On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:09:09AM +0100, Jan L?hr wrote:
> Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2004 01:10 schrieb Matt Zimmerman:
> ..
>
> > CERT rarely has anything to do with coordinating disclosure, and there is
> > no need to bring them into this discussion at all. The coordination that
> > happens is
Jan Lühr wrote:
> Thus, won't be a little more competition between the vendors better for
> security at all?
What, exactly, is the incentive to release faster (and fewer) security
patches than your competition? There is no significant one, I fear,
even without vendor-sec coordination.
Users ch
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:09:09AM +0100, Jan L?hr wrote:
> Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2004 01:10 schrieb Matt Zimmerman:
> ..
>
> > CERT rarely has anything to do with coordinating disclosure, and there is
> > no need to bring them into this discussion at all. The coordination that
> > happens is
Jan Lühr wrote:
> Thus, won't be a little more competition between the vendors better for
> security at all?
What, exactly, is the incentive to release faster (and fewer) security
patches than your competition? There is no significant one, I fear,
even without vendor-sec coordination.
Users ch
Greetings,...
Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2004 17:11 schrieb s. keeling:
> Incoming from Jan Lühr:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I discovered some strange output of the last command on our Woody
> > Terminalserver (for X11). I have already posted it on debian-user-german,
> > but I didn't get any answer. (I
Incoming from Jan Lühr:
> Greetings,
>
> I discovered some strange output of the last command on our Woody
> Terminalserver (for X11). I have already posted it on debian-user-german, but
> I didn't get any answer. (I hope you don't mind, if I post it for the english
> speaking majority)
> Altho
Greetings,...
Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2004 17:11 schrieb s. keeling:
> Incoming from Jan Lühr:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I discovered some strange output of the last command on our Woody
> > Terminalserver (for X11). I have already posted it on debian-user-german,
> > but I didn't get any answer. (I
Incoming from Jan Lühr:
> Greetings,
>
> I discovered some strange output of the last command on our Woody
> Terminalserver (for X11). I have already posted it on debian-user-german, but
> I didn't get any answer. (I hope you don't mind, if I post it for the english
> speaking majority)
> Altho
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 09:09:24AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
> ... and sometimes people forget to leave urgency at 'high' until the fix is
> really in testing when they upload a new version.
Doesn't make a difference. The testing scripts take into account the
maximum urg
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 09:09:24AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> ... and sometimes people forget to leave urgency at 'high' until the fix is
> really in testing when they upload a new version.
Doesn't make a difference. The testing scripts take into account the
maximum urge
Greetings,
Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2004 01:10 schrieb Matt Zimmerman:
..
> CERT rarely has anything to do with coordinating disclosure, and there is
> no need to bring them into this discussion at all. The coordination that
> happens is between vendors, like Debian, as peers.
>
> Those last two
Greetings,
I discovered some strange output of the last command on our Woody
Terminalserver (for X11). I have already posted it on debian-user-german, but
I didn't get any answer. (I hope you don't mind, if I post it for the english
speaking majority)
Although I hope it is not security related,
On Saturday 21 February 2004 01.14, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
> > Uploads that fix a security hole should have the priority set to high,
> > and this should reduce the transition delay to less than a week [1],
> > shouldn't it?
>
>
Greetings,
Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2004 01:10 schrieb Matt Zimmerman:
..
> CERT rarely has anything to do with coordinating disclosure, and there is
> no need to bring them into this discussion at all. The coordination that
> happens is between vendors, like Debian, as peers.
>
> Those last two
On Saturday 21 February 2004 01.10, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:34:37PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > I think this is the time where I'd like to see some hard data. Which
> > DSA's would possibly have been released differently if such a
> > reorganisation would have bee
Greetings,
I discovered some strange output of the last command on our Woody
Terminalserver (for X11). I have already posted it on debian-user-german, but
I didn't get any answer. (I hope you don't mind, if I post it for the english
speaking majority)
Although I hope it is not security related,
On Saturday 21 February 2004 01.14, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
> > Uploads that fix a security hole should have the priority set to high,
> > and this should reduce the transition delay to less than a week [1],
> > shouldn't it?
>
>
On Saturday 21 February 2004 01.10, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:34:37PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > I think this is the time where I'd like to see some hard data. Which
> > DSA's would possibly have been released differently if such a
> > reorganisation would have bee
18 matches
Mail list logo
