On Monday 30 June 2003 17:22, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> Ideally. whenever someone tries to FTP in as root, ftp, backup, or some
> other administrative account, I'd like iptables to DROP further incoming
> FTP traffic from that address, and an e-mail to be sent automatically to
> me and their network'
Hi,
Do You (We) really surely want to include buggy samba 2.2.3a-12, more than
half year old in 'testing' release?
I already know one guy with a 1 week old 'testing' debian hacked through
samba. (I know, it's -12.3 on security for stable, and samba is not secure at
all, but I think this one needs
Greets all,
A previous post spawned an idea of mine. I am not sure if there is a
project available for this or not. Here we go:
A daemon sits running in the background listening to a special device
(/dev) or an IPC which would originate from syslog-ng. This daemon
would then parse the log and
Or, which I usually prefer, leave the S and K files in their place (so that
you know where they must be in case you need them), but chmod -x them.
Regards
Pope
On Lunes, 30 de Junio de 2003 19:05, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Preben Randhol ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I had to do a update
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 10:32:54PM +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
> hm, patches. i'm not good at creating patches. would it help too if i/we
> send you "this word, sentence, page XX.." and the like?
That's a terrible burden for Alexander to create text from it. Please
get the docbook formatted cod
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:48:27 +0200 Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Have anybody a good recommendation for an easy to use firewall
> with port forwarding ?
>
> I got a home network with a dedicated (Debian of course)
> firewall box with ADSL connected, and ipmasq package installed.
>
>
On Monday 30 June 2003 17:22, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> Ideally. whenever someone tries to FTP in as root, ftp, backup, or some
> other administrative account, I'd like iptables to DROP further incoming
> FTP traffic from that address, and an e-mail to be sent automatically to
> me and their network'
That occurs because that is how it is packaged in the .deb when you download
and update it. Unless you package your own from source there is no work
around. That is something configured in the source or when you package the
application I cant remember what way it is don't off the top of my head.
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 00:29, Martynas Domarkas wrote:
> Pn, 2003-06-27 05:59, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ rašė:
> > Matt Zimmerman écrivait :
> > > > There are a LOT of connetcions: ~700 in a 5 minutes. I did not find any
> > > > configuration options with that hosts. What could it be?
> > > This is su
Hi,
Do You (We) really surely want to include buggy samba 2.2.3a-12, more than
half year old in 'testing' release?
I already know one guy with a 1 week old 'testing' debian hacked through
samba. (I know, it's -12.3 on security for stable, and samba is not secure at
all, but I think this one needs
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:22:42 -0700 Simon Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I actually do this, and have been since when I was running Slackware
> 2.2.
> It takes some scripting and moving things around,
What do you have to move around?
> but I run X as root and
> run each application (mozilla,
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> This is really annoying and insecure. I have proftpd installed on my
> debian in those rare occations I cannot use SSH to transfer files
> from another computer. However I do not want proftpd to run except when
> I start it manually myself and af
Greets all,
A previous post spawned an idea of mine. I am not sure if there is a
project available for this or not. Here we go:
A daemon sits running in the background listening to a special device
(/dev) or an IPC which would originate from syslog-ng. This daemon
would then parse the log and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> Where should I get the key? And why isn't it in debian-keyring? I've got
>> the current sid version.
>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/
Well, that wasn't too hard to find, of course. The "where" question was
mostly rhetorical. More importantly, why on earth isn't the a
Or, which I usually prefer, leave the S and K files in their place (so that
you know where they must be in case you need them), but chmod -x them.
Regards
Pope
On Lunes, 30 de Junio de 2003 19:05, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Preben Randhol ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I had to do a update
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 10:32:54PM +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
> hm, patches. i'm not good at creating patches. would it help too if i/we
> send you "this word, sentence, page XX.." and the like?
That's a terrible burden for Alexander to create text from it. Please
get the docbook formatted cod
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:48:27 +0200 Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Have anybody a good recommendation for an easy to use firewall
> with port forwarding ?
>
> I got a home network with a dedicated (Debian of course)
> firewall box with ADSL connected, and ipmasq package installed.
>
>
That occurs because that is how it is packaged in the .deb when you download
and update it. Unless you package your own from source there is no work
around. That is something configured in the source or when you package the
application I cant remember what way it is don't off the top of my head.
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 00:29, Martynas Domarkas wrote:
> Pn, 2003-06-27 05:59, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ rašė:
> > Matt Zimmerman écrivait :
> > > > There are a LOT of connetcions: ~700 in a 5 minutes. I did not find any
> > > > configuration options with that hosts. What could it be?
