What you're asking for is trivially available on all Linux systems.
Through the "/dev" filesystem, the kernel makes many hardware devices
available to ordinary programs. For example, if you had mounted your
target disk as the secondary master hard drive, you could create an
image of the disk by d
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> i am looking for forensics tools that can be used in computer
> crime investigations, and am particularly interesting in a tool
> that provides raw drive (hard, floppy, CD, DVD, etc.) access in
> order to create comp
Is the `dd` command what you are looking for (in combination with
/dev/loop?), or is there some requirement that wasn't mentioned in
your message?
viv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i am looking for forensics tools that can be used in computer
> crime investigations, and am particu
man dd
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, viv wrote:
> Hi.
>
> As a Debian user, i am posting to this list first in the hopes
> that what i am looking for can be found as a Debian package.
>
> i am looking for forensics tools that can be used in computer
> crime investigations, an
Josh Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having failed to find any information about TCP port 6352 via google
> or /etc/services, I figured I'd ask here. I'm seeing an awful lot of
> dropped packets on this port recently, and I'm curious if anyone
> else has seen this. If so, what purpose does
Hi.
As a Debian user, i am posting to this list first in the hopes
that what i am looking for can be found as a Debian package.
i am looking for forensics tools that can be used in computer
crime investigations, and am particularly interesting in a tool
What you're asking for is trivially available on all Linux systems.
Through the "/dev" filesystem, the kernel makes many hardware devices
available to ordinary programs. For example, if you had mounted your
target disk as the secondary master hard drive, you could create an
image of the disk by d
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> i am looking for forensics tools that can be used in computer
> crime investigations, and am particularly interesting in a tool
> that provides raw drive (hard, floppy, CD, DVD, etc.) access in
> order to create comp
Is the `dd` command what you are looking for (in combination with
/dev/loop?), or is there some requirement that wasn't mentioned in
your message?
viv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i am looking for forensics tools that can be used in computer
> crime investigations, and am particu
man dd
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, viv wrote:
> Hi.
>
> As a Debian user, i am posting to this list first in the hopes
> that what i am looking for can be found as a Debian package.
>
> i am looking for forensics tools that can be used in computer
> crime investigations, an
Josh Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having failed to find any information about TCP port 6352 via google
> or /etc/services, I figured I'd ask here. I'm seeing an awful lot of
> dropped packets on this port recently, and I'm curious if anyone
> else has seen this. If so, what purpose does
Hi.
As a Debian user, i am posting to this list first in the hopes
that what i am looking for can be found as a Debian package.
i am looking for forensics tools that can be used in computer
crime investigations, and am particularly interesting in a tool
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> Some might feel more comfortable with installing a package from testing
> than with modifying version checks in a configure script. But I agree
> that I probably should have said that testing, of course, does not have
> security sup
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 15:23, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:16, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:08:23PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
> > Bidder wrote:
> > > So the version from testing should do. You may want to download the
>
Having failed to find any information about TCP port 6352 via google or
/etc/services, I
figured I'd ask here. I'm seeing an awful lot of dropped packets on this port
recently,
and I'm curious if anyone else has seen this. If so, what purpose does TCP
port 6352 serve
(either in the *nix domain
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> Some might feel more comfortable with installing a package from testing
> than with modifying version checks in a configure script. But I agree
> that I probably should have said that testing, of course, does not have
> security sup
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 15:23, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:16, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:08:23PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
>wrote:
> > > So the version from testing should do. You may want to download the
> >
Having failed to find any information about TCP port 6352 via google or /etc/services,
I
figured I'd ask here. I'm seeing an awful lot of dropped packets on this port recently,
and I'm curious if anyone else has seen this. If so, what purpose does TCP port 6352
serve
(either in the *nix domain o
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:16, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:08:23PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von
> Bidder wrote:
> > So the version from testing should do. You may want to download the
> > source package and compile it yourself to avoid having to upgrade
> > dependen
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:16, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:08:23PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> > So the version from testing should do. You may want to download the
> > source package and compile it yourself to avoid having to upgrade
> > dependencie
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:56:58AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
> > We recommend that you upgrade your xpdf package.
> [snip]
>
> Does anyone know if the 'xpdf-i' is affected by this also, or
> not?
xpdf-i in woody is a dummy package, as the standard xpdf package now
implements the same functional
Miles Beck wrote:
Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or newer...
