On Sat, 09 Nov 2002 at 09:09:27AM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> Anyone have an interpretation of the below?
> [65.26.127.147] = firewall
> [192.168.1.1] = firewall
> its a two nic system
>
> Nov 2 10:04:49 ICMP message type destination unreachable - bad host
> from mkc-65-26-127-147.kc.r
OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du samedi 09 novembre 2002, vers
02:02, Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> i did some apache chroot environment (php,perl,ssl), and now
> some users want to use the php "mail" command, so i have to
> include some mta into the chroot.
> As far as i
This one time, at band camp, Hanasaki JiJi said:
> I have installed the woody spam package on a woody box and cannot find
> the config file to fix the below output in syslog.
>
> Can someone help out w/ this?
>
> Thanks
>
> Nov 9 08:13:16 portal spamd[1290]: Still running as root: user not
>
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 05:00:23PM +0100, Michael Eyrich wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:41:05AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> | An easier wethod:
> |
> | $ su
> | # export XAUTHORITY=~user/.Xauthority
>
> This won't work, if ~user is NFS-mounted with the
> 'root_squash'-option, because 'no
On Sat, 09 Nov 2002 at 09:09:27AM -0600, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> Anyone have an interpretation of the below?
> [65.26.127.147] = firewall
> [192.168.1.1] = firewall
> its a two nic system
>
> Nov 2 10:04:49 ICMP message type destination unreachable - bad host
> from mkc-65-26-127-147.kc.r
OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du samedi 09 novembre 2002, vers
02:02, Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> i did some apache chroot environment (php,perl,ssl), and now
> some users want to use the php "mail" command, so i have to
> include some mta into the chroot.
> As far as i
This one time, at band camp, Hanasaki JiJi said:
> I have installed the woody spam package on a woody box and cannot find
> the config file to fix the below output in syslog.
>
> Can someone help out w/ this?
>
> Thanks
>
> Nov 9 08:13:16 portal spamd[1290]: Still running as root: user not
>
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:41:05AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
| On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:40:12PM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDR? wrote:
|
| > Matt Zimmerman ?crivait :
| > > This disables access control in the X server. This is, almost always, a
| > > very bad idea.
| >
| > A better way to allo
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:40:12PM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDR? wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman ?crivait :
> > This disables access control in the X server. This is, almost always, a
> > very bad idea.
>
> A better way to allow it (when you switch from normal to root user) :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
I have installed the woody spam package on a woody box and cannot find
the config file to fix the below output in syslog.
Can someone help out w/ this?
Thanks
Nov 9 08:13:16 portal spamd[1290]: Still running as root: user not
specified, not found, or set to root. Fall back to nobody.
Anyone have an interpretation of the below?
[65.26.127.147] = firewall
[192.168.1.1] = firewall
its a two nic system
Nov 2 10:04:49 ICMP message type destination unreachable - bad host
from mkc-65-26-127-147.kc.rr.com [65.26.127.147]
(65.26.127.147->65.26.127.147)
Nov 2 20:47:36 I
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 05:00:23PM +0100, Michael Eyrich wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:41:05AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> | An easier wethod:
> |
> | $ su
> | # export XAUTHORITY=~user/.Xauthority
>
> This won't work, if ~user is NFS-mounted with the
> 'root_squash'-option, because 'no
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:32:40AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> You could have a proper MTA outside the chroots (like postfix or exim). And
> a bogus, stupid, cat-it-to-localhost-port-25 MTA inside the chroot, like
> ssmtp :-)
ok, i did it your way and in it works fine.
Thanks.
--
g
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:41:05AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
| On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:40:12PM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDR? wrote:
|
| > Matt Zimmerman ?crivait :
| > > This disables access control in the X server. This is, almost always, a
| > > very bad idea.
| >
| > A better way to allo
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:40:12PM +0700, Jean Christophe ANDR? wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman ?crivait :
> > This disables access control in the X server. This is, almost always, a
> > very bad idea.
>
> A better way to allow it (when you switch from normal to root user) :
>
> test@localhost:~$ su
Try http://fgouget.free.fr/sux/sux-readme.shtml
chj
I have installed the woody spam package on a woody box and cannot find
the config file to fix the below output in syslog.
