Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
> That's because nessus only checks the version number, and since we
> backported the patch we still have the old version number even though
> we are safe.
CERT tells me Debian potato is vulnerable. We might want to correct them
if they are
The deal with RAID is that it only protects you from hardware failure, not
software failure. If you accidentally delete a file or someone hacks your
machine, the data will be erased from both sides of the mirror.
Personally I think software failure is more likely than hardware (unless you
have tho
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
> That's because nessus only checks the version number, and since we
> backported the patch we still have the old version number even though
> we are safe.
CERT tells me Debian potato is vulnerable. We might want to correct them
if they are
Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> sorry i don't leave known security holes wide open on my boxes. only
> an idiot does that.
If you think your box does not have currently unknown holes you are
naive :)
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROT
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:32:06PM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
>
> Well, on some level, *every* system is vulnerable to scriptkiddies. The
> worst security flaw is admin hubris; always remember that you are not
> immune.
sorry i don't leave known security holes wide open on my boxes. only
an idio
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:28:11PM +0100, eim wrote:
> So I've lost sdb1 and all my important data, but fortunately
> my home dir is still there !
>
> My question is, has somebody any suggestions on how to
> organize personal data, maybe some Real Life examples in
> order to share opinions on a S
Previously Rolf Kutz wrote:
> If you have a linux-fileserver serving binaries for
> linux-workstations, how should it tell?
It won't have any effect then anyway.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally
The deal with RAID is that it only protects you from hardware failure, not
software failure. If you accidentally delete a file or someone hacks your
machine, the data will be erased from both sides of the mirror.
Personally I think software failure is more likely than hardware (unless you
have th
* Quoting Wichert Akkerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Previously Rolf Kutz wrote:
> > If you mount partitions of a different OS or
> > machine, whose programs can't or shouldn't be
> > executed.
>
> Any sane OS will gave a sane error when you do that anyway.
If you have a linux-fileserver serving bin
* Ethan Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011108 07:56]:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > its not, it provides you NO extra security whatsoever, and will break
> > > many many things.
> >
> > It breaks a fair number of scripts t
* Brandon High ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011108 12:25]:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:29:08PM +0100, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> > Is FTP really insecure ?
> > I use a version of ProFtpd.
>
> The protocol is insecure, since it sends login and authentication
> information over the wire in clear text.
...which
On 09.11.2001 00:52 Petter Abrahamsson wrote:
Try gftp, it will do the trick for you
I tried it some time ago (and now again), but it seems to use some
other kind of sftp system we have here... It tries to start sftpserv
from remote machine, and there are none. Instead there are sftp-server
Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> sorry i don't leave known security holes wide open on my boxes. only
> an idiot does that.
If you think your box does not have currently unknown holes you are
naive :)
Wichert.
--
_
[EMAIL PROT
On Thu, 2001-11-08 at 15:25, Jari Eskelinen wrote:
> > > While were on the subject, is there an OpenSSH port of SFTP?
> > openssh has a sftp subsystem, yes.
>
> How about sftp-client with decent (G)UI, is there one (for Linux,
> preferable for Debian)? OpenSSH's sftp-client is pathetic. How you e
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:32:06PM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
>
> Well, on some level, *every* system is vulnerable to scriptkiddies. The
> worst security flaw is admin hubris; always remember that you are not
> immune.
sorry i don't leave known security holes wide open on my boxes. only
an idi
Just curious but how did you lose the data?
I seem to hve run into huge disk prlbems with page defualts
On 8 Nov 2001, eim wrote:
>Date: 08 Nov 2001 22:28:11 +0100
>From: eim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Debian-Security List
>Subject: Hard Disk Organization
>Resent-From: debian-security@lists.de
(2001-11-09) Jari Eskelinen sed :
| > > While were on the subject, is there an OpenSSH port of SFTP?
| > openssh has a sftp subsystem, yes.
|
| How about sftp-client with decent (G)UI, is there one (for Linux,
| preferable for Debian)? OpenSSH's sftp-client is pathetic. How you even
| can up
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:57:22PM -0500, Adam Spickler wrote:
> Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports sftp? Unfortunately,
> I have to use Windows at work. :/
Well, there's always cygwin. It almost makes Windows liveable.
