Re: strange entry in /etc/init.d

Previously Andreas Goesele wrote: > I found this strange as I thought for bash one would write It is not a bash file, it is used by pam_env and contains lines with a simple key=value syntax. > Is it possible that some package would add such a line to my > /etc/environment? What package could that

strange entry in /etc/init.d

Hi, unexpectedly I found my LANG locale env variable change. I took a look into /etc/environment and found as last entry: LANG=C I found this strange as I thought for bash one would write export LANG=C (or LANG=C and then export LANG) and my own entry export [EMAIL PROTECTED] wasn't changed.

Re: strange entry in /etc/init.d

Previously Andreas Goesele wrote: > I found this strange as I thought for bash one would write It is not a bash file, it is used by pam_env and contains lines with a simple key=value syntax. > Is it possible that some package would add such a line to my > /etc/environment? What package could tha

strange entry in /etc/init.d

Hi, unexpectedly I found my LANG locale env variable change. I took a look into /etc/environment and found as last entry: LANG=C I found this strange as I thought for bash one would write export LANG=C (or LANG=C and then export LANG) and my own entry export [EMAIL PROTECTED] wasn't changed

Re: Problems with chrooting bind 9.2.0

Thursday, February 14, 2002, 2:14:30 PM, Michael Wood wrote: >> 2) copying it to /chroot/named/etc/bind > i.e. /chroot/named/etc/bind is a directory containing the file > rndc.key? > This should work. What do the logs look like now? Okay, it looks like this now: /chroot/named/etc/bind consis

Re: Problems with chrooting bind 9.2.0

Thursday, February 14, 2002, 2:14:30 PM, Michael Wood wrote: >> 2) copying it to /chroot/named/etc/bind > i.e. /chroot/named/etc/bind is a directory containing the file > rndc.key? > This should work. What do the logs look like now? Okay, it looks like this now: /chroot/named/etc/bind consi

Re: is there something hacked in my network?

hi Mike, thanks for your reply. To give more info about my network: I'm running Debian unstable, 2.4-kernel with iptables, the network is only my machine on ip 192.168.0.1 and an externel ethernetcard and the w2k-machine on static ip 192.168.0.253. On the debian-box is snort installed for intru

is there something hacked in my network?

hi all, A few days ago I scanned the only win2k-machine in my littles homenetwork (consist of my debian-machine, the server, and a w2k-machine) with nmap -sT 192.0.168.253. This was the result I got: Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA30 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) Interesting ports on (192.168.0.253): (

Re: is there something hacked in my network?

hi Mike, thanks for your reply. To give more info about my network: I'm running Debian unstable, 2.4-kernel with iptables, the network is only my machine on ip 192.168.0.1 and an externel ethernetcard and the w2k-machine on static ip 192.168.0.253. On the debian-box is snort installed for intr

is there something hacked in my network?

hi all, A few days ago I scanned the only win2k-machine in my littles homenetwork (consist of my debian-machine, the server, and a w2k-machine) with nmap -sT 192.0.168.253. This was the result I got: Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA30 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) Interesting ports on (192.168.0.253):