1.8.4-Beta1 Build 91
It also seems to be dying without any reports to syslog
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:19:24 -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
Snort is reporting scans in the alert.log but not the portscan.log
Which version? AFAIK the version in woody still has wrong l
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:19:24 -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> Snort is reporting scans in the alert.log but not the portscan.log
Which version? AFAIK the version in woody still has wrong log rotation
causing it to log to a file descriptor corresponding to an already deleted
file (#158042).
HTH,
Snort is reporting scans in the alert.log but not the portscan.log
Any thoughts?
The threshholds have been sent really loose and still no output in the log
preprocessor portscan: $HOME_NET 3 8 portscan.log
--
=
= Management is doi
Snort is reporting scans in the alert.log but not the portscan.log
Any thoughts?
The threshholds have been sent really loose and still no output in the log
preprocessor portscan: $HOME_NET 3 8 portscan.log
--
=
= Management is doin
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 12:37:03AM +0100, David J. M. Karlsen wrote:
> I want to include crypto-patches from kerneli.org as well and these
> patches seem to clash with the freeswan ones.
The latest freeswan patches include the CryptoAPI stuff.
--
Lionel
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 12:37:03AM +0100, David J. M. Karlsen wrote:
> I want to include crypto-patches from kerneli.org as well and these
> patches seem to clash with the freeswan ones.
The latest freeswan patches include the CryptoAPI stuff.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
6 matches
Mail list logo