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:55:17PM +0100, Wich
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:28:11PM +0100, eim wrote:
> So I've lost sdb1 and all my important data, but fortunately
> my home dir is still there !
>
> My question is, has somebody any suggestions on how to
> organize personal data, maybe some Real Life examples in
> order to share opinions on a
> While were on the subject, is there an OpenSSH port of SFTP?
openssh has a sftp subsystem, yes.
How about sftp-client with decent (G)UI, is there one (for Linux,
preferable for Debian)? OpenSSH's sftp-client is pathetic. How you even
can upload/download whole subdirectories with it?
--
Jar
There's also putty. Free software that will allow your windows box to ssh into
your linux machine and supports vim syntax coloring.
Mark Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:57:22PM -0500, Adam Spickler wrote:
>> Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports
You can try SecureFX from Van Dyke Technologies, www.vandyke.com I think.
It works pretty well. It supports ftp and sftp.
# Jesse Molina lanner, Snow
# Network Engineer Maximum Charisma Studios Inc.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.303.432.0286
# end of sig
> -Orig
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:57:22PM -0500, Adam Spickler wrote:
> > Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports sftp?
> > Unfortunately, I have to use Windows at work. :/
>
> cygwin includes openssh... and the sftp it has supports everything you
> need.
Or, try Putty:
http://w
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:57:22PM -0500, Adam Spickler wrote:
> Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports sftp? Unfortunately,
> I have to use Windows at work. :/
cygwin includes openssh... and the sftp it has supports everything you
need.
--
Mark Janssen
Previously Rolf Kutz wrote:
> If you have a linux-fileserver serving binaries for
> linux-workstations, how should it tell?
It won't have any effect then anyway.
Wichert.
--
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally
Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports sftp? Unfortunately, I
have to use Windows at work. :/
Thanks,
Adam
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:55:17PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Lars Bjarby wrote:
> > While were on the subject, is there an OpenSSH port of SFTP?
>
> o
Previously Lars Bjarby wrote:
> While were on the subject, is there an OpenSSH port of SFTP?
openssh has a sftp subsystem, yes.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED
At 22:29 2001-11-08, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Is FTP really insecure ?
I use a version of ProFtpd.
A protocol that sends the passwords in clear text is anything but secure.
If you have to use FTP you should probably have diffrent usernames and/or
passwords in the ftpd.
While were on the subject,
* Quoting Wichert Akkerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Previously Rolf Kutz wrote:
> > If you mount partitions of a different OS or
> > machine, whose programs can't or shouldn't be
> > executed.
>
> Any sane OS will gave a sane error when you do that anyway.
If you have a linux-fileserver serving bi
* Ethan Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011108 07:56]:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > its not, it provides you NO extra security whatsoever, and will break
> > > many many things.
> >
> > It breaks a fair number of scripts
Two days ago I've lost all my Personal Data on my Second HDD,
Personal Data like Photos, Images, Audio Stuff, Source Code,
Mails: everything gone...!
I had some Backups fortuneatly but most stuff is lost forever.
Well, now I'm Ready to start my Personal Data Organization from
the begining, I've a
* Brandon High ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011108 12:25]:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:29:08PM +0100, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> > Is FTP really insecure ?
> > I use a version of ProFtpd.
>
> The protocol is insecure, since it sends login and authentication
> information over the wire in clear text.
...which
On 09.11.2001 00:52 Petter Abrahamsson wrote:
> Try gftp, it will do the trick for you
I tried it some time ago (and now again), but it seems to use some
other kind of sftp system we have here... It tries to start sftpserv
from remote machine, and there are none. Instead there are sftp-server
On Thu, 2001-11-08 at 15:25, Jari Eskelinen wrote:
> > > While were on the subject, is there an OpenSSH port of SFTP?
> > openssh has a sftp subsystem, yes.