> > > This is su
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:22:42 -0700 Simon Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I actually do this, and have been since when I was running Slackware
> 2.2.
> It takes some scripting and moving things around,
What do you have to move around?
> but I run X as root and
> run each application (mozilla,
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> This is really annoying and insecure. I have proftpd installed on my
> debian in those rare occations I cannot use SSH to transfer files
> from another computer. However I do not want proftpd to run except when
> I start it manually myself and af
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> Where should I get the key? And why isn't it in debian-keyring? I've got
>> the current sid version.
>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/
Well, that wasn't too hard to find, of course. The "where" question was
mostly rhetorical. More importantly, why on earth isn't the a
After yet another FTP-based attack today, it occurred to me: are there
any FTP servers out there which will ban a user (or even better, run an
arbitrary script) if he/she tries to log into a specific account?
Ideally. whenever someone tries to FTP in as root, ftp, backup, or some
other administrat
After yet another FTP-based attack today, it occurred to me: are there
any FTP servers out there which will ban a user (or even better, run an
arbitrary script) if he/she tries to log into a specific account?
Ideally. whenever someone tries to FTP in as root, ftp, backup, or some
other administrat
Quoting Preben Randhol ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I had to do a update-rc.d -f proftpd remove again.
> If somebody could explain why it is like this it would be nice.
>From man update-rc.d:
If any files /etc/rcrunlevel.d/[SK]??name already exist
then update-rc.d does nothing. This
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
I just finished the translation of the security howto to german, but
some parts are very ugly hacked.
It would be very nice, if some of you would review my translation (or
at least small parts of it), and send me some patches.
hm, patches. i'm not good at creating patc
Pn, 2003-06-27 05:59, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ rašė:
> Matt Zimmerman écrivait :
> > > There are a LOT of connetcions: ~700 in a 5 minutes. I did not find any
> > > configuration options with that hosts. What could it be?
> > This is surely an evolution "feature" where it means to provide you with
>
Hi
This is really annoying and insecure. I have proftpd installed on my
debian in those rare occations I cannot use SSH to transfer files
from another computer. However I do not want proftpd to run except when
I start it manually myself and after the transfer I turn it off. I saw
now that there wa
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 02:43:46PM +0200, Robert Vazan wrote:
> Is it possible to run all programs including clients (browser, mp3
> player, compiler, ...) under separate accounts just like servers? Would
> it be possible to add this as an option when installing the system?
>
> The problem I have
Quoting Preben Randhol ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I had to do a update-rc.d -f proftpd remove again.
> If somebody could explain why it is like this it would be nice.
>From man update-rc.d:
If any files /etc/rcrunlevel.d/[SK]??name already exist
then update-rc.d does nothing. This
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
I just finished the translation of the security howto to german, but
some parts are very ugly hacked.
It would be very nice, if some of you would review my translation (or
at least small parts of it), and send me some patches.
hm, patches. i'm not good at creating patches.
Pn, 2003-06-27 05:59, Jean Christophe ANDRÉ rašė:
> Matt Zimmerman écrivait :
> > > There are a LOT of connetcions: ~700 in a 5 minutes. I did not find any
> > > configuration options with that hosts. What could it be?
> > This is surely an evolution "feature" where it means to provide you with
>
Hi
This is really annoying and insecure. I have proftpd installed on my
debian in those rare occations I cannot use SSH to transfer files
from another computer. However I do not want proftpd to run except when
I start it manually myself and after the transfer I turn it off. I saw
now that there wa
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 02:43:46PM +0200, Robert Vazan wrote:
> Is it possible to run all programs including clients (browser, mp3
> player, compiler, ...) under separate accounts just like servers? Would
> it be possible to add this as an option when installing the system?
>
> The problem I have
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:48:27 +0200 Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed:
:>Hi
:>
:>Have anybody a good recommendation for an easy to use firewall with port
:>forwarding ?
:>
:>I got a home network with a dedicated (Debian of course) firewall box with
:>ADSL connected, and ipmasq package installed.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:48:27 +0200 Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed:
:>Hi
:>
:>Have anybody a good recommendation for an easy to use firewall with port
:>forwarding ?
:>
:>I got a home network with a dedicated (Debian of course) firewall box with
:>ADSL connected, and ipmasq package installed.
36 matches
Mail list logo
