Hi Listreaders,
sorry for the double-post, but after accidently writing my prior email with
the worng subject, and someone noted (PM) that some of you might drop mails
with 'unsubcribe' subject, i do a repost of my message.
Here is what i wrote:
I just found exim's(3) config file in woody is in
Hi Listreaders,
sorry for the double-post, but after accidently writing my prior email with
the worng subject, and someone noted (PM) that some of you might drop mails
with 'unsubcribe' subject, i do a repost of my message.
Here is what i wrote:
I just found exim's(3) config file in woody is in
Am Mi Jan 07, 2004 at 02:0411 +0100 gab Martin Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> von
sich:
> [...]
Ups, worng subject, sorry about that.
--
Regards,| Debian GNU / / _ _ _ _ _ __ __
. | / /__ / / / \// //_// \ \/ /
Martin Helas
Hi Listreaders,
I just found exim's(3) config file in woody is installed with 0644 file
permission by default. This might be okay for standard-installation, but might
that not rise a security bug as soon, as you use either
- client side authentification and have to insert the password there
so
Am Mi Jan 07, 2004 at 02:0411 +0100 gab Martin Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> von sich:
> [...]
Ups, worng subject, sorry about that.
--
Regards,| Debian GNU / / _ _ _ _ _ __ __
. | / /__ / / / \// //_// \ \/ /
Martin Helas|
Hi Listreaders,
I just found exim's(3) config file in woody is installed with 0644 file
permission by default. This might be okay for standard-installation, but might
that not rise a security bug as soon, as you use either
- client side authentification and have to insert the password there
so
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 10:36:28AM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Martin Schulze:
> >
> > - --
> > Debian Security Advisory DSA 407-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.debian.org/security/
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 10:36:28AM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Martin Schulze:
> >
> > - --
> > Debian Security Advisory DSA 407-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.debian.org/security/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Clinging to sanity, Alexander Neumann mumbled in his beard:
> Hi Lupe,
>
> * Lupe Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Comparing the DSAs and reading how mutt recognizes a PGP signed message,
>> I found that only some DSAs from Martin Schulze have
Quoting Lukas Ruf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I assume the keys you try to make use of are for PGP 2.x -- thus they
> require idea. As far as I found on the web, the gpg-idea package
> somehow vanished. See my question I posted five minutes ago.
You probably already realise this, but idea.c is still
2004. január 06. 19:17 dátummal J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) ezt írta:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 19:06:50 +0100, LeVA wrote:
> > But there are not any gpg-idea packages anywhere.
>
> IDEA is patent encumbered in much of Europe, including The
> Netherlands where non-us.debian.org is hosted and apparently Ger
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 19:06:50 +0100, LeVA wrote:
> But there are not any gpg-idea packages anywhere.
IDEA is patent encumbered in much of Europe, including The Netherlands where
non-us.debian.org is hosted and apparently Germany where ftp.gnupg.org is
hosted (AFAIK).
> On the www.gnupg.org sit
2004. január 06. 18:26 dátummal Lukas Ruf ezt írta:
> I assume the keys you try to make use of are for PGP 2.x -- thus they
> require idea. As far as I found on the web, the gpg-idea package
> somehow vanished. See my question I posted five minutes ago.
But there are not any gpg-idea packages an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Clinging to sanity, Alexander Neumann mumbled in his beard:
> Hi Lupe,
>
> * Lupe Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Comparing the DSAs and reading how mutt recognizes a PGP signed message,
>> I found that only some DSAs from Martin Schulze have
Quoting Lukas Ruf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I assume the keys you try to make use of are for PGP 2.x -- thus they
> require idea. As far as I found on the web, the gpg-idea package
> somehow vanished. See my question I posted five minutes ago.
You probably already realise this, but idea.c is still
2004. január 06. 19:17 dátummal J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) ezt írta:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 19:06:50 +0100, LeVA wrote:
> > But there are not any gpg-idea packages anywhere.
>
> IDEA is patent encumbered in much of Europe, including The
> Netherlands where non-us.debian.org is hosted and apparently Ger
> LeVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-06 18:22]:
>
> Hello!
>
> I have installed KMail a few days ago, and with it I've installed the
> GnuPG program too. But some of the signatures can not be read by gpg.
> There are some messages, which has a signature.asc attached, but KMail
> writes this in the m
Hello!
I have installed KMail a few days ago, and with it I've installed the
GnuPG program too. But some of the signatures can not be read by gpg.
There are some messages, which has a signature.asc attached, but KMail
writes this in the messages window:
"The message is signed, but the validity o
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 19:06:50 +0100, LeVA wrote:
> But there are not any gpg-idea packages anywhere.
IDEA is patent encumbered in much of Europe, including The Netherlands where
non-us.debian.org is hosted and apparently Germany where ftp.gnupg.org is
hosted (AFAIK).
> On the www.gnupg.org sit
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:29:41PM +0100, kuene wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 16:57, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:26:12PM +0100, kuene wrote:
> [snip]
> > You are still wrong. What you do not understand is, when you install
> > Debian, you do not have the package "kernel-
2004. január 06. 18:26 dátummal Lukas Ruf ezt írta:
> I assume the keys you try to make use of are for PGP 2.x -- thus they
> require idea. As far as I found on the web, the gpg-idea package
> somehow vanished. See my question I posted five minutes ago.
But there are not any gpg-idea packages an
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> LeVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-06 18:22]:
>
> Hello!
>
> I have installed KMail a few days ago, and with it I've installed the
> GnuPG program too. But some of the signatures can not be read by gpg.
> There are some messages, which has a signature.asc attached, but KMail
> writes this in the m
Hello!
