removing gdm

2001-12-07 Thread An-Dee
Hello I have a little problem. I use woody. I installed gdm, but unfortunately, I cannot use my keyboard and my mouse with it, so I installed kdm and forget to remove gdm. Now I dont have any working grafical login. When I try to remove gdm I got the following: Reading Package Lists...

Re: Network traffic monitoring. (which IP makes big traffic?)

2001-12-07 Thread Dmitriy
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:33:46AM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote: [snip] > > root# trafshow > - shows in a small table ( more readable) the ongoing traffic > ( keeps a ongoing total traffic > Or try ntop . It has a web insterface and shows loads of various statistics. > for the rest of the

removing gdm

2001-12-07 Thread An-Dee
Hello I have a little problem. I use woody. I installed gdm, but unfortunately, I cannot use my keyboard and my mouse with it, so I installed kdm and forget to remove gdm. Now I dont have any working grafical login. When I try to remove gdm I got the following: Reading Package Lists...

Spamming

2001-12-07 Thread Phillip Hofmeister
Dear Sir: I am contacting you because you are listed as the ARIN coordinator for the following IP address: 64.69.222.21 (aka getfriction.org). I am a member of the Debian security list. On the archive listed below you will find several unsolicited ads spamming the list for "getfriction.org" with

Re: Network traffic monitoring. (which IP makes big traffic?)

2001-12-07 Thread Dmitriy
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:33:46AM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote: [snip] > > root# trafshow > - shows in a small table ( more readable) the ongoing traffic > ( keeps a ongoing total traffic > Or try ntop . It has a web insterface and shows loads of various statistics. > for the rest of th

get some

2001-12-07 Thread get some
 get ahead. get noticed. get some. A cool new internet experience!  getfriction.org  A great gift idea for the Holidays!  

Spamming

2001-12-07 Thread Phillip Hofmeister
Dear Sir: I am contacting you because you are listed as the ARIN coordinator for the following IP address: 64.69.222.21 (aka getfriction.org). I am a member of the Debian security list. On the archive listed below you will find several unsolicited ads spamming the list for "getfriction.org" wit

Re: pam stuff

2001-12-07 Thread Philipe Gaspar
Em Sex 07 Dez 2001 05:52, Warren Turkal escreveu: > Is it possible to differentiate what Pam modules are used by the user > logging? > For instance, I want root to use one time passwords to login, and I > want normal users to use their normal password. I think so. > > Also, is there a way to

get some

2001-12-07 Thread get some
 get ahead. get noticed. get some. A cool new internet experience!  getfriction.org  A great gift idea for the Holidays!  

Re: pam stuff

2001-12-07 Thread Philipe Gaspar
Em Sex 07 Dez 2001 05:52, Warren Turkal escreveu: > Is it possible to differentiate what Pam modules are used by the user > logging? > For instance, I want root to use one time passwords to login, and I > want normal users to use their normal password. I think so. > > Also, is there a way to

Re: pam stuff

2001-12-07 Thread Phillip Hofmeister
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Warren, Some screen locks accept either passwd (lockvc). However, whether or not it accepts root's passwd is up to the program itself. If you program does not have this feature simply log in as root on a normal tty and send the proc a term signal or

Re: pam stuff

2001-12-07 Thread Phillip Hofmeister
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Warren, Some screen locks accept either passwd (lockvc). However, whether or not it accepts root's passwd is up to the program itself. If you program does not have this feature simply log in as root on a normal tty and send the proc a term signal o

lprng

2001-12-07 Thread Juha Jäykkä
Nessus claims all versions of lprng prior to 3.6.24 has some unnamed flaw which allows exploiting the daemon's priviledges. As a debian lprng runs as daemon, it is not as dangerous as nessus claims (root compromise), at least directly. How ever, I cannot find any references to any vulnerabiliti

lprng

2001-12-07 Thread Juha Jäykkä
Nessus claims all versions of lprng prior to 3.6.24 has some unnamed flaw which allows exploiting the daemon's priviledges. As a debian lprng runs as daemon, it is not as dangerous as nessus claims (root compromise), at least directly. How ever, I cannot find any references to any vulnerabilit

pam stuff

2001-12-07 Thread Warren Turkal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is it possible to differentiate what Pam modules are used by the user logging? For instance, I want root to use one time passwords to login, and I want normal users to use their normal password. Also, is there a way to make the root password w