You have OpenSSL-0.9.6c installed in /usr
openssl-0.9.6d and earlier versions have security flaws, see advisory at
www.open
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:56:58AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
> > We recommend that you upgrade your xpdf package.
> [snip]
>
> Does anyone know if the 'xpdf-i' is affected by this also, or
> not?
xpdf-i in woody is a dummy package, as the standard xpdf package now
implements the same functional
Miles Beck wrote:
Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or newer...
You have OpenSSL-0.9.6c installed in /usr
openssl-0.9.6d and earlier versions have security flaws, see advisory at
www.ope
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 at 08:00:11AM -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
>
> ~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
> Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or newer...
> You have OpenSSL-0.9.6c installed in /usr
> openssl-0.9.6d and earlier ver
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:08:23PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
> So the version from testing should do. You may want to download the
> source package and compile it yourself to avoid having to upgrade
> dependencies (I don't know, just speculating).
Why tell him that? What
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:08:23PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> So the version from testing should do. You may want to download the
> source package and compile it yourself to avoid having to upgrade
> dependencies (I don't know, just speculating).
Why tell him that? What
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:56:58AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
> Does anyone know if the 'xpdf-i' is affected by this also, or
> not?
apt-cache show xpdf-i gave me the following lines:
This is a dummy package required to ensure your xpdf is upgraded to
the latest xpdf package if you previous
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:56:58AM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
> Does anyone know if the 'xpdf-i' is affected by this also, or
> not?
apt-cache show xpdf-i gave me the following lines:
This is a dummy package required to ensure your xpdf is upgraded to
the latest xpdf package if you previous
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003 at 08:00:11AM -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
>
> ~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
> Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or newer...
> You have OpenSSL-0.9.6c installed in /usr
> openssl-0.9.6d and earlier ver
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 16:00, Miles Beck wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
>
> ~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
> Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or newer...
> You have OpenSSL-0.9.6c installed in /usr
> openssl-0.9.6d and earlier ver
> Hello,
>
> Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
>
> ~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
> Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or newer...
> You have OpenSSL-0.9.6c installed in /usr
> openssl-0.9.6d and earlier versions have security flaws, see advisory at
> ww
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Martin Schulze remarked:
> --
> Debian Security Advisory DSA 222-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
> J
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 16:00, Miles Beck wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
>
> ~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
> Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or newer...
> You have OpenSSL-0.9.6c installed in /usr
> openssl-0.9.6d and earlier ver
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:00:11AM -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
Yes, 0.9.6c-2.woody.1. It contains all the security fixes present in
openssl-0.9.6g.
> ~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
> Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or
> Hello,
>
> Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
>
> ~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
> Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or newer...
> You have OpenSSL-0.9.6c installed in /usr
> openssl-0.9.6d and earlier versions have security flaws, see advisory at
> ww
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Martin Schulze remarked:
> --
> Debian Security Advisory DSA 222-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze
> J
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:00:11AM -0700, Miles Beck wrote:
> Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
Yes, 0.9.6c-2.woody.1. It contains all the security fixes present in
openssl-0.9.6g.
> ~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
> Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or
Hi,
as far as I can see, one can get at least 2 out of the following 3 items:
* sshd Privilege Separation
* /var/log/wtmp not world readable
* users get a lastlog message at ssh login
Am I right here?
One could also enable the sshd UseLogin option to get the login
lastlog message, but I'm no
Hello,
Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or newer...
You have OpenSSL-0.9.6c installed in /usr
openssl-0.9.6d and earlier versions have security flaws, see advisory at
www.openssl.org, upg
Hi,
as far as I can see, one can get at least 2 out of the following 3 items:
* sshd Privilege Separation
* /var/log/wtmp not world readable
* users get a lastlog message at ssh login
Am I right here?
One could also enable the sshd UseLogin option to get the login
lastlog message, but I'm no
Hello,
Is there an updated OPENSSL package for Debian greater than OpenSSL-0.9.6c?
~/Net_SSLeay.pm-1.21$ perl Makefile.PL
Checking for OpenSSL-0.9.6g or newer...
You have OpenSSL-0.9.6c installed in /usr
openssl-0.9.6d and earlier versions have security flaws, see advisory at
www.openssl.org, upg
42 matches
Mail list logo
