## Martin WHEELER ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Is anyone else having problems with the robot from
> openfind.com.tw
That one has not been seen here.
> Anyone know of a sure-fire robot killer under woody?
Apache himself (assuming your webserver runs apache, other servers
should have something si
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Martin" == Martin WHEELER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Is anyone else having problems with the robot from
Martin> openfind.com.tw
Martin> -- an intrusive, irritating, hard-to-get-rid-of crawler that
Martin> completely paralyses my syst
Is anyone else having problems with the robot from
openfind.com.tw
-- an intrusive, irritating, hard-to-get-rid-of crawler that completely
paralyses my system *every day*?
Despite what I put in any robots.txt, this one disregards all rules and
just jams up my system, downloading every damn
Martin WHEELER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is anyone else having problems with the robot from
> openfind.com.tw
> -- an intrusive, irritating, hard-to-get-rid-of crawler that completely
> paralyses my system *every day*?
Nope. How does it paralyse you, anyway?
> Despite what I put in any
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Previously Vineet Kumar wrote:
>
> > So are "please" and "thank you," but it's generally considered polite.
>
> Also using Mail-Followup-To is standard and expected behaviour on
> debian lists.
That's a reasonable requirement only when Debian add
OK we've had upstream report that noone should use lprng 3.8.0 because
it has a security bug in it but there is no more information. This
message went out 16 November and still no more details (except it is
setuid related) and no fix in sight yet. He said that a new release
will be ASAP.
It's n
OK we've had upstream report that noone should use lprng 3.8.0 because
it has a security bug in it but there is no more information. This
message went out 16 November and still no more details (except it is
setuid related) and no fix in sight yet. He said that a new release
will be ASAP.
It's no
On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 10:28:56AM +0100, Johannes Weiss wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> UNfortunately, WIN-SSH is very buggy, it only works if I take the 3des
> algorithm, if I take one of the others (blowfish,...) it crashed.
>
What is unfortunate about that? From my experien
Johannes Weiss wrote on Nov 24, 2001 at 10:28:56 AM:
> Hi,
> I MUST :(( tunnel an HTTP stream from a winshit->my linux server and on win I
> must use SSH-WIN that it works.
>
> UNfortunately, WIN-SSH is very buggy, it only works if I take the 3des
> algorithm, if I take one of the others (blow
Johannes Weiss wrote on Nov 24, 2001 at 10:28:56 AM:
> Hi,
> I MUST :(( tunnel an HTTP stream from a winshit->my linux server and on win I
> must use SSH-WIN that it works.
>
> UNfortunately, WIN-SSH is very buggy, it only works if I take the 3des
> algorithm, if I take one of the others (blowf
Re: Oswaldo Mundim: I have one harddisk mounted as primary master and dvd
drive connected as secondary master (normally not mounted)
Re: Johan Vervloet: I'll check it. Btw How can I determine if there is no
partition table errors (assume that fdisk shows everything is ok).
Re: The Crow: Fdisk sh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I MUST :(( tunnel an HTTP stream from a winshit->my linux server and on win I
must use SSH-WIN that it works.
UNfortunately, WIN-SSH is very buggy, it only works if I take the 3des
algorithm, if I take one of the others (blowfish,...) it crashed
12 matches
Mail list logo
