Hey QqApbfwfotB Debian-security tihAi
0765 166
Hey,
Sorry for the delay.
Been in the same situation before. I couldn't find the place where I got the
setup I have, but here it is: (server=sarge-sid, client=woody)
Xwindow Server(Sid) :
/etc/X11/xdm/Xservers
:0 local /usr/X11R6/bin/X vt7 -nolisten tcp
192.168.0.99:1 foreign
# where 192
On Thursday 21 August 2003 02:20 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Boyd Moore) (Boyd
Moore) wrote:
> I will try to explain again. This is not an urgent problem, but it is
> highly irritating.
>
> I have an older PC running Debian Stable (Woody, 2.2.20). My new PC
> is running Debian Unstable (Sid, 2.4.18-b
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:20:35 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Boyd Moore) wrote:
> I would like for these two Linux systems to completely trust each
> other so I can run remote X (XDMCP), using the KDE3 service on the
> faster, more up-to-date PC, for my window manager on the older PC.
> You cannot do th
Hey,
Sorry for the delay.
Been in the same situation before. I couldn't find the place where I got the
setup I have, but here it is: (server=sarge-sid, client=woody)
Xwindow Server(Sid) :
/etc/X11/xdm/Xservers
:0 local /usr/X11R6/bin/X vt7 -nolisten tcp
192.168.0.99:1 foreign
# where 192
On Thursday 21 August 2003 02:20 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Boyd Moore) (Boyd
Moore) wrote:
> I will try to explain again. This is not an urgent problem, but it is
> highly irritating.
>
> I have an older PC running Debian Stable (Woody, 2.2.20). My new PC
> is running Debian Unstable (Sid, 2.4.18-b
Am Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:23:45PM -0400, Michael Stone sagte:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:59:09PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> >The optimum is rejecting unsolicited mails during the SMTP dialog, this
> >way there will be no bounces to innocent bystanders (as caused by the
> >latest ep
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:20:35 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Boyd Moore) wrote:
> I would like for these two Linux systems to completely trust each
> other so I can run remote X (XDMCP), using the KDE3 service on the
> faster, more up-to-date PC, for my window manager on the older PC.
> You cannot do th
On Don Aug 21, 2003 at 12:5630 +0200, Tarjei Huse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm no expert on handling certificates and I hope not having to learn
> all the commandline switches of openssl by heart. However, I do need a
> simple setup of a CA that I may use for creating selfsigned
> c
I will try to explain again. This is not an urgent problem, but it is
highly irritating.
I have an older PC running Debian Stable (Woody, 2.2.20). My new PC
is running Debian Unstable (Sid, 2.4.18-bf2.4). I am using the latter
for development, and my wife uses it for her e-mail, e-bay, etc.
Bo
Am Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:23:45PM -0400, Michael Stone sagte:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:59:09PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> >The optimum is rejecting unsolicited mails during the SMTP dialog, this
> >way there will be no bounces to innocent bystanders (as caused by the
> >latest ep
On Don Aug 21, 2003 at 12:5630 +0200, Tarjei Huse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm no expert on handling certificates and I hope not having to learn
> all the commandline switches of openssl by heart. However, I do need a
> simple setup of a CA that I may use for creating selfsigned
> c
I will try to explain again. This is not an urgent problem, but it is
highly irritating.
I have an older PC running Debian Stable (Woody, 2.2.20). My new PC
is running Debian Unstable (Sid, 2.4.18-bf2.4). I am using the latter
for development, and my wife uses it for her e-mail, e-bay, etc.
Bo
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:59:09PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
The optimum is rejecting unsolicited mails during the SMTP dialog, this
way there will be no bounces to innocent bystanders (as caused by the
latest epidemic disease).
Not really. If the message goes through intermediate
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:56:30PM +0200, Tarjei Huse wrote:
>
> What are the alternatives besides OpenCA? Does anyone know of a set of
> scipts that are a bit less complex and at the same time gives me some of
> the same functionality?
http://vekoll.saturnus.vein.hu/~borso/ca.tgz
You'll find h
## Guido Hennecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Last modification about two years ago...
> > > As usual never ever take automated action based on a simple thing
> > > like filename or whatever. Sort them to a special mailbox and let a
> > > human look at it.
> > Strongly agreed.
> It is much better to
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:59:09PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
The optimum is rejecting unsolicited mails during the SMTP dialog, this
way there will be no bounces to innocent bystanders (as caused by the
latest epidemic disease).
Not really. If the message goes through intermediate mx h
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:56:30PM +0200, Tarjei Huse wrote:
>
> What are the alternatives besides OpenCA? Does anyone know of a set of
> scipts that are a bit less complex and at the same time gives me some of
> the same functionality?
http://vekoll.saturnus.vein.hu/~borso/ca.tgz
You'll find h
## Guido Hennecke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Last modification about two years ago...
> > > As usual never ever take automated action based on a simple thing
> > > like filename or whatever. Sort them to a special mailbox and let a
> > > human look at it.
> > Strongly agreed.
> It is much better to
Hi,
I'm no expert on handling certificates and I hope not having to learn
all the commandline switches of openssl by heart. However, I do need a
simple setup of a CA that I may use for creating selfsigned
certificates, webpages that clients may use to import the certificates
and also a way to
Hi,
I'm no expert on handling certificates and I hope not having to learn
all the commandline switches of openssl by heart. However, I do need a
simple setup of a CA that I may use for creating selfsigned
certificates, webpages that clients may use to import the certificates
and also a way to
## Pascal Weller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Isn't he saying that if i do the following:
> "hey I get a lot of these document_all.pif recently"
> this message here get filtered?
It's not that easy. You need at leas Content-Type=something and
a matching filename, given in MIME-style (name=...). The now
## Pascal Weller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Isn't he saying that if i do the following:
> "hey I get a lot of these document_all.pif recently"
> this message here get filtered?
It's not that easy. You need at leas Content-Type=something and
a matching filename, given in MIME-style (name=...). The now
23 matches
Mail list logo