Can someone help out w/ this?
Thanks
Nov 9 08:13:16 portal spamd[1290]: Still running as root: user not
specified, not found, or set to root. Fall back to nobody.
--
To
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Jörg Schütter wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:36:25 +0200 (EET)
> Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Rick Moen wrote:
> >
> > > It's a little simpler to do:
> > >
> > > $ ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Even easier: the following lines in the
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:36:25 +0200 (EET)
Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Rick Moen wrote:
>
> > It's a little simpler to do:
> >
> > $ ssh -X [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Even easier: the following lines in the /root/.bashrc do the same trick:
>
> if [ ! "$LOGNAM
Anyone have an interpretation of the below?
[65.26.127.147] = firewall
[192.168.1.1] = firewall
its a two nic system
Nov 2 10:04:49 ICMP message type destination unreachable - bad host
from mkc-65-26-127-147.kc.rr.com [65.26.127.147]
(65.26.127.147->65.26.127.147)
Nov 2 20:47:36 ICMP messa
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 03:48:39AM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:32:40AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >
> > You could have a proper MTA outside the chroots (like postfix or exim). And
> > a bogus, stupid, cat-it-to-localhost-port-25 MTA inside the ch
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:32:40AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> You could have a proper MTA outside the chroots (like postfix or exim). And
> a bogus, stupid, cat-it-to-localhost-port-25 MTA inside the chroot, like
> ssmtp :-)
ok, i did it your way and in it works fine.
Thanks.
--
g
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Rick Moen wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
> > Password:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mfluch> export XAUTHORITY=/home/mfluch/.Xauthority
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mfluch>
> >
> > ...and then every X application works just as before as the normal user.
>
> It's a litt
Try http://fgouget.free.fr/sux/sux-readme.shtml
chj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Jörg Schütter wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:36:25 +0200 (EET)
> Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Rick Moen wrote:
> >
> > > It's a little simpler to do:
> > >
> > > $ ssh -X root@localhost
> >
> > Even easier: the following lines in the /ro
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 13:36:25 +0200 (EET)
Martin Fluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Rick Moen wrote:
>
> > It's a little simpler to do:
> >
> > $ ssh -X root@localhost
>
> Even easier: the following lines in the /root/.bashrc do the same trick:
>
> if [ ! "$LOGNAME"
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 03:48:39AM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 12:32:40AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >
> > You could have a proper MTA outside the chroots (like postfix or exim). And
> > a bogus, stupid, cat-it-to-localhost-port-25 MTA inside the ch
Quoting Martin Fluch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Indeed. Therefore I use
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
> Password:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mfluch> export XAUTHORITY=/home/mfluch/.Xauthority
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mfluch>
>
> ...and then every X application works just as before as the normal use
> > I am using woody + testing + some unstable:
> >
> > in xterm/gnome-terminal usually I do (as normal user)
> > xhost +
>
> This disables access control in the X server. This is, almost always,
> a very bad idea.
Indeed. Therefore I use
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/h
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Rick Moen wrote:
> > mfluch@seneca:~$ su
> > Password:
> > root@seneca:/home/mfluch> export XAUTHORITY=/home/mfluch/.Xauthority
> > root@seneca:/home/mfluch>
> >
> > ...and then every X application works just as before as the normal user.
>
> It's a little simpler to do
Quoting Martin Fluch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Indeed. Therefore I use
>
> mfluch@seneca:~$ su
> Password:
> root@seneca:/home/mfluch> export XAUTHORITY=/home/mfluch/.Xauthority
> root@seneca:/home/mfluch>
>
> ...and then every X application works just as before as the normal user.
It's a littl
> > I am using woody + testing + some unstable:
> >
> > in xterm/gnome-terminal usually I do (as normal user)
> > xhost +
>
> This disables access control in the X server. This is, almost always,
> a very bad idea.
Indeed. Therefore I use
mfluch@seneca:~$ su
Password:
root@seneca:/home/mfluch
32 matches
Mail list logo