I have installed KMail a few days ago, and with it I've installed the
GnuPG program too. But some of the signatures can not be read by gpg.
There are some messages, which has a signature.asc attached, but KMail
writes this in the messages window:
"The message is signed, but the validity o
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:29:41PM +0100, kuene wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 16:57, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:26:12PM +0100, kuene wrote:
> [snip]
> > You are still wrong. What you do not understand is, when you install
> > Debian, you do not have the package "kernel-
On Monday, 05 January 2004, at 17:21:52 +0100,
Teófilo Ruiz Suárez wrote:
> What about 2.6? Is it fixed anyhow?
>
It seems to be fixed in 2.6.1-rc2, as Linus said. But the fix seems to
be temporary while kernel gurus and the people in charge of libc agree
on a better solution.
http://marc.theaims
On Monday, 05 January 2004, at 17:21:52 +0100,
Teófilo Ruiz Suárez wrote:
> What about 2.6? Is it fixed anyhow?
>
It seems to be fixed in 2.6.1-rc2, as Linus said. But the fix seems to
be temporary while kernel gurus and the people in charge of libc agree
on a better solution.
http://marc.theaims
Rudolf Lohner wrote:
[snip]
file hello.dyn
hello.dyn: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped
file hello.stat
hello.stat: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, statically linked, not stripped
[snip]
Greetings, R
On Montag Januar 5 2004 18:43, Marcel Weber wrote:
> Whatever, I guess during the inital setup of LFS I made a mistake and
> compiled these files statically... This probably explains the size. I do
> not think, that they're belonging to a rootkit, as I have the same files
> on my initial install ba
Rudolf Lohner wrote:
[snip]
file hello.dyn
hello.dyn: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped
file hello.stat
hello.stat: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, statically linked, not stripped
[snip]
Greetings, Rudolf
On Montag Januar 5 2004 18:43, Marcel Weber wrote:
> Whatever, I guess during the inital setup of LFS I made a mistake and
> compiled these files statically... This probably explains the size. I do
> not think, that they're belonging to a rootkit, as I have the same files
> on my initial install ba
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 16:57, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:26:12PM +0100, kuene wrote:
[snip]
> You are still wrong. What you do not understand is, when you install
> Debian, you do not have the package "kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4" installed.
> You have a copy of some of the fi
Hi Lupe,
* Lupe Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comparing the DSAs and reading how mutt recognizes a PGP signed message,
> I found that only some DSAs from Martin Schulze have a Content-Type as mutt
> wants it:
>
> Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign
-> PGP/MIME
>
* Lupe Christoph [Tue, 06 Jan 2004 11:25:27 +0100]:
> When I recently read about problems with verifying the PGP signature of
> DSAs, I realized that for most DSAs mutt does not automatically check
> the signature.
> Comparing the DSAs and reading how mutt recognizes a PGP signed message,
> I fou
unsubscribeFraser Computer Consulting ServicesPC advice - Network Engineering - Network Security - Infrastructure solutionsEmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]Phone 0413 495 4236am -6pm 7 Days a week.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 16:57, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:26:12PM +0100, kuene wrote:
[snip]
> You are still wrong. What you do not understand is, when you install
> Debian, you do not have the package "kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4" installed.
> You have a copy of some of the fi
Hi Lupe,
* Lupe Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comparing the DSAs and reading how mutt recognizes a PGP signed message,
> I found that only some DSAs from Martin Schulze have a Content-Type as mutt
> wants it:
>
> Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign
-> PGP/MIME
>
Hi!
When I recently read about problems with verifying the PGP signature of
DSAs, I realized that for most DSAs mutt does not automatically check
the signature.
Comparing the DSAs and reading how mutt recognizes a PGP signed message,
I found that only some DSAs from Martin Schulze have a Content-
--
Maciek Hofstede
PGP: http://www.demon.pl/max/max.pgp
pgpvrBe1S0uq3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Lupe Christoph [Tue, 06 Jan 2004 11:25:27 +0100]:
> When I recently read about problems with verifying the PGP signature of
> DSAs, I realized that for most DSAs mutt does not automatically check
> the signature.
> Comparing the DSAs and reading how mutt recognizes a PGP signed message,
> I fou
unsubscribeFraser Computer Consulting ServicesPC advice - Network Engineering - Network Security - Infrastructure solutionsEmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]Phone 0413 495 4236am -6pm 7 Days a week.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
Hi!
When I recently read about problems with verifying the PGP signature of
DSAs, I realized that for most DSAs mutt does not automatically check
the signature.
Comparing the DSAs and reading how mutt recognizes a PGP signed message,
I found that only some DSAs from Martin Schulze have a Content-
--
Maciek Hofstede
PGP: http://www.demon.pl/max/max.pgp
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 10:37:49PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Matt Zimmerman:
> > Debian Security Advisory DSA 411-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.debian.org/security/ Matt Zimmerman
> > January 5th, 2004 http:/
Incoming from ZsoL:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 06 January 2004 06.37, s. keeling wrote:
> > Incoming from Matt Zimmerman:
> > > Debian Security Advisory DSA 411-1
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/security/
> > > Matt Zimmerman January 5
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 10:37:49PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Matt Zimmerman:
> > Debian Security Advisory DSA 411-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.debian.org/security/ Matt Zimmerman
> > January 5th, 2004 http:/
Incoming from ZsoL:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tuesday 06 January 2004 06.37, s. keeling wrote:
> > Incoming from Matt Zimmerman:
> > > Debian Security Advisory DSA 411-1
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/security/
> > > Matt Zimmerman January 5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 06.37, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Matt Zimmerman:
> > Debian Security Advisory DSA 411-1
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/security/
> > Matt Zimmerman January
49 matches
Mail list logo
