í¬ë§ì°¬ ìí´, ì ë
ì´ì¸ ë³´ì¸ì!!!
â060-700-8865 ë구 ì ëª
ìì ì¸ì´ ì§ì ìë´ í´ ë립ëë¤.(ë구MBCìíê°ì¬, ëìë°±íì
문íì¼í° ìíê°ì¬, ìë¨ì¼ë³´ ì£¼ê° ì´ì¸...) ì§ì
ì´, ìíì´, ì§íì´, ì ì ì´, ì¬ëì´, ê±´ê°ì´, í ì ë¹ê²
Èñ¸ÁÂù »õÇØ, ½Å³â ¿î¼¼ º¸¼¼¿ä!!!
¢Ï060-700-8865 ´ë±¸ À¯¸í ¿ª¼úÀÎÀÌ Á÷Á¢ »ó´ã ÇØ µå¸³´Ï´Ù.(´ë±¸MBC¿ªÇа»ç, µ¿¾Æ¹éÈÁ¡
¹®È¼¾ÅÍ ¿ªÇа»ç, ¿µ³²ÀϺ¸ ÁÖ°£ ¿î¼¼...) Á÷¾÷¿î, ½ÃÇè¿î, ÁøÇпî, ¾ÖÁ¤¿î, »ç¶û¿î, °Ç°¿î, ÅäÁ¤ºñ°á,
¼Ó±ÃÇÕ °Ñ±ÃÇÕ, »ç¾÷¿î, ½ÂÁø¿î, ÀÛ¸í, ÅÃÀÏ, º°ÀÚ¸®Á¡, dz¼öÁö¸®, ½ÅÅëÇÏ°Ô ¸ÂÃß
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:41:44AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm setting up a project for some friends. I want each of them to
> have their own account, but I want the project to be hosted (and run
> under) a seperate account. Each user should be able to su to the
> project account
hi ya andrew
theres's about a dozen anti-virus sw...
http://www.Linux-sec.net/Mail/#AntiVirus
have fun linuxing
alvin
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Andrew Tait wrote:
> I am using Exiscan: http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/. Installation is fairly
> straight forward.
>
> Along with the linux version of M
I am using Exiscan: http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/. Installation is fairly
straight forward.
Along with the linux version of McAfee anti-virus, which is rather hard to
find on their site, but does exist.
There is only one open source anti-virus program that I know of, but AFAIK,
that is still in
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 01:41:44AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm setting up a project for some friends. I want each of them to
> have their own account, but I want the project to be hosted (and run
> under) a seperate account. Each user should be able to su to the
> project accoun
hi ya andrew
theres's about a dozen anti-virus sw...
http://www.Linux-sec.net/Mail/#AntiVirus
have fun linuxing
alvin
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Andrew Tait wrote:
> I am using Exiscan: http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/. Installation is fairly
> straight forward.
>
> Along with the linux version of
I am using Exiscan: http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/. Installation is fairly
straight forward.
Along with the linux version of McAfee anti-virus, which is rather hard to
find on their site, but does exist.
There is only one open source anti-virus program that I know of, but AFAIK,
that is still i
also sprach Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.20.2105 +0100]:
> What I'm wondering is if PAM or some other mechanism can be used to
> prevent a user from logging in via a network connection. It looks
> like people here don't know; that's fine, I'll continue researching.
i don't know wh
hi ya nathan
> No, it's not the right way. The daemons need to run as the project
> user, not the individual user.
i usually wonder why scripts need to be run as a specific user
( webmaster -- seems to be a popular example ...
-- solution i use... webmaster does NOT get a login prompt for any
No, it's not the right way. The daemons need to run as the project
user, not the individual user.
I know how to set up groups, permissions, etc. ... been doing that for
several years now.
What I'm wondering is if PAM or some other mechanism can be used to
prevent a user from logging in via a net
LOL, talk about not seeing the forest for the tree's... Yeah. Do it the
way he says. Its the "right" way of doing something like that.
David.
Alvin Oga wrote:
>
> hi ya nathan
>
> create a group "proj"
>
> add tom, dick, harry to belong to the proj group ( /etc/group )
> - those NOT li
also sprach Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.20.2105 +0100]:
> What I'm wondering is if PAM or some other mechanism can be used to
> prevent a user from logging in via a network connection. It looks
> like people here don't know; that's fine, I'll continue researching.
i don't know w
hi ya nathan
> No, it's not the right way. The daemons need to run as the project
> user, not the individual user.
i usually wonder why scripts need to be run as a specific user
( webmaster -- seems to be a popular example ...
-- solution i use... webmaster does NOT get a login prompt for an
No, it's not the right way. The daemons need to run as the project
user, not the individual user.
I know how to set up groups, permissions, etc. ... been doing that for
several years now.
What I'm wondering is if PAM or some other mechanism can be used to
prevent a user from logging in via a ne
hi ya nathan
create a group "proj"
add tom, dick, harry to belong to the proj group ( /etc/group )
- those NOT listed in proj will NOT be able to do anything
make sure /home/project is owned by projectmanager and group proj
make sure its chmod 775 or chmod 770 for /home/project
make s
LOL, talk about not seeing the forest for the tree's... Yeah. Do it the
way he says. Its the "right" way of doing something like that.
