ptrace exploit

2003-04-11 Thread Birzan George Cristian
This might be a stupid question, I know, but, why isn't there a patch for the ptrace exploit, for the Woody kernel-source? There's been one for some obscure arch I can't remember right now, but not for any of the more widespread ones (well, not according to the changelogs I read, specifically, thes

Re: scan

2003-04-11 Thread Glen Mehn
iain d broadfoot wrote: * nathan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I would very carefully go over your hardware setup, and the configuration of the server. I would run the offending scan many times, altering different things to try and determine some predictable behaviors, and I would go over the ser

Re: scan

2003-04-11 Thread iain d broadfoot
* nathan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I would very carefully go over your hardware setup, and the configuration > of the server. I would run the offending scan many times, altering > different things to try and determine some predictable behaviors, and I > would go over the server logs to see if t

iptables SNAT/DNAT/FORWARD problems

2003-04-11 Thread Hanasaki JiJi
Running the below rules on a firewall. 192.168.1.2 is an SMTP server inside the firewall. 1. there is one smtp server on the internet that has a connection timeout from the inside smtp server connecting on port 25. Telnet host 25 also times out. direct connection from the firewall works just

Re: scan

2003-04-11 Thread danilo lujambio
El jue, 10 de 04 de 2003 a las 21:10, Marcin Owsiany escribió: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 02:33:59PM -0300, danilo lujambio wrote: > > When I scanned with nmap this server , it shuted down and rebooted. > > Did it go through runlevel 6, or just simply crashed? If it was the > latter, then it's prob

Re: administrativa: moron autoreply from martin.j@sargas.nl

2003-04-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 10:33:01AM -0500, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: > if you look at the messages footer, there's a human address (I've put it > into CC) of the listmaster to contact if you wish to do such things. > It is quite common that the listmaster doesn't look into the list itself > for ad