On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 03:20:44PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
thanks, this confirm me that i really have to avoid it ;)
cheers,
JeF
> ## Jean-Francois Dive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption
> > mechanism. I'd like
> > to ha
Hi All,
Just checking our radius servers, I noticed that Cistron radius in potato is
still version 1.6.1, and I cannot see any notes of security updates for the
package in the changelog.Debian.gz file.
Andrew Tait
System Administrator
Country NetLink Pty, Ltd
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http:/
Osvaldo Mundim Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anybody use iptables in a DHCP network? I want to know how
> would be some rule in this case...
There were some messages flying around debian-firewall concerning DHCP
and iptables. They don't seem to be in the archive yet, though.
--
Ola
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 03:20:44PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
thanks, this confirm me that i really have to avoid it ;)
cheers,
JeF
> ## Jean-Francois Dive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption mechanism. I'd
>like
> > to have
Hi All,
Just checking our radius servers, I noticed that Cistron radius in potato is
still version 1.6.1, and I cannot see any notes of security updates for the
package in the changelog.Debian.gz file.
Andrew Tait
System Administrator
Country NetLink Pty, Ltd
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http:
Osvaldo Mundim Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anybody use iptables in a DHCP network? I want to know how
> would be some rule in this case...
There were some messages flying around debian-firewall concerning DHCP
and iptables. They don't seem to be in the archive yet, though.
--
Ol
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:52:21AM -0500, Moses Moore wrote:
> Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> > I want to know if my point of view is right, or if there is any
> > functionality that hosts.{allow,deny} scheme provides which iptables
> > can't.
>
> - You have daemon-by-daemon settings instead o
Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> I want to know if my point of view is right, or if there is any
> functionality that hosts.{allow,deny} scheme provides which iptables
> can't.
- You have daemon-by-daemon settings instead of port-by-port or
protocol-by-protocol.
- the aforementioned 'extra layer
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:52:21AM -0500, Moses Moore wrote:
> Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> > I want to know if my point of view is right, or if there is any
> > functionality that hosts.{allow,deny} scheme provides which iptables
> > can't.
>
> - You have daemon-by-daemon settings instead
Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> I want to know if my point of view is right, or if there is any
> functionality that hosts.{allow,deny} scheme provides which iptables
> can't.
- You have daemon-by-daemon settings instead of port-by-port or
protocol-by-protocol.
- the aforementioned 'extra laye
## Jean-Francois Dive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption mechanism.
> I'd like
> to have the impressions from people of the list about the cryptographic
> strenght of
> such algorithm, especially now that wireless WEP RC4 based encryption hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Osvaldo Mundim Junior on Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:57:28AM -0300:
> Does anybody use iptables in a DHCP network? I want to know how would
> be some rule in this case...
Have a look at 'firestarter' as well, a GNOME frontend to building
firewall ru
Monday, March 04, 2002, 1:57:28 PM, Osvaldo Mundim Junior wrote:
> Does anybody use iptables in a DHCP network? I want to know how would be some
> rule in this case...
Check the rules from the monmotha-iptables-script which can be
downloaded from http://monmotha.mplug.org. In my network these
DH
Hi all,
Does anybody use iptables in a DHCP network? I want to know how would be some
rule in this case...
tks in advance...
Osvaldo
## Jean-Francois Dive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption mechanism. I'd like
> to have the impressions from people of the list about the cryptographic strenght of
> such algorithm, especially now that wireless WEP RC4 based encryption have bee
hi all,
I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption mechanism.
I'd like
to have the impressions from people of the list about the cryptographic
strenght of
such algorithm, especially now that wireless WEP RC4 based encryption have been
broken.
I understand that the proble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Said Osvaldo Mundim Junior on Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:57:28AM -0300:
> Does anybody use iptables in a DHCP network? I want to know how would
> be some rule in this case...
Have a look at 'firestarter' as well, a GNOME frontend to building
firewall r
Monday, March 04, 2002, 1:57:28 PM, Osvaldo Mundim Junior wrote:
> Does anybody use iptables in a DHCP network? I want to know how would be some
> rule in this case...
Check the rules from the monmotha-iptables-script which can be
downloaded from http://monmotha.mplug.org.; In my network these
Hi all,
Does anybody use iptables in a DHCP network? I want to know how would be some
rule in this case...
tks in advance...
Osvaldo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi all,
I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption mechanism. I'd like
to have the impressions from people of the list about the cryptographic strenght of
such algorithm, especially now that wireless WEP RC4 based encryption have been
broken.
I understand that the problem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello,
tcpd offer offer another layer of security in your application ACL
scheme which is always a good thing. Another point is that you can
have more control on whow do what from where, you can match on usernames
which is something that iptables cant do as it acts at an underlying
level. Security
23 matches
Mail list logo