Hi, before any security consideration u should check the Debian Reference
Guide for compiling the kernel there u will found the "Debian stile" to make
the kernel and install it. I started using it later and makes thing preaty
much easyer.
Cheers,
rak
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:38:56AM +0
> "Andrés" == Andrés Roldán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrés> Hi list. I am the CSO of a company and I am going to install
Andrés> several Debian woody machines with a kernel patched with
Andrés> grsecurity. Theses servers will be critical production-ready
Andrés> machines. The question is,
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:38:56AM +, Andr?s Rold?n wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> I am the CSO of a company and I am going to install several Debian woody
> machines with a kernel patched with grsecurity. Theses servers will be
> critical production-ready machines. The question is, what should I have
On Sunday 18 May 2003 23:02, TiM wrote:
> > How about monolithic kernels? Sure, they won't eliminate all your
> > problems,
> > but the fact of a self-made kernel being monolithic adds another
> > layer of security to your context.
> >
> > If your machines are servers in a production environment, t
Hi list.
I am the CSO of a company and I am going to install several Debian woody
machines with a kernel patched with grsecurity. Theses servers will be
critical production-ready machines. The question is, what should I have
to be aware of by compiling this kernel and what should I do to ensure
a
Am 12:39 2003-05-14 -0500 hat Nathan E Norman geschrieben:
>
>On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 06:26:16PM +0100, Michael Parkinson wrote:
>> [ I wrote ]
>> > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:33:36PM +0100, Michael Parkinson wrote:
>> > > Dear All,
>Well, where you log to is up to you, but that wasn't my question
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Markus Kolb wrote:
Hi,
> where can I get information which patches I need for a secure, not
> exploitable 2.4.20 vanilla kernel?
The Debian Kernel sources of 2.4.20 seem to have all the patches
required. ptrace, routing hash
read
zless /usr/share/doc/kerne
On Fri, 16 May 2003, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Sure, but Herbert's patch is intended to work with both KLIPS (freeswan)
> and Linux 2.5+, so assuming the Debian freeswan maintainer elects to
> apply it once it's stablized, one should have no problems using the
> freeswan userland tools on Debian no
On Sunday 18 May 2003 19:41, Janus N. wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-05-18 at 03:43, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> > With that point aside, you can try out bogofilters and razor. Between
> > the two of those I have few false positive and few false negatives.
>
> Spamassassin already utilizes razor -- so razo
9 matches
Mail list logo
