On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 09:30:04AM +0100, Domonkos Czinke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think you won't have to make a unique jail for ssh, you can use the
> pam module which is designed especially for this. Unfortunately AFAIK
> debian does not support that module, so you will have to compile your
> own pac
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 09:30:04AM +0100, Domonkos Czinke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think you won't have to make a unique jail for ssh, you can use the
> pam module which is designed especially for this. Unfortunately AFAIK
> debian does not support that module, so you will have to compile your
> own pac
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:23:40PM +0200, E&Erdem wrote:
> Hi,
> I didn't find /usr/share/kernel-image-2.4.18-bf.2.4/ also there isn't
> any kernel image folder on my machine (?)
I think he meant to say /usr/share/doc/...
> So i forget all other things
> and installed bf2.4 again (apt-get update
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:45:22AM -0500, Walter Tautz wrote:
> just wondering if this would be a good idea. We currently have
> >80 machines that do an update once a day on this host so
> I think it may be a good idea to mirror the archive locally, say
> once a day via rsync?
The way that I do
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:58:51PM +0100, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Walter Tautz wrote:
>
> > just wondering if this would be a good idea. We currently have
> > >80 machines that do an update once a day on this host so
> > I think it may be a good idea to mirror the archive locall
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:45:22AM -0500, Walter Tautz wrote:
>just wondering if this would be a good idea. We currently have
>>80 machines that do an update once a day on this host so
>I think it may be a good idea to mirror the archive locally, say
>once a day via rsync?
The Nov ?? Deb weekly ne
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:02:49AM +0100, Jean-Francois Dive wrote:
> why do you run that kind of service on a publicly reachable address ?
Well, it wasn't by choice. It came with some K-apps that were
installed. But that isn't the point. It is pretty common. The fact
that there might be an
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:23:40PM +0200, E&Erdem wrote:
> Hi,
> I didn't find /usr/share/kernel-image-2.4.18-bf.2.4/ also there isn't
> any kernel image folder on my machine (?)
I think he meant to say /usr/share/doc/...
> So i forget all other things
> and installed bf2.4 again (apt-get update
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:45:22AM -0500, Walter Tautz wrote:
> just wondering if this would be a good idea. We currently have
> >80 machines that do an update once a day on this host so
> I think it may be a good idea to mirror the archive locally, say
> once a day via rsync?
The way that I do
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:58:51PM +0100, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Walter Tautz wrote:
>
> > just wondering if this would be a good idea. We currently have
> > >80 machines that do an update once a day on this host so
> > I think it may be a good idea to mirror the archive locall
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Walter Tautz wrote:
> just wondering if this would be a good idea. We currently have
> >80 machines that do an update once a day on this host so
> I think it may be a good idea to mirror the archive locally, say
> once a day via rsync?
I have a similar situation and I do mirro
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:45:22AM -0500, Walter Tautz wrote:
>just wondering if this would be a good idea. We currently have
>>80 machines that do an update once a day on this host so
>I think it may be a good idea to mirror the archive locally, say
>once a day via rsync?
The Nov ?? Deb weekly ne
just wondering if this would be a good idea. We currently have
>80 machines that do an update once a day on this host so
I think it may be a good idea to mirror the archive locally, say
once a day via rsync?
walter
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:02:49AM +0100, Jean-Francois Dive wrote:
> why do you run that kind of service on a publicly reachable address ?
Well, it wasn't by choice. It came with some K-apps that were
installed. But that isn't the point. It is pretty common. The fact
that there might be an
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Walter Tautz wrote:
> just wondering if this would be a good idea. We currently have
> >80 machines that do an update once a day on this host so
> I think it may be a good idea to mirror the archive locally, say
> once a day via rsync?
I have a similar situation and I do mirro
just wondering if this would be a good idea. We currently have
>80 machines that do an update once a day on this host so
I think it may be a good idea to mirror the archive locally, say
once a day via rsync?
walter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Domonkos Czinke wrote:
> I think you won't have to make a unique jail for ssh, you can use the
> pam module which is designed especially for this. Unfortunately AFAIK
> debian does not support that module, so you will have to compile your
> own packages. Btw you can switch off the double chroot re
Domonkos Czinke wrote:
> I think you won't have to make a unique jail for ssh, you can use the
> pam module which is designed especially for this. Unfortunately AFAIK
> debian does not support that module, so you will have to compile your
> own packages. Btw you can switch off the double chroot re
Sebastien Chaumat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone explain why testing/Release is signed with the key id :
> 30B34DD5 (which I can't trust because I can't find any valid/trustable
> source for it) whereas non-US/testing/Release is correctly signed with
> ftp-master 2003 key ?
It's the
Sebastien Chaumat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone explain why testing/Release is signed with the key id :
> 30B34DD5 (which I can't trust because I can't find any valid/trustable
> source for it) whereas non-US/testing/Release is correctly signed with
> ftp-master 2003 key ?
It's the
U P O Z O R E N J E - D E T E K T O V A N V I R U S
V I R U S A L E R T
Nas antivirus softver pronasao je | Our viruschecker found the
install.exeinfected: I-Worm.Swen
virus(e) u posti za vas sa adrese: | virus(es) in an email to you
U P O Z O R E N J E - D E T E K T O V A N V I R U S
V I R U S A L E R T
Nas antivirus softver pronasao je | Our viruschecker found the
install.exeinfected: I-Worm.Swen
virus(e) u posti za vas sa adrese: | virus(es) in an email to you
Hi,
Can someone explain why testing/Release is signed with the key id :
30B34DD5 (which I can't trust because I can't find any valid/trustable
source for it) whereas non-US/testing/Release is correctly signed with
ftp-master 2003 key ?
Thanks,
SEb
P.S : sorry if it was ask there before I do n
Hi,
Can someone explain why testing/Release is signed with the key id :
30B34DD5 (which I can't trust because I can't find any valid/trustable
source for it) whereas non-US/testing/Release is correctly signed with
ftp-master 2003 key ?
Thanks,
SEb
P.S : sorry if it was ask there before I do n
24 matches
Mail list logo
