Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sorry, I've been unable to carry out your request,
since the address
debian-security@lists.debian.org
was not on the suse-security mailing lis
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 03:52:49PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> A better question would be how they determined the applicability of the
> vulnerabilities. This is a non-trivial job even for many individual
> vulnerabilities, and they claim to have surveyed hundreds.
Since they used a vulnera
On Wednesday 31 March 2004 01.22, Jones wrote:
> Michael:
[Jones, please leave attributions in email]
> > That's positive? They put us in the same category as Microsoft! This
> > will lose us some serious street cred. :)
>
> it will lose us some street cred, but an equal amount will be gained on
>
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sorry, I've been unable to carry out your request,
since the address
debian-security@lists.debian.org
was not on the suse-security mailing lis
Chad Waters wrote:
> Better metric: fix time from vendor's notification date
The last DSA was released with a delay of 2.5 years...
--
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it,
voila.fr.
--
To UNSUB
Regards
Thomas E. Kamire
Systems Engineer
Kenya Airways Ltd,
P.O. BOX 41010 Nairobi, Kenya
Tel: +254+2+32822311
Cell: +254 722 483 253
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Lets Make Things Better - Together"
-Original Message-
From: Kamire, Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 3
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sorry, I've been unable to carry out your request,
since the address
debian-security@lists.debian.org
was not on the suse-security mailing lis
On Mar 28, 2004, at 1:32 AM, Brett Furlong wrote:
Got spam though debian security list again...
[...]
is there a way, we can have a human filter all the eMails before they
are allowed to be sent to all of us?
When I first read that, it sounded ridiculous, but after a while I
thought "Hey, t
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sorry, I've been unable to carry out your request,
since the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
was not on the suse-security mailing list when I receiv
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sorry, I've been unable to carry out your request,
since the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
was not on the suse-security mailing list when I receiv
Regards
Thomas E. Kamire
Systems Engineer
Kenya Airways Ltd,
P.O. BOX 41010 Nairobi, Kenya
Tel: +254+2+32822311
Cell: +254 722 483 253
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Lets Make Things Better - Together"
-Original Message-
From: Kamire, Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 3
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sorry, I've been unable to carry out your request,
since the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
was not on the suse-security mailing list when I receiv
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 28, 2004, at 1:32 AM, Brett Furlong wrote:
Got spam though debian security list again...
[...]
is there a way, we can have a human filter all the eMails before they
are allowed to be sent to all of us?
When I first read that, it sounded ridiculous, but after a while I
thought "Hey, that mi
Antigen for Exchange found object.doc.com infected with VIRUS= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Norman,NAI,CA(InoculateIT)) worm.
The message is currently Purged. The message, "read it immediately", was
sent from debian-security@lists.debian.org and was discovered in IMC
Queues\Inbound
located at Expedia/ExpeRT
ONLY REAL SUPER VIAGDRA CALLED CIADLIS IS EFFECTIVE! Annual Sale: ONLY $3 per
dose
Check out our website with disscounts and get your fdree bonus pillls
http://litigious.trustdoctors.com/sv/index.php?pid=eph2660
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 05:24:29PM -0600, James Miller wrote:
> > Positive press for Debian's security team.
> >
> > Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
> > recommendation was "businesses that value quick patches look to
> > Microsoft and Debian".
> >
> > Full article at
> >
Antigen for Exchange found object.doc.com infected with VIRUS= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Norman,NAI,CA(InoculateIT)) worm.
The message is currently Purged. The message, "read it immediately", was
sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was discovered in IMC
Queues\Inbound
located at Expedia/ExpeRT/DNXCHCRM02.
Better metric: fix time from vendor's notification date
Eeye says Microsoft has known about some unfixed goodies
since the fall:
http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Upcoming/index.html
-C
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 11:20:02AM +1200, Jones, Steven wrote:
> so MS wins
>
> Though it looks like th
> Positive press for Debian's security team.
>
> Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
> recommendation was "businesses that value quick patches look to
> Microsoft and Debian".
>
> Full article at
> http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1738&e=2&u=/zd/200
40330/tc_zd
> >Positive press for Debian's security team.
> >
> >Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
> >recommendation was "businesses that value quick patches look to
> >Microsoft and Debian".
I figured you guys would get a kick out of that statement.
> That's positive? They put us i
so MS wins
Though it looks like the measurement is public disclosure? to fix time, not
the best metric possiblyso security experts might contact MS weeks when
they find the problem before they publicly comment While it looks like
Linux is its own worst enemy as "we" disclose the probl
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:59:36PM -0600, Jones wrote:
Positive press for Debian's security team.
Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
recommendation was "businesses that value quick patches look to
Microsoft and Debian".
That's positive? They put us in the same category
Positive press for Debian's security team.
Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's recommendation was
"businesses that value quick patches look to Microsoft and Debian".
Full article at
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1738&e=2&u=/zd/20040330/tc_zd/123143
jmb
ONLY REAL SUPER VIAGDRA CALLED CIADLIS IS EFFECTIVE! Annual Sale: ONLY $3 per dose
Check out our website with disscounts and get your fdree bonus pillls
http://litigious.trustdoctors.com/sv/index.php?pid=eph2660
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 05:24:29PM -0600, James Miller wrote:
> > Positive press for Debian's security team.