>
> How about sftp-client with decent (G)UI, is there one (for Linux,
> preferable for Debian)? OpenSSH's sftp-client is pathetic. How you
Just curious but how did you lose the data?
I seem to hve run into huge disk prlbems with page defualts
On 8 Nov 2001, eim wrote:
>Date: 08 Nov 2001 22:28:11 +0100
>From: eim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Debian-Security List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Hard Disk Organization
>Resent-From: [EMA
(2001-11-09) Jari Eskelinen sed :
| > > While were on the subject, is there an OpenSSH port of SFTP?
| > openssh has a sftp subsystem, yes.
|
| How about sftp-client with decent (G)UI, is there one (for Linux,
| preferable for Debian)? OpenSSH's sftp-client is pathetic. How you even
| can u
Previously Rolf Kutz wrote:
> If you mount partitions of a different OS or
> machine, whose programs can't or shouldn't be
> executed.
Any sane OS will gave a sane error when you do that anyway.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:57:22PM -0500, Adam Spickler wrote:
> Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports sftp? Unfortunately, I have
>to use Windows at work. :/
Well, there's always cygwin. It almost makes Windows liveable.
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:55:17PM +0100, Wich
> > While were on the subject, is there an OpenSSH port of SFTP?
> openssh has a sftp subsystem, yes.
How about sftp-client with decent (G)UI, is there one (for Linux,
preferable for Debian)? OpenSSH's sftp-client is pathetic. How you even
can upload/download whole subdirectories with it?
--
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:29:08PM +0100, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Is FTP really insecure ?
> I use a version of ProFtpd.
The protocol is insecure, since it sends login and authentication
information over the wire in clear text.
Different FTP daemons have different security issues.
-B
--
Brandon H
Be more specific about your concerns. The question is, what about it might
be insecure?
The network transport method?
Authentication method?
The daemon to remote exploits?
The daemon for local exploits?
A problem may be related to the specific implementation of the standard, or
the standard its
Is FTP really insecure ?
I use a version of ProFtpd.
Regards
There's also putty. Free software that will allow your windows box to ssh into your
linux machine and supports vim syntax coloring.
Mark Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:57:22PM -0500, Adam Spickler wrote:
>> Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports
You can try SecureFX from Van Dyke Technologies, www.vandyke.com I think.
It works pretty well. It supports ftp and sftp.
# Jesse Molina lanner, Snow
# Network Engineer Maximum Charisma Studios Inc.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED]1.303.432.0286
# end of sig
> -Orig
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:57:22PM -0500, Adam Spickler wrote:
> > Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports sftp? Unfortunately, I
>have to use Windows at work. :/
>
> cygwin includes openssh... and the sftp it has supports everything you
> need.
Or, try Putty:
http://www
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 04:57:22PM -0500, Adam Spickler wrote:
> Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports sftp? Unfortunately, I have
>to use Windows at work. :/
cygwin includes openssh... and the sftp it has supports everything you
need.
--
Mark Janssen
Is there a decent Windows FTP application that supports sftp? Unfortunately, I have
to use Windows at work. :/
Thanks,
Adam
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:55:17PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Lars Bjarby wrote:
> > While were on the subject, is there an OpenSSH port of SFTP?
>
>
Previously Lars Bjarby wrote:
> While were on the subject, is there an OpenSSH port of SFTP?
openssh has a sftp subsystem, yes.
Wichert.
--
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED
At 22:29 2001-11-08, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
>Is FTP really insecure ?
>I use a version of ProFtpd.
A protocol that sends the passwords in clear text is anything but secure.
If you have to use FTP you should probably have diffrent usernames and/or
passwords in the ftpd.
While were on the subject,
Osvaldo Mundim Junior writes:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody knowns what are TOS,PREC,TTL and RES of iptables`s log??
These are fields in IP packets :
TOS stands for Type Of Service
PREC stands for precedence
These one may be usefull to determine priority for packets, but i think
they're not very
Two days ago I've lost all my Personal Data on my Second HDD,
Personal Data like Photos, Images, Audio Stuff, Source Code,
Mails: everything gone...!
