On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:47:19PM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Pavel Minev Penev wrote:
> > /etc/network/interfaces
> >
> > pre-up
> >
> I know you can do it there. Unfortunately, firewall packages in
> debian (even ones I hav
Title: eu.CMAX.com
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:47:19PM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Pavel Minev Penev wrote:
> > /etc/network/interfaces
> >
> > pre-up
> >
> I know you can do it there. Unfortunately, firewall packages in
> debian (even ones I hav
Title: eu.CMAX.com
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Pavel Minev Penev wrote:
> /etc/network/interfaces
>
> pre-up
>
I know you can do it there. Unfortunately, firewall packages in
debian (even ones I have packaged) do not do this properyl (yet).
Regards
Javi
pgpv1X9dTJ7IA.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Pavel Minev Penev wrote:
> /etc/network/interfaces
>
> pre-up
>
I know you can do it there. Unfortunately, firewall packages in
debian (even ones I have packaged) do not do this properyl (yet).
Regards
Javi
msg08157/pgp0
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 04:18:17PM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
> > There have been several responses to Yogesh's question, but none
> > of them provide a clear and straightforward answer.
>
> Ok. Let me try again: t
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 04:18:17PM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
> > There have been several responses to Yogesh's question, but none
> > of them provide a clear and straightforward answer.
>
> Ok. Let me try again: t
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 at 01:07:48PM -0800, Jeremy A. Puhlman wrote:
> Actually that seems to be a highly secure firewall...Firewalls with no power
> cannot
> be compromised via the network:-)
Wake on Lan? :)
--
Phil
PGP/GPG Key:
http://www.zionlth.org/~plhofmei/
wget -O - http://www.zionlth.
* Florent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi !
>
> I am using the firewall shorewall from stable branch (version 2.1.12) and I
> want to migrate to testing branch (version 1.3.10 and 1.3.11).
>
> Has anybody tested the migration from stable to testing branch ?
> Are there any changes in the configuration
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 at 01:07:48PM -0800, Jeremy A. Puhlman wrote:
> Actually that seems to be a highly secure firewall...Firewalls with no power cannot
> be compromised via the network:-)
Wake on Lan? :)
--
Phil
PGP/GPG Key:
http://www.zionlth.org/~plhofmei/
wget -O - http://www.zionlth.org
* Florent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi !
>
> I am using the firewall shorewall from stable branch (version 2.1.12) and I
> want to migrate to testing branch (version 1.3.10 and 1.3.11).
>
> Has anybody tested the migration from stable to testing branch ?
> Are there any changes in the configuration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 04:18:17PM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
> There have been several responses to Yogesh's question, but none
> of them provide a clear and straightforward answer.
Ok. Let me try again: this is a security risk.
A gateway firewall _needs_ to be setup the following way:
0.- s
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:07:48PM -0800, Jeremy A. Puhlman wrote:
>
> Actually that seems to be a highly secure firewall...Firewalls with no power
> cannot
> be compromised via the network:-)
Neither can this one:
http://www.ranum.com/pubs/a1fwall/
:)
Javi
pgprCjwQ1Z3Sc.pgp
Des
> On Thursday, 2002-12-12 at 13:02:41 -0600, Jeffrey Taylor wrote:
>> Sorry for the multiple sends. Some of the original addresses had
>> typos that I corrected and resent. Bad dog!
>
> Still no cookie, bad dog :-P
>
> http://ipsec.wit.antd.nist.gov/ Host does not resolve
> http://i
On Thursday, 2002-12-12 at 13:02:41 -0600, Jeffrey Taylor wrote:
> Sorry for the multiple sends. Some of the original addresses had
> typos that I corrected and resent. Bad dog!
Still no cookie, bad dog :-P
http://ipsec.wit.antd.nist.gov/ Host does not resolve
http://isakmp.test.ssh.fi/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 04:18:17PM -0500, Raymond Wood wrote:
> There have been several responses to Yogesh's question, but none
> of them provide a clear and straightforward answer.
Ok. Let me try again: this is a security risk.
A gateway firewall _needs_ to be setup the following way:
0.- s
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:07:48PM -0800, Jeremy A. Puhlman wrote:
>
> Actually that seems to be a highly secure firewall...Firewalls with no power cannot
> be compromised via the network:-)
Neither can this one:
http://www.ranum.com/pubs/a1fwall/
:)
Javi
msg08148/pgp0.pgp
D
22 matches
Mail list logo
