Re: Verisign again...

2003-09-27 Thread wes schreiner
Michelle Konzack wrote: Am 2003-09-27 03:15:30, schrieb Bernd Eckenfels: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: and was on Verisign.com. So Verising catch not only .com and .net, but de and fr too !!! they cant catch .de, but your computer is most likely retrying failed look

Re: Verisign again...

2003-09-27 Thread wes schreiner
Michelle Konzack wrote: Am 2003-09-27 03:15:30, schrieb Bernd Eckenfels: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: and was on Verisign.com. So Verising catch not only .com and .net, but de and fr too !!! they cant catch .de, but your computer is most likely retrying failed lookups

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > But from a server point of view FTP does allow things that HTTP doesnt > easily support - such as limiting the number of simultaneous downloads, > logins. Hmm... authentication can be done with various modules, and for the number of doanload limits, the

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-27 Thread Steve Kemp
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 07:05:53PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > FTP is a firewal nightmare, it is unsecure (plaintext), the more advanced > > features are not standadized. Even parsing the directory output is terror to > > the programmer. > > On my

Re: Verisign again...

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Hmmm, I have in /etc/resolv.conf only > search wanadoo.fr i think the web browser is doing that also. Qualifying names with .com and .net Try to type "microsoft" in the url :) Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire -

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > FTP is a firewal nightmare, it is unsecure (plaintext), the more advanced > features are not standadized. Even parsing the directory output is terror to > the programmer. On my System, running apt-spy on a ADSL Link, from 85 Debian Morrirs which support

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > But from a server point of view FTP does allow things that HTTP doesnt > easily support - such as limiting the number of simultaneous downloads, > logins. Hmm... authentication can be done with various modules, and for the number of doanload limits, the

Re: The same debian - different packages

2003-09-27 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi, On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:24:47AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > My point was refering to the fact that one needs a tool to find those > problems, I know how to fix them :) To find them, try apt-show-versions. Regards, Nicolas

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-27 Thread Steve Kemp
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 07:05:53PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > FTP is a firewal nightmare, it is unsecure (plaintext), the more advanced > > features are not standadized. Even parsing the directory output is terror to > > the programmer. > > On my

Re: Verisign again...

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Hmmm, I have in /etc/resolv.conf only > search wanadoo.fr i think the web browser is doing that also. Qualifying names with .com and .net Try to type "microsoft" in the url :) Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire -

Re: Watch out! vsftpd anonymous access always enabled!

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > FTP is a firewal nightmare, it is unsecure (plaintext), the more advanced > features are not standadized. Even parsing the directory output is terror to > the programmer. On my System, running apt-spy on a ADSL Link, from 85 Debian Morrirs which support

Re: Verisign again...

2003-09-27 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2003-09-27 03:15:30, schrieb Bernd Eckenfels: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> and was on Verisign.com. So Verising catch not only .com and .net, >> but de and fr too !!! > >they cant catch .de, but your computer is most likely retrying failed lookups >with a .com domain added, see

Re: The same debian - different packages

2003-09-27 Thread Nicolas Boullis
Hi, On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:24:47AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > My point was refering to the fact that one needs a tool to find those > problems, I know how to fix them :) To find them, try apt-show-versions. Regards, Nicolas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Re: Verisign again...

2003-09-27 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2003-09-27 03:15:30, schrieb Bernd Eckenfels: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> and was on Verisign.com. So Verising catch not only .com and .net, >> but de and fr too !!! > >they cant catch .de, but your computer is most likely retrying failed lookups >with a .com domain added, see

Re: [SOLVED ?] Re: Versign has hijacked www.xmms.org

2003-09-27 Thread Stefan Gybas
Michelle Konzack wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ > ping www.SLD.org PING: www.SLD.org.verisign.com (64.94.110.11): 56 data bytes It looks like you have a "search" or "domain" line in /etc/resolv.conf that extends your domain lookups to verisign.com or .com. Please remove these lines and try again.

Re: [SOLVED ?] Re: Versign has hijacked www.xmms.org

2003-09-27 Thread Stefan Gybas
Michelle Konzack wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ > ping www.SLD.org PING: www.SLD.org.verisign.com (64.94.110.11): 56 data bytes It looks like you have a "search" or "domain" line in /etc/resolv.conf that extends your domain lookups to verisign.com or .com. Please remove these lines and try again. Is

Re: services installed and running "out of the box"

2003-09-27 Thread Jean Christophe ANDRÉ
Hi *, Matt Zimmerman écrivait : > Having a web server listen on a particular interface should not be > controlled by whether or not a particular package is installed. > It should be controlled by the configuration of the package. What about giving this configuration a default value taken

Re: Verisign again...

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > and was on Verisign.com. So Verising catch not only .com and .net, > but de and fr too !!! they cant catch .de, but your computer is most likely retrying failed lookups with a .com domain added, see the "domain" or "search" option in linux resolver.conf

Re: services installed and running "out of the box"

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > We can see it the other way: why bother the user with the details > of running a service if the clued ones can easily stop or disable > the installed daemons until they are configured properly? We scare because we care. Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat

Re: services installed and running "out of the box"

2003-09-27 Thread Jean Christophe ANDRÉ
Hi *, Matt Zimmerman écrivait : > Having a web server listen on a particular interface should not be > controlled by whether or not a particular package is installed. > It should be controlled by the configuration of the package. What about giving this configuration a default value taken

Re: The same debian - different packages

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> number. Another thing where package build-stamps may help to generate a >> report. > > Then just download the package file manually My point was refering to the fact that one needs a tool to find those problems, I know how to fix them :) Greetings Be

Re: Verisign again...

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > and was on Verisign.com. So Verising catch not only .com and .net, > but de and fr too !!! they cant catch .de, but your computer is most likely retrying failed lookups with a .com domain added, see the "domain" or "search" option in linux resolver.conf

Re: services installed and running "out of the box"

2003-09-27 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > We can see it the other way: why bother the user with the details > of running a service if the clued ones can easily stop or disable > the installed daemons until they are configured properly? We scare because we care. Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat