On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 19:30, Cedric Ware wrote:
>
[...]
> > change in the description to warn about libfam0 being useless w/o a fam
> > daemon somewhere would be a welcome addition :-).
>
> I would heartfully deinstall libfam0 if KDE did not depend on it. :-)
>
> Now, I realize that there is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
holy cow, what was I thinking when I wrote this?
I hope the original post was understandable, but here is the corrected version
Sorry for the repost folks
Cheers
Pedro
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 00:44, Pedro Diaz Jimenez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [Probably
Hi,
[Probably not related much to your problems, but you might find it
interesting]
If all you want is file system encryption you can try the loop-AES patche
http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net/
If used it for a long time on my laptop and it's been perfectly usable
(stable, fast to some excent, no
I've decided to learn how to setup an encrypted filesystem using the
cryptoloop method and I'm having troubles getting my kernal source
patched correctly. I've read the "Loopback Encrypted Filesystem
HOWTO", but it's outdated. Here are a number of patches for kernel
2.4.18 and I'm confused as to
Ive found port sentry really good for detecting port scans and then routeing
the return packets to no where.
:)
Thing
-Original Message-
From: Rolf Kutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2002 4:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian. Org
Subject: Re: Mail relay attempts
*
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:34:44PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Dale Amon wrote:
>
> > I'm building a static sshd and am having a bit of
> > hassle figuring out which configure options are needed
> > for debian compatibility.
>
> ,
> | Since glibc does not sup
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Dale Amon wrote:
> I'm building a static sshd and am having a bit of
> hassle figuring out which configure options are needed
> for debian compatibility.
,
| Since glibc does not support 'int optreset;' functionality
| implemented in most BSDes. We have to include our ow
* Quoting Craig Sanders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> PS: actually, the only other thing you could do is set firewall rules
> blocking inbound tcp port 25. if your mail server is the primary MX for
> your domain then you would also need a secondary MX and open the
> firewall for just that machine. sp
* Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020827 17:07]:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:12:51AM -0500, Daniel J. Rychlik wrote:
> PS: actually, the only other thing you could do is set firewall rules
> blocking inbound tcp port 25. if your mail server is the primary MX for
> your domain then you would al
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 at 11:32:53PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> PS: actually, the only other thing you could do is set firewall rules
> blocking inbound tcp port 25. if your mail server is the primary MX for
> your domain then you would also need a secondary MX and open the
> firewall for just tha
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:27:46AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> apt-get source ssh and look into debian/rules to see what the
> Maintainer does?!
Yes, someone else suggested that. Which was rather easy since
those were the base sources I was working with anyway. It at
least showed that the option
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:12:51AM -0500, Daniel J. Rychlik wrote:
> This is great, Just great. I run a mail server on dsl service
> provided by mabell. I wrote a perl script that mails me some reports
> on activities on my server everyday. I wake up this morning and I
> have an alarm.
> Obvious
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:11:21PM +0300, Mika Bostr?m wrote:
> > Karl Breitner wrote:
> > >Welcome to the world of SPAMfighting
> > Our new server has an official IP since last saturday, and no domain
> > name pointing to it yet besides a dyndns-account I abused for testing
> > purpose. Within t
> Karl Breitner wrote:
> >Welcome to the world of SPAMfighting
> Our new server has an official IP since last saturday, and no domain
> name pointing to it yet besides a dyndns-account I abused for testing
> purpose. Within these three days of operation I had several persons
> trying to get acce
Hi Karl.
Karl Breitner wrote:
What can I say Daniel, except welcome to the harsh reality of a postmaster.
Hmm, as I'm to become a "postmaster" in a few days, too, I would like to
learn a bit more about that. Most probably this list is not intended for
"chat" like this, so I would be happy to
Daniel J. Rychlik wrote:
This is great, Just great. I run a mail server on dsl service
provided by mabell. I wrote a perl script that mails me some reports
on activities on my server everyday. I wake up this morning and I
have an alarm.
Obviously, non of these were relayed from my server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is great, Just great. I run a mail server on dsl service
provided by mabell. I wrote a perl script that mails me some reports
on activities on my server everyday. I wake up this morning and I
have an alarm.
Obviously, non of these were relaye
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 03:00:35AM +0100, Dale Amon wrote:
> Nuke bin Laden: Dale Amon, CEO/MD
> improve the global Islandone Society
> gene pool. www.islandone.org
Nuclear explosions generate radioactive fallout (or make the cave they were
set off in v
Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For one, I've never seen the requirement for /var/empty
> pop up before, which makes me think debian has things
> built differently than I.
apt-get source ssh and look into debian/rules to see what the
Maintainer does?!
--
begin OjE-ist-scheisse.txt
bye,
21 matches
Mail list logo