David.
Alvin Oga wrote:
>
> hi ya nathan
>
> create a group "proj"
>
> add tom, dick, harry to belong to the proj group ( /etc/group )
> - those NOT l
Nathan,
Yes its possible, but it might not be wise ;)
One way to set it up so that the account doesn't have a password but can
be accessed is disable its password, but create a ssh public/private key
pair and give the users who should have access to it the key so they can
use key based authentica
Oops...
*shame on me*
Just noticed that source.rfc822.org -> ftp2.de.debian.org
(switched to that one because ftp.de.debian.org seemed down)
It must have been apt-get update that tried to use
active FTP which got blocked by the firewall and logged by
snort...
Excuse me for waisting every
Dries Kimpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Today, I saw in the snort logs the following:
> (removed ip & date to get it in 78-col format)
>
> 193.189.224.13:21 -> ip:58153 UNKNOWN *2*A**S* RESERVEDBITS
> 193.189.224.13:42940 -> ip:113 SYN 12S* RESERVEDBITS
> 193.189.224.13:42941 -> ip:58154 U
Today, I saw in the snort logs the following:
(removed ip & date to get it in 78-col format)
193.189.224.13:21 -> ip:58153 UNKNOWN *2*A**S* RESERVEDBITS
193.189.224.13:42940 -> ip:113 SYN 12S* RESERVEDBITS
193.189.224.13:42941 -> ip:58154 UNKNOWN *2*A**S* RESERVEDBITS
193.189.224.13:42942 -
hi ya nathan
create a group "proj"
add tom, dick, harry to belong to the proj group ( /etc/group )
- those NOT listed in proj will NOT be able to do anything
make sure /home/project is owned by projectmanager and group proj
make sure its chmod 775 or chmod 770 for /home/project
make
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 07:07:23 +0100, Hans-Joachim Picht wrote:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[...]
> T-
Nathan,
Yes its possible, but it might not be wise ;)
One way to set it up so that the account doesn't have a password but can
be accessed is disable its password, but create a ssh public/private key
pair and give the users who should have access to it the key so they can
use key based authentic
Dans un message du 20 Jan à 15:38, Emmanuel Lacour écrivait :
> Same idea can be applied to /etc/nss-mysql.conf and
> /etc/nss-mysql-root.conf (as explained in the README of the package!)
/etc/nss-mysql-root.conf should be 0600 and owned by root or nss-mysql
will refuse to work. There is no real s
Hi,
I'm just testing mysql authentication with pam and libnss and I saw that
all files in /etc/pam.d/ are 0644 mode. But with libpam-mysql I have to
put in /etc/pam.d/qpopper (for example) login and password of the user
who can show paswords in my database
So who can tell me one thing which e
Oops...
*shame on me*
Just noticed that source.rfc822.org -> ftp2.de.debian.org
(switched to that one because ftp.de.debian.org seemed down)
It must have been apt-get update that tried to use
active FTP which got blocked by the firewall and logged by
snort...
Excuse me for waisting ever
Dries Kimpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Today, I saw in the snort logs the following:
> (removed ip & date to get it in 78-col format)
>
> 193.189.224.13:21 -> ip:58153 UNKNOWN *2*A**S* RESERVEDBITS
> 193.189.224.13:42940 -> ip:113 SYN 12S* RESERVEDBITS
> 193.189.224.13:42941 -> ip:58154
Today, I saw in the snort logs the following:
(removed ip & date to get it in 78-col format)
193.189.224.13:21 -> ip:58153 UNKNOWN *2*A**S* RESERVEDBITS
193.189.224.13:42940 -> ip:113 SYN 12S* RESERVEDBITS
193.189.224.13:42941 -> ip:58154 UNKNOWN *2*A**S* RESERVEDBITS
193.189.224.13:42942
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 07:07:23 +0100, Hans-Joachim Picht wrote:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[...]
> T
Dans un message du 20 Jan à 15:38, Emmanuel Lacour écrivait :
> Same idea can be applied to /etc/nss-mysql.conf and
> /etc/nss-mysql-root.conf (as explained in the README of the package!)
/etc/nss-mysql-root.conf should be 0600 and owned by root or nss-mysql
will refuse to work. There is no real
Hi,
I'm just testing mysql authentication with pam and libnss and I saw that
all files in /etc/pam.d/ are 0644 mode. But with libpam-mysql I have to
put in /etc/pam.d/qpopper (for example) login and password of the user
who can show paswords in my database
So who can tell me one thing which
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm setting up a project for some friends. I want each of them to
> have their own account, but I want the project to be hosted (and run
> under) a seperate account. Each user should be able to su to the
> project account to restart daemons.
Hi,
I'm setting up a project for some friends. I want each of them to
have their own account, but I want the project to be hosted (and run
under) a seperate account. Each user should be able to su to the
project account to restart daemons. No user should be able to log in
as the project user.
34 matches
Mail list logo
