Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:09:15PM +0100, Roland Stoll wrote:
>
>>i'm wondering what this could be. Is it a known exploit, or just a new
>>P2P software like gnutella/kaza/etc ?
>
>
> It is traceroute.
Ah, i remember that traceroute connects to high ports, increments
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:16:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a potato system - with the 2.2.18 kernel. Somone has gotten into a box
> on my network and used this exploit to gain root:
> http://:infected.ilm.net/xpl0itz/l1nux/epcs2.c+epcs2&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1
> The other boxes that
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:40:45AM -0500, Josh Frick wrote:
I thought class C networks were non-routable.
I think you're confused. First of all I think you're confused as to
what a class C network is, and second of all I think you're confused as
to what networks ar
Josh Frick wrote:
>
> Yes, I most definitely was confused. Thank you for the clarification.
> I'm not familiar with the RFCs. My question, however, remains:
> aren't network addresses in that range supposed to be prevented from
> crossing (i.e. being routed) the internet? If they are, then
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:40:45AM -0500, Josh Frick wrote:
>
>>I thought class C networks were non-routable.
>>
>
>I think you're confused. First of all I think you're confused as to
>what a class C network is, and second of all I think you're confused as
>to what netw
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 18:16:22 EST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get: "Could not connect to remote server" when I try to follow that link.
I get: "The address is not available from this machine" when I strip out the
extra leading ":" :)
I am curious as to seeing what potato is vulnerable to.
However:
At 03:11 PM 3/15/2002, Luke Scharf wrote:
I've searched http://groups.google.com and and the web for a quick
recipe. I've also scanned the general documentation, but I haven't
figured out exactly how to do this yet.
I have a machine that's running Debian Potato a web server and an
ipmasq. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luke Scharf writes:
>I have a machine that's running Debian Potato a web server and an
>ipmasq. The machine has an "internal" and "external" network card. The
>internal netwo
I have a potato system - with the 2.2.18 kernel. Somone has gotten into a box
on my network and used this exploit to gain root:
http://:infected.ilm.net/xpl0itz/l1nux/epcs2.c+epcs2&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1
The other boxes that are net accessible are openbsd -- This system is a dual
p6 so I need debia
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002 18:16:22 EST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get: "Could not connect to remote server" when I try to follow that link.
I get: "The address is not available from this machine" when I strip out the extra
leading ":" :)
I am curious as to seeing what potato is vulnerable to.
However:
I've searched http://groups.google.com and and the web for a quick
recipe. I've also scanned the general documentation, but I haven't
figured out exactly how to do this yet.
I have a machine that's running Debian Potato a web server and an
ipmasq. The machine has an "internal" and "external" net
At 03:11 PM 3/15/2002, Luke Scharf wrote:
>I've searched http://groups.google.com and and the web for a quick
>recipe. I've also scanned the general documentation, but I haven't
>figured out exactly how to do this yet.
>
>I have a machine that's running Debian Potato a web server and an
>ipmasq.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:09:15PM +0100, Roland Stoll wrote:
> i'm wondering what this could be. Is it a known exploit, or just a new
> P2P software like gnutella/kaza/etc ?
It is traceroute.
--
___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In message <1016230298.20826.8.camel@garcon>, Luke Scharf writes:
>I have a machine that's running Debian Potato a web server and an
>ipmasq. The machine has an "internal" and "external" network card. The
I have a potato system - with the 2.2.18 kernel. Somone has gotten into a box
on my network and used this exploit to gain root:
http://:infected.ilm.net/xpl0itz/l1nux/epcs2.c+epcs2&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1
The other boxes that are net accessible are openbsd -- This system is a dual
p6 so I need debi
Hello,
since a few days i have tons like this in my log:
grobi kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=17 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:32794 L=37 S=0x00 I=41867 F=0x T=117 (#4)
the packets come from many different addresses and always in a bunch of
3 - 5.
i'm wondering what thi
I've searched http://groups.google.com and and the web for a quick
recipe. I've also scanned the general documentation, but I haven't
figured out exactly how to do this yet.
I have a machine that's running Debian Potato a web server and an
ipmasq. The machine has an "internal" and "external" ne
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 09:09:15PM +0100, Roland Stoll wrote:
> i'm wondering what this could be. Is it a known exploit, or just a new
> P2P software like gnutella/kaza/etc ?
It is traceroute.
--
___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PG
Hello,
since a few days i have tons like this in my log:
grobi kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=17 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:32794 L=37 S=0x00 I=41867 F=0x T=117 (#4)
the packets come from many different addresses and always in a bunch of
3 - 5.
i'm wondering what this
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:40:45AM -0500, Josh Frick wrote:
> >
> I thought class C networks were non-routable.
I think you're confused. First of all I think you're confused as to
what a class C network is, and second of all I think you're confused as
to what networks are non-routable and what it
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 06:40:45AM -0500, Josh Frick wrote:
> >
> I thought class C networks were non-routable.
I think you're confused. First of all I think you're confused as to
what a class C network is, and second of all I think you're confused as
to what networks are non-routable and what i
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Hal said:
I run a potato server on an ethernet behind a firewall connected by dsl to the
internet. The only service exposed is ftp, In the middle of last night ippl
reported an ftp connection attempt from 192.168.1,1 The network behind my
Stephen Gran wrote:
>This one time, at band camp, Hal said:
>
>>I run a potato server on an ethernet behind a firewall connected by dsl to the
>internet. The only service exposed is ftp, In the middle of last night ippl
>reported an ftp connection attempt from 192.168.1,1 The network behind
Hi Group,
ist there someone who is using the MALLOC_CHECK environment variables?
How is the Performance?
cu thomas
--
Thomas Braun WESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren Tel 0241/701333-0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet & Security for ProfessionalsFax 0241/911879
WESTEND ist C
Hi Group,
ist there someone who is using the MALLOC_CHECK environment variables?
How is the Performance?
cu thomas
--
Thomas Braun WESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren Tel 0241/701333-0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet & Security for ProfessionalsFax 0241/911879
WESTEND ist
25 matches
Mail list logo
