Hello Joshua and all,
Joshua Goodall wrote :
> Personally I recommend neither and tell everyone to prefer keys
> and one-time passwords, but that's another story :)
Any hint for the best OTP method on Debian? libpam-opie??
Cheers, J.C.
--
Jean Christophe ANDRÉ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http:/
Hello Joshua and all,
Joshua Goodall wrote :
> Personally I recommend neither and tell everyone to prefer keys
> and one-time passwords, but that's another story :)
Any hint for the best OTP method on Debian? libpam-opie??
Cheers, J.C.
--
Jean Christophe ANDRÉ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http:
Stephen,
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 05:51:02PM -0700, Stephen Johnson wrote:
> Hello, i'm confused on a couple variables in the sshd_config file, i
> have a client that's using that 'other os' and has an ssh client that he
> likes. however, he wanted me to secure the server as much as possible,
> i'v
Hello, i'm confused on a couple variables in the sshd_config file, i
have a client that's using that 'other os' and has an ssh client that he
likes. however, he wanted me to secure the server as much as possible,
i've always disabled clear text passwords(PasswordAuthentication no),
and turn on pam
Stephen,
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 05:51:02PM -0700, Stephen Johnson wrote:
> Hello, i'm confused on a couple variables in the sshd_config file, i
> have a client that's using that 'other os' and has an ssh client that he
> likes. however, he wanted me to secure the server as much as possible,
> i'
Hello, i'm confused on a couple variables in the sshd_config file, i
have a client that's using that 'other os' and has an ssh client that he
likes. however, he wanted me to secure the server as much as possible,
i've always disabled clear text passwords(PasswordAuthentication no),
and turn on pam
Previously Jor-el wrote:
> I'm sure it will. Then again, whats he going to do - not fix this
> bug for another year? He has gotten enough points from his user community
> for dilly dallying on this one for a year now.
Then again you might have noticed that PAM changes maintainer recently
and
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> >
> > Nevermind. This appears to be the problem reported in bug number
> > 95324 . It looks like the maintainer is slacking on the job since not only
> > is the fix mentioned in the bugreport, but implementing the fix is
> > trivial, and yet the p
Previously Jor-el wrote:
> I'm sure it will. Then again, whats he going to do - not fix this
> bug for another year? He has gotten enough points from his user community
> for dilly dallying on this one for a year now.
Then again you might have noticed that PAM changes maintainer recently
an
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> >
> > Nevermind. This appears to be the problem reported in bug number
> > 95324 . It looks like the maintainer is slacking on the job since not only
> > is the fix mentioned in the bugreport, but implementing the fix is
> > trivial, and yet the
10 matches
Mail list logo