Re: Backporting SELinux to woody

2004-03-09 Thread Russell Coker
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:58, "Milan P. Stanic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ Sorry, I'm not sure if this list is right place to ask this, but > I can't remember better one ] The NSA mailing list is another option, but this one is OK. > I'm trying to backport SELinux tools and libraries from unst

Re: Backporting SELinux to woody

2004-03-09 Thread Russell Coker
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:58, "Milan P. Stanic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ Sorry, I'm not sure if this list is right place to ask this, but > I can't remember better one ] The NSA mailing list is another option, but this one is OK. > I'm trying to backport SELinux tools and libraries from unst

Backporting SELinux to woody

2004-03-09 Thread Milan P. Stanic
Hi! [ Sorry, I'm not sure if this list is right place to ask this, but I can't remember better one ] I'm trying to backport SELinux tools and libraries from unstable to stable (woody). Well, actually I succeed to build all except coreutils and sysvinit and installed all under UML and get to the

Re: mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Jan Lühr
Greetings, Am Dienstag, 9. März 2004 20:54 schrieb Noah Meyerhans: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:53:23PM +0100, Jan L?hr wrote: > > So this is all in all a capacity problem? Doesn't have the debian > > security team enough ressource to port exisiting patches to debian > > packages? Why not enlargin

Backporting SELinux to woody

2004-03-09 Thread Milan P. Stanic
Hi! [ Sorry, I'm not sure if this list is right place to ask this, but I can't remember better one ] I'm trying to backport SELinux tools and libraries from unstable to stable (woody). Well, actually I succeed to build all except coreutils and sysvinit and installed all under UML and get to the

Re: mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:53:23PM +0100, Jan L?hr wrote: > So this is all in all a capacity problem? Doesn't have the debian security > team enough ressource to port exisiting patches to debian packages? > Why not enlarging the team? Anyone with the time and ability can work on a project like t

Re: mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:53:23PM +0100, Jan L?hr wrote: > So this is all in all a capacity problem? Doesn't have the debian security > team enough ressource to port exisiting patches to debian packages? > Why not enlarging the team? You do not need to be a member of the security team to submit

Re: mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Jan Lühr
Greetings, Am Dienstag, 9. März 2004 17:20 schrieb Steve Kemp: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:15:42PM +0100, Jan L??hr wrote: > > over the last months, various security related bugs in mozilla appeared > > and were fixed in new versions of mozilla - but what about the debian > > package? Are there a

Re: mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Jan Lühr
Greetings, Am Dienstag, 9. März 2004 20:54 schrieb Noah Meyerhans: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:53:23PM +0100, Jan L?hr wrote: > > So this is all in all a capacity problem? Doesn't have the debian > > security team enough ressource to port exisiting patches to debian > > packages? Why not enlargin

Re: mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:53:23PM +0100, Jan L?hr wrote: > So this is all in all a capacity problem? Doesn't have the debian security > team enough ressource to port exisiting patches to debian packages? > Why not enlarging the team? Anyone with the time and ability can work on a project like t

Re: mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:53:23PM +0100, Jan L?hr wrote: > So this is all in all a capacity problem? Doesn't have the debian security > team enough ressource to port exisiting patches to debian packages? > Why not enlarging the team? You do not need to be a member of the security team to submit

Re: mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Jan Lühr
Greetings, Am Dienstag, 9. März 2004 17:20 schrieb Steve Kemp: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:15:42PM +0100, Jan L??hr wrote: > > over the last months, various security related bugs in mozilla appeared > > and were fixed in new versions of mozilla - but what about the debian > > package? Are there a

Re: mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Steve Kemp
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:15:42PM +0100, Jan L??hr wrote: > over the last months, various security related bugs in mozilla appeared and > were fixed in new versions of mozilla - but what about the debian package? > Are there any efforts for making mozilla secure or to backport the mozilla > pa

mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Jan Lühr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, over the last months, various security related bugs in mozilla appeared and were fixed in new versions of mozilla - but what about the debian package? Are there any efforts for making mozilla secure or to backport the mozilla patches to

Re: mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Steve Kemp
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:15:42PM +0100, Jan L??hr wrote: > over the last months, various security related bugs in mozilla appeared and > were fixed in new versions of mozilla - but what about the debian package? > Are there any efforts for making mozilla secure or to backport the mozilla > pa

mozilla - the forgotten package?

2004-03-09 Thread Jan Lühr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, over the last months, various security related bugs in mozilla appeared and were fixed in new versions of mozilla - but what about the debian package? Are there any efforts for making mozilla secure or to backport the mozilla patches to

Re: Disk Encryption on bf2.4

2004-03-09 Thread
Thanks to all... 08-03-2004 - Klaus Holler: > On Sunday 07 March 2004 13:13, E&Erdem wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just installed woody on a laptop, and i want to encrypt my > > home directory. > > > > I've searched, but couldn't find kernel patch for bf2.4. Is there a > > patch for this or i have to ch

Re: Disk Encryption on bf2.4

2004-03-09 Thread
Thanks to all... 08-03-2004 - Klaus Holler: > On Sunday 07 March 2004 13:13, E&Erdem wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just installed woody on a laptop, and i want to encrypt my > > home directory. > > > > I've searched, but couldn't find kernel patch for bf2.4. Is there a > > patch for this or i have to ch

subscribe

2004-03-09 Thread Kurdty
. Yahoo! Mail : votre e-mail personnel et gratuit qui vous suit partout ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/ Dialoguez en direct avec vos amis grâce à Yahoo! Messenger !Téléchargez Yahoo! Messenger sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

subscribe

2004-03-09 Thread Kurdty
. Yahoo! Mail : votre e-mail personnel et gratuit qui vous suit partout ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/ Dialoguez en direct avec vos amis grâce à Yahoo! Messenger !Téléchargez Yahoo! Messenger sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com -

Re: setting up iptables

2004-03-09 Thread Glen Mehn
Costas Magkos wrote: Thank you all for the links and hints. What I was really looking for was the debian way of doing things, which I managed to locate in the "Securing Debian Manual" [1]. According to this, the iptables initd script should be used. However, the author/package-maintainer disa