Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Daniel Rychlik
- Original Message - From: "Brian P. Flaherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 8:41 AM Subject: Re: Exim mail > "Daniel Rychlik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How do I stop this from happening. Apparently my bud telented to port 25 > >

Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Warren Turkal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 15 December 2001 10:24 am, Tim Haynes wrote: > However, you can also do exactly the same thing in exim.conf itself - > OTTOMH the directive is `local_interfaces', BICBW. And that directive only matters when exim is running as a daemon wi

Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Daniel Rychlik
- Original Message - From: "Brian P. Flaherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 8:41 AM Subject: Re: Exim mail > "Daniel Rychlik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How do I stop this from happening. Apparently my bud telented to port 25 > > and somehow sent mai

Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Warren Turkal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 15 December 2001 10:24 am, Tim Haynes wrote: > However, you can also do exactly the same thing in exim.conf itself - > OTTOMH the directive is `local_interfaces', BICBW. And that directive only matters when exim is running as a daemon wit

Re: Following security issues found upstream

2001-12-15 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Jean-Marc Boursot wrote: > Like the last postfix DoS? Am I wrong or there wasn't any bugtraq > report for that? There was. Wichert. -- _ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PR

Re: Following security issues found upstream

2001-12-15 Thread Jean-Marc Boursot
On Thursday 13 December 2001 20:41, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote: > > I guess a public database could be useful both for > > We have a private database (well, a status-file in which we keep > track of things). A public database can't be used since we

Re: Following security issues found upstream

2001-12-15 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Jean-Marc Boursot wrote: > Like the last postfix DoS? Am I wrong or there wasn't any bugtraq > report for that? There was. Wichert. -- _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PR

Re: Following security issues found upstream

2001-12-15 Thread Jean-Marc Boursot
On Thursday 13 December 2001 20:41, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote: > > I guess a public database could be useful both for > > We have a private database (well, a status-file in which we keep > track of things). A public database can't be used since w

Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Tim Haynes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian P. Flaherty) writes: > Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > hmmm, im a bit of a newbie here, but how do you bind a > > daemon, eg telnetd to a certain nic? > > Try running xinetd, if you aren't already. In each service block, you can > use the 'bind' option, which ties

Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Brian P. Flaherty
Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hmmm, im a bit of a newbie here, but how do you bind a > daemon, eg telnetd to a certain nic? Try running xinetd, if you aren't already. In each service block, you can use the 'bind' option, which ties the service to a NIC's IP address. Someone please correct

Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Josh
hmmm, im a bit of a newbie here, but how do you bind a daemon, eg telnetd to a certain nic? __ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com or bid at http://auctio

Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Brian P. Flaherty
"Daniel Rychlik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How do I stop this from happening. Apparently my bud telented to port 25 > and somehow sent mail from my root account. Any suggestions, white papers > or links? Id would like to block the telnet application all together, but I > dont think thats po

Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Tim Haynes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian P. Flaherty) writes: > Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > hmmm, im a bit of a newbie here, but how do you bind a > > daemon, eg telnetd to a certain nic? > > Try running xinetd, if you aren't already. In each service block, you can > use the 'bind' option, which tie

Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Brian P. Flaherty
Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hmmm, im a bit of a newbie here, but how do you bind a > daemon, eg telnetd to a certain nic? Try running xinetd, if you aren't already. In each service block, you can use the 'bind' option, which ties the service to a NIC's IP address. Someone please correct

Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Josh
hmmm, im a bit of a newbie here, but how do you bind a daemon, eg telnetd to a certain nic? __ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com or bid at http://aucti

Re: Exim mail

2001-12-15 Thread Brian P. Flaherty
"Daniel Rychlik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How do I stop this from happening. Apparently my bud telented to port 25 > and somehow sent mail from my root account. Any suggestions, white papers > or links? Id would like to block the telnet application all together, but I > dont think thats p

Re: Apt-get is insecure

2001-12-15 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Torrin wrote: > Well, if it's not used (skipped) should we even bother installing > debsig-verify and debsigs? Right now it's only useful if you want to play with the technology. Wichert. -- _ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Apt-get is insecure

2001-12-15 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Torrin wrote: > Well, if it's not used (skipped) should we even bother installing > debsig-verify and debsigs? Right now it's only useful if you want to play with the technology. Wichert. -- _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]