On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 01:20:09 +0200,
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:59:36PM -0600, Jones wrote:
>>Positive press for Debian's security team.
>>
>>Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
>>recommendation was "businesses that value quick patch
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 01:20:09 +0200,
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:59:36PM -0600, Jones wrote:
>>Positive press for Debian's security team.
>>
>>Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
>>recommendation was "businesses that value quick patch
Hello,
I'm in the process of building a kernel for a Debian machine being used
as a VPN Firewall.
I need Freeswan 1.99+, MPPE for Poptop, patch-o-matic for pptp masq and
would like GrSecurity for it's chroot and randomized capabilities.
Applying all these patches to 2.4.25 fails with many files
Unbelievable :)Some books are undeservedly forgotten none are undeservedly remembered.
Debian, searching for a source to purchase medication?
When you stop having dreams and ideals -- well, you might as well stop altogether.We've got to have a dream if we are going to make a dream come true.What
Hello,
I'm in the process of building a kernel for a Debian machine being used
as a VPN Firewall.
I need Freeswan 1.99+, MPPE for Poptop, patch-o-matic for pptp masq and
would like GrSecurity for it's chroot and randomized capabilities.
Applying all these patches to 2.4.25 fails with many files u
Unbelievable :)Some books are undeservedly forgotten none are undeservedly remembered.
Debian, searching for a source to purchase medication?
When you stop having dreams and ideals -- well, you might as well stop altogether.We've got to have a dream if we are going to make a dream come true.What
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 17:45, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> When you fetch your mail from your local mailserver you pass it
> through the spam filter, which in turn checks the spam db and ignores
> spam.
Sounds an awful lot like a regular spamassassin install, pull the mail
through the filter whic
no name supplied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mar 28, 2004, at 1:32 AM, Brett Furlong wrote:
> > Got spam though debian security list again...
> [...]
> > is there a way, we can have a human filter all the eMails before they
> > are allowed to be sent to all of us?
>
> When I first read that
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.16
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
hello steve kemp,
this patches allows the user to _really_ write his own
files in ignore.d.violations
previous they had to have the prefix logcheck-,
which isn't handy, not documented and therefor seems to be a bug ..
took some ti
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 17:45, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> When you fetch your mail from your local mailserver you pass it
> through the spam filter, which in turn checks the spam db and ignores
> spam.
Sounds an awful lot like a regular spamassassin install, pull the mail
through the filter whic
no name supplied <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mar 28, 2004, at 1:32 AM, Brett Furlong wrote:
> > Got spam though debian security list again...
> [...]
> > is there a way, we can have a human filter all the eMails before they
> > are allowed to be sent to all of us?
>
> When I first read that
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.16
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
hello steve kemp,
this patches allows the user to _really_ write his own
files in ignore.d.violations
previous they had to have the prefix logcheck-,
which isn't handy, not documented and therefor seems to be a bug ..
took some ti
Subject of the message: take it
Recipient of the message: Kellie Hyland
Subject of the message: take it
Recipient of the message: Kellie Hyland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 03:52:49PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> A better question would be how they determined the applicability of the
> vulnerabilities. This is a non-trivial job even for many individual
> vulnerabilities, and they claim to have surveyed hundreds.
Since they used a vulnera
On Wednesday 31 March 2004 01.22, Jones wrote:
> Michael:
[Jones, please leave attributions in email]
> > That's positive? They put us in the same category as Microsoft! This
> > will lose us some serious street cred. :)
>
> it will lose us some street cred, but an equal amount will be gained on
>
Chad Waters wrote:
> Better metric: fix time from vendor's notification date
The last DSA was released with a delay of 2.5 years...
--
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it,
voila.fr.
17 matches
Mail list logo