> >
> > Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
> > recommendation was "businesses that value quick patches look to
> > Microsoft and Debian".
> >
> > Full article at
> >
Better metric: fix time from vendor's notification date
Eeye says Microsoft has known about some unfixed goodies
since the fall:
http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Upcoming/index.html
-C
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 11:20:02AM +1200, Jones, Steven wrote:
> so MS wins
>
> Though it looks like th
> Positive press for Debian's security team.
>
> Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
> recommendation was "businesses that value quick patches look to
> Microsoft and Debian".
>
> Full article at
> http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1738&e=2&u=/zd/200
40330/tc_zd
> >Positive press for Debian's security team.
> >
> >Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
> >recommendation was "businesses that value quick patches look to
> >Microsoft and Debian".
I figured you guys would get a kick out of that statement.
> That's positive? They put us i
so MS wins
Though it looks like the measurement is public disclosure? to fix time, not
the best metric possiblyso security experts might contact MS weeks when
they find the problem before they publicly comment While it looks like
Linux is its own worst enemy as "we" disclose the probl
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:59:36PM -0600, Jones wrote:
Positive press for Debian's security team.
Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's
recommendation was "businesses that value quick patches look to
Microsoft and Debian".
That's positive? They put us in the same category as M
Positive press for Debian's security team.
Using numbers from a pair of metrics, Forrester Research's recommendation was
"businesses that value quick patches look to Microsoft and Debian".
Full article at
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1738&e=2&
Incoming from Costas Magkos:
> On 30/03/04 18:50, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> >I doubt debian-security is the right place for this.
>
> I've tried debian-sparc before posting here, but got no reply. Sorry for
> the inconvenience. :-)
No problem. debian-user would have been appropriate I think. Y
On 30/03/04 18:50, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Costas Magkos:
I am running woody on a SPARCstation 10 with kernel from testing:
# uname -a
Linux foo 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004 sparc unknown
When I run ps I get the following two lines before the actual output.
# ps
I used the backported procps package from backports.org to fix this problem
on a woody i386 system where I was running the backported 2.4.25 kernel. My
guess is that the structure changed somehow.
Don't know if this will help with your Sparc, but it may be a clue...
Denny
> -Original Message
Incoming from Costas Magkos:
>
> I am running woody on a SPARCstation 10 with kernel from testing:
>
> # uname -a
> Linux foo 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004 sparc unknown
>
> When I run ps I get the following two lines before the actual output.
>
> # ps ax
> {iommu_get_scsi_sgl_
Incoming from Costas Magkos:
> On 30/03/04 18:50, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> >I doubt debian-security is the right place for this.
>
> I've tried debian-sparc before posting here, but got no reply. Sorry for
> the inconvenience. :-)
No problem. debian-user would have been appropriate I think. Y
On 30/03/04 18:50, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Costas Magkos:
I am running woody on a SPARCstation 10 with kernel from testing:
# uname -a
Linux foo 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004 sparc unknown
When I run ps I get the following two lines before the actual output.
# ps ax
{
I used the backported procps package from backports.org to fix this problem
on a woody i386 system where I was running the backported 2.4.25 kernel. My
guess is that the structure changed somehow.
Don't know if this will help with your Sparc, but it may be a clue...
Denny
> -Original Message
Incoming from Costas Magkos:
>
> I am running woody on a SPARCstation 10 with kernel from testing:
>
> # uname -a
> Linux foo 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004 sparc unknown
>
> When I run ps I get the following two lines before the actual output.
>
> # ps ax
> {iommu_get_scsi_sgl_
Hi all,
I am running woody on a SPARCstation 10 with kernel from testing:
# uname -a
Linux foo 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004 sparc unknown
When I run ps I get the following two lines before the actual output.
# ps ax
{iommu_get_scsi_sgl_pflush} {___f_mmu_get_scsi_sgl}
Warning:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acknowledgment: I have removed the address
debian-security@lists.debian.org
from the suse-security mailing list. This address
is no longer a subs
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To confirm that you would like
debian-security@lists.debian.org
removed from the suse-security mailing list, please send an empty reply
to this a
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been unable to carrry out your request: The address
debian-security@lists.debian.org
was already on the suse-security mailing list when I rec
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acknowledgment: I have added the address
debian-security@lists.debian.org
to the suse-security mailing list.
Welcome to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please
Hi all,
I am running woody on a SPARCstation 10 with kernel from testing:
# uname -a
Linux foo 2.4.24-sparc32 #1 Fri Jan 30 16:04:55 EST 2004 sparc unknown
When I run ps I get the following two lines before the actual output.
# ps ax
{iommu_get_scsi_sgl_pflush} {___f_mmu_get_scsi_sgl}
Warning: /
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acknowledgment: I have removed the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the suse-security mailing list. This address
is no longer a subscriber.
--- A
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To confirm that you would like
debian-security@lists.debian.org
added to the suse-security mailing list, please send
an empty reply to this addres
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To confirm that you would like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
removed from the suse-security mailing list, please send an empty reply
to this address:
[EM
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been unable to carrry out your request: The address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
was already on the suse-security mailing list when I received
your requ
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acknowledgment: I have added the address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to the suse-security mailing list.
Welcome to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please save this mess
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To confirm that you would like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
added to the suse-security mailing list, please send
an empty reply to this address:
[EMAIL P
55 matches
Mail list logo
