Re: Stack-smashing protection

2002-12-09 Thread Alvin Oga
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.06.2129 +0100]: > > I think it would be a great idea to use this patch with debian too as soon > > as > > gcc becomes the compiler by default. Protecting the entire system from this > >

Re: Stack-smashing protection

2002-12-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.06.2129 +0100]: > I think it would be a great idea to use this patch with debian too as soon as > gcc becomes the compiler by default. Protecting the entire system from this > kind of bugs would really be a great security step forward.

Re: Stack-smashing protection

2002-12-09 Thread Alvin Oga
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.06.2129 +0100]: > > I think it would be a great idea to use this patch with debian too as soon as > > gcc becomes the compiler by default. Protecting the entire system from this > > kind

Re: kernel: lockd: connect from unprivileged port

2002-12-09 Thread jh
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:00:45 +0300, "Igor L. Balusov " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anybody could explain me what it's means? You are apparently running RPC services. If you aren't intentionally running these (NFS, YP, etc), you should consider turning off these services (or if you are, atlea

Re: Stack-smashing protection

2002-12-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.06.2129 +0100]: > I think it would be a great idea to use this patch with debian too as soon as > gcc becomes the compiler by default. Protecting the entire system from this > kind of bugs would really be a great security step forward.

unsubscribe

2002-12-09 Thread Goran Zagar

Re: kernel: lockd: connect from unprivileged port

2002-12-09 Thread jh
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:00:45 +0300, "Igor L. Balusov " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anybody could explain me what it's means? You are apparently running RPC services. If you aren't intentionally running these (NFS, YP, etc), you should consider turning off these services (or if you are, atleas

unsubscribe

2002-12-09 Thread Goran Zagar
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Updating Snort Signatures In Stable ?

2002-12-09 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:32:21AM +, Nick Boyce wrote: > >On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:46:01AM +, Nick Boyce wrote: > >> I'd suggest maybe a note about V1.8.4 being "useless" should be added > >> to http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/snort.html, along with some > >> advice about getting s

Re: Updating Snort Signatures In Stable ?

2002-12-09 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 12:32:21AM +, Nick Boyce wrote: > >On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 02:46:01AM +, Nick Boyce wrote: > >> I'd suggest maybe a note about V1.8.4 being "useless" should be added > >> to http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/snort.html, along with some > >> advice about getting s

kernel: lockd: connect from unprivileged port

2002-12-09 Thread Igor L. Balusov
Hello debian-security, Anybody could explain me what it's means? >From /etc/messages kernel: lockd: connect from unprivileged port:xxx.xx.xxx.xx:4206<4>lockd: accept failed (err 11)! kernel: lockd: accept failed (err 11)! >From /etc/daemon.log portmap[7408]: connect from xxx.xx.