Free online medical consultation by a licensed U.S. physician.
Begin your savings now..
Use Microsoft Internet Explorer to view the f
We believe ordering medication should be as simple as ordering anything else on the Internet: Private, secure, and easy.
%RND_AD_2
Plus: %RND_ALL_OTHER_MEDS
Free online medical consultation by a licensed U.S. physician.
Begin your savings now..
Use Microsoft Internet Explorer to view the f
Quoting Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Well, it is linked from the www.d-o/security page (at the bottom click
> on woody).
Ah, mea culpa. I'd somehow managed to miss that.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Moen wrote:
| Quoting Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
|
|
|>You should check the website www.d-o/security/nonvulns-woody
|
|
| This extremely useful page[1], unless I'm missing something, appears
to NOT
| be linked from either the Security Team pa
On 5/27/2004, Luk Claes wrote:
> You should check the website www.d-o/security/nonvulns-woody
>
> At least 4 of the 5 you mention are listed there...
Luk -- thank you! Somehow I had no idea that web page existed...
(Still wondering about CAN-2003-0987, but it doesn't look relevant to my
server.
Quoting Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> You should check the website www.d-o/security/nonvulns-woody
This extremely useful page[1], unless I'm missing something, appears to NOT
be linked from either the Security Team page nor the Securing Debian
HOWTO. It deserves to be more prominent. (/me wa
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Luk Claes wrote:
> For the ones on nonvulns-woody there are no fixes necessary of course
> (see the webpage for more details).
>
> CAN-2003-0987 isn't listed in any DSA or nonvulns-woody (yet)
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=230999&archive=yes
Fabio
--
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone tell me the status of the woody Apache 1 packages with respect
> to the following security advisories:
>
> CAN-2003-0993 CAN-2003-0020 CAN-2003-0987 CAN-2004-0174
>
> (There is also CAN-2004-0113 but that only appears r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| Can anyone tell me the status of the woody Apache 1 packages with respect
| to the following security advisories:
|
| CAN-2003-0993 CAN-2003-0020 CAN-2003-0987 CAN-2004-0174
|
| (There is also CAN-2004-01
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me the status of the woody Apache 1 packages with respect
to the following security advisories:
CAN-2003-0993 CAN-2003-0020 CAN-2003-0987 CAN-2004-0174
(There is also CAN-2004-0113 but that only appears relevant to Apache 2?)
These are apparently all fixed in
Quoting Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Well, it is linked from the www.d-o/security page (at the bottom click
> on woody).
Ah, mea culpa. I'd somehow managed to miss that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rick Moen wrote:
| Quoting Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
|
|
|>You should check the website www.d-o/security/nonvulns-woody
|
|
| This extremely useful page[1], unless I'm missing something, appears
to NOT
| be linked from either the Security Team page
On 5/27/2004, Luk Claes wrote:
> You should check the website www.d-o/security/nonvulns-woody
>
> At least 4 of the 5 you mention are listed there...
Luk -- thank you! Somehow I had no idea that web page existed...
(Still wondering about CAN-2003-0987, but it doesn't look relevant to my
server.
Quoting Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> You should check the website www.d-o/security/nonvulns-woody
This extremely useful page[1], unless I'm missing something, appears to NOT
be linked from either the Security Team page nor the Securing Debian
HOWTO. It deserves to be more prominent. (/me wa
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Luk Claes wrote:
> For the ones on nonvulns-woody there are no fixes necessary of course
> (see the webpage for more details).
>
> CAN-2003-0987 isn't listed in any DSA or nonvulns-woody (yet)
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=230999&archive=yes
Fabio
--
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone tell me the status of the woody Apache 1 packages with respect
> to the following security advisories:
>
> CAN-2003-0993 CAN-2003-0020 CAN-2003-0987 CAN-2004-0174
>
> (There is also CAN-2004-0113 but that only appears r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| Can anyone tell me the status of the woody Apache 1 packages with respect
| to the following security advisories:
|
| CAN-2003-0993 CAN-2003-0020 CAN-2003-0987 CAN-2004-0174
|
| (There is also CAN-2004-0113
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me the status of the woody Apache 1 packages with respect
to the following security advisories:
CAN-2003-0993 CAN-2003-0020 CAN-2003-0987 CAN-2004-0174
(There is also CAN-2004-0113 but that only appears relevant to Apache 2?)
These are apparently all fixed in
18 matches
Mail list logo