I had some Backups fortuneatly but most stuff is lost forever.
Well, now I'm Ready to start my Personal Data Organization from
the begining, I've
Hi,
does anybody knowns what are TOS,PREC,TTL and RES of iptables`s log??
tks
___
Osvaldo
Previously Rolf Kutz wrote:
> If you mount partitions of a different OS or
> machine, whose programs can't or shouldn't be
> executed.
Any sane OS will gave a sane error when you do that anyway.
Wichert.
--
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2001-11-08 16:47 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
EL> What's the use of noexec flag???
WA> Historic thing mostly with very little practical use these days.
At least it's a Good Thing to have around when mounting DOSish floppies
and such to avoid having all files marke
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:29:08PM +0100, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Is FTP really insecure ?
> I use a version of ProFtpd.
The protocol is insecure, since it sends login and authentication
information over the wire in clear text.
Different FTP daemons have different security issues.
-B
--
Brandon
Be more specific about your concerns. The question is, what about it might
be insecure?
The network transport method?
Authentication method?
The daemon to remote exploits?
The daemon for local exploits?
A problem may be related to the specific implementation of the standard, or
the standard it
Is FTP really insecure ?
I use a version of ProFtpd.
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Osvaldo Mundim Junior writes:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody knowns what are TOS,PREC,TTL and RES of iptables`s log??
These are fields in IP packets :
TOS stands for Type Of Service
PREC stands for precedence
These one may be usefull to determine priority for packets, but i think
they're not ver
Hi,
does anybody knowns what are TOS,PREC,TTL and RES of iptables`s log??
tks
___
Osvaldo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> the **unknown* is due to if there is not a correct uid (number) match to a
> username (your login name) in /etc/passwd. I only know this because of a bug
> in the dialy server I use (connectd) which didn't for whatever reason collect
> the correct uid for the user 'nobody'. Obviously somethi
Brian P. Flaherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I found this in my auth.log yesterday and I am puzzeled by it.
>
> Nov 7 00:52:56 localhost PAM_unix[4704]: authentication failure; (uid=0) ->
> **unknown** for passwd service
>
> I don't know how to interpret the (uid=0) -> **unknown** part. I
>
Wichert Akkerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Previously Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> > What's the use of noexec flag???
>
> Historic thing mostly with very little practical use these days.
man mount
- Rolf
Emmanuel Lacour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What's the use of noexec flag???
If you mount partitions of a different OS or
machine, whose programs can't or shouldn't be
executed.
- Rolf
On 2001-11-08 16:47 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
EL> What's the use of noexec flag???
WA> Historic thing mostly with very little practical use these days.
At least it's a Good Thing to have around when mounting DOSish floppies
and such to avoid having all files mark
Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> 1: if your system is vulnerable to script kiddies then admin needs to
>be taken out back and beaten with a large LART.
Sure, but I don't mind having a hopefully completely redundant extra
layer in there.
> 2: if the script kiddie even has 2 tenths of a percent
Hello,
I found this in my auth.log yesterday and I am puzzeled by it.
Nov 7 00:52:56 localhost PAM_unix[4704]: authentication failure; (uid=0) ->
**unknown** for passwd service
I don't know how to interpret the (uid=0) -> **unknown** part. I
don't think I was working as root at the time (in f
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> > its not, it provides you NO extra security whatsoever, and will break
> > many many things.
>
> It breaks a fair number of scripts that script-kiddies use, and as
> such it is somewhat useful.
1
Previously Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> What's the use of noexec flag???
Historic thing mostly with very little practical use these days.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PRO
Ok, thanks for all the comments, I remember have been seen that we could
run a program in a noexec partition like you said. So I will continue
without noexec (and do more stuff on more usefull security tricks). Just
one question:
What's the use of noexec flag???
