Re: A more secure form of .htaccess?

2002-05-04 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 20:27, martin f krafft wrote: > never say impossible. Quite. Way too many people will click continue to all the "this certificate is not certified by anyone trusted" and "this certificate certifies a different site" warnings. Most people would click continue if their brows

Putty 0.45 vs. SSH Login

2002-05-04 Thread Rauno Linnamäe
Hi folks, I am running a Debian (potato) box with a home-brewed 2.4.16 kernel, OpenSSH v. 1.2.3-9.4, and having just come across some strange behaviour I seek the advice of the wiser When PermitRootLogin is set to no in /etc/ssh/sshd_config (as it should be), tryimg to log in as root usi

UNSUBSCRIBE

2002-05-04 Thread qbic
UNSUBSCRIBE -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 10:53:02PM +0300, Daniel Fairhead wrote: > > Secondly, with response to the original post, I think that there is > > an unjustified level of paranoia by the network admin. High school > > children are at best going to be script kiddies. Secondly, your > > school should > >

Re: Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread wsykes
Way to go, Daniel. I used to work in the help desk side of the computer industry and most of the people working there were 18 and up. The 18-21 crowd knew more about programming and the software side of computers than did most of the "older", 45 and up, crowd did. Especially the new languages

Re: Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread Daniel Fairhead
> Secondly, with response to the original post, I think that there is an > unjustified level of paranoia by the network admin. High school children > are at best going to be script kiddies. Secondly, your school should Not so. I'm 15, admin my own linux box and am a developer on the CronosII email

UNSUBSCRIBE

2002-05-04 Thread qbic
UNSUBSCRIBE -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 10:53:02PM +0300, Daniel Fairhead wrote: > > Secondly, with response to the original post, I think that there is > > an unjustified level of paranoia by the network admin. High school > > children are at best going to be script kiddies. Secondly, your > > school should > >

Re: Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread wsykes
Way to go, Daniel. I used to work in the help desk side of the computer industry and most of the people working there were 18 and up. The 18-21 crowd knew more about programming and the software side of computers than did most of the "older", 45 and up, crowd did. Especially the new languages a

Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Ian Cumming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Secondly, with response to the original post, I think that there is an > unjustified level of paranoia by the network admin. High school children > are at best going to be script kiddies. Secondly, your school should > have an ethics agreement between the

Re: Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread Daniel Fairhead
> Secondly, with response to the original post, I think that there is an > unjustified level of paranoia by the network admin. High school children > are at best going to be script kiddies. Secondly, your school should Not so. I'm 15, admin my own linux box and am a developer on the CronosII emai

Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread Ian Cumming
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:06:29PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > In /etc/security/limits.conf: > @studenthardnproc 50 # Limits max cpu processes >From what I can gather, nproc in limits.conf is broken in kernels 2.4.x If someone believes me to be wrong, please correct me, however

Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread Robert van der Meulen
Quoting Ian Cumming ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Secondly, with response to the original post, I think that there is an > unjustified level of paranoia by the network admin. High school children > are at best going to be script kiddies. Secondly, your school should > have an ethics agreement between th

Re: Help

2002-05-04 Thread Ian Cumming
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:06:29PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > In /etc/security/limits.conf: > @studenthardnproc 50 # Limits max cpu processes >From what I can gather, nproc in limits.conf is broken in kernels 2.4.x If someone believes me to be wrong, please correct me, howeve

Re: html spam

2002-05-04 Thread Jussi Ekholm
Thomas Buhk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > can someone plz remove the html spamer and also disable html for the > mailinglist(s)? What about setting up some Procmail recipe, which would handle this? I used to use my own recipes, but once I tried SpamAssassin I'm not willing to give it up for any pr

Re: html spam

2002-05-04 Thread Jussi Ekholm
Thomas Buhk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > can someone plz remove the html spamer and also disable html for the > mailinglist(s)? What about setting up some Procmail recipe, which would handle this? I used to use my own recipes, but once I tried SpamAssassin I'm not willing to give it up for any p