--
Easter-eggs
> the **unknown* is due to if there is not a correct uid (number) match to a
> username (your login name) in /etc/passwd. I only know this because of a bug
> in the dialy server I use (connectd) which didn't for whatever reason collect
> the correct uid for the user 'nobody'. Obviously someth
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> > its not, it provides you NO extra security whatsoever, and will break
> > many many things.
>
> It breaks a fair number of scripts that script-kiddies use, and as
> such it is somewhat useful.
. FWIW it'll also bre
Brian P. Flaherty [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> I found this in my auth.log yesterday and I am puzzeled by it.
>
> Nov 7 00:52:56 localhost PAM_unix[4704]: authentication failure; (uid=0) ->
>**unknown** for passwd service
>
> I don't know how to interpret the (uid=0) -> **unknown** part. I
Wichert Akkerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Previously Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> > What's the use of noexec flag???
>
> Historic thing mostly with very little practical use these days.
man mount
- Rolf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Emmanuel Lacour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What's the use of noexec flag???
If you mount partitions of a different OS or
machine, whose programs can't or shouldn't be
executed.
- Rolf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> its not, it provides you NO extra security whatsoever, and will break
> many many things.
It breaks a fair number of scripts that script-kiddies use, and as
such it is somewhat useful.
Wichert.
--
___
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:13:05PM +0100, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got an ix86 with woody installed today, made a separate partition
> for /tmp and mounted it noexec (I thinks it's a good Idea...).
its not, it provides you NO extra security whatsoever, and will break
many many things
Previously Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> Is this due to debconf or to the scripts preinst from ntpdate??
You hit bug# 116448 (see http://bugs.debian.org/116448)
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left
Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> 1: if your system is vulnerable to script kiddies then admin needs to
>be taken out back and beaten with a large LART.
Sure, but I don't mind having a hopefully completely redundant extra
layer in there.
> 2: if the script kiddie even has 2 tenths of a percen
Hi,
I've got an ix86 with woody installed today, made a separate partition
for /tmp and mounted it noexec (I thinks it's a good Idea...).
When apt-get installing ntpdate, I got the folowing error:
Can't exec "/tmp/config.4271": Permission denied at
/usr/share/perl/5.6.1/IPC/Open3.pm line 159
...
Hello,
I found this in my auth.log yesterday and I am puzzeled by it.
Nov 7 00:52:56 localhost PAM_unix[4704]: authentication failure; (uid=0) ->
**unknown** for passwd service
I don't know how to interpret the (uid=0) -> **unknown** part. I
don't think I was working as root at the time (in
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:43:56PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> > its not, it provides you NO extra security whatsoever, and will break
> > many many things.
>
> It breaks a fair number of scripts that script-kiddies use, and as
> such it is somewhat useful.
Previously Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> What's the use of noexec flag???
Historic thing mostly with very little practical use these days.
Wichert.
--
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PRO
Ok, thanks for all the comments, I remember have been seen that we could
run a program in a noexec partition like you said. So I will continue
without noexec (and do more stuff on more usefull security tricks). Just
one question:
What's the use of noexec flag???
--
Easter-eggs
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> > its not, it provides you NO extra security whatsoever, and will break
> > many many things.
>
> It breaks a fair number of scripts that script-kiddies use, and as
> such it is somewhat useful.
. FWIW it'll also br
Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> its not, it provides you NO extra security whatsoever, and will break
> many many things.
It breaks a fair number of scripts that script-kiddies use, and as
such it is somewhat useful.
Wichert.
--
__
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:13:05PM +0100, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got an ix86 with woody installed today, made a separate partition
> for /tmp and mounted it noexec (I thinks it's a good Idea...).
its not, it provides you NO extra security whatsoever, and will break
many many thing
Previously Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> Is this due to debconf or to the scripts preinst from ntpdate??
You hit bug# 116448 (see http://bugs.debian.org/116448)
Wichert.
--
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left
Hi,
I've got an ix86 with woody installed today, made a separate partition
for /tmp and mounted it noexec (I thinks it's a good Idea...).
When apt-get installing ntpdate, I got the folowing error:
Can't exec "/tmp/config.4271": Permission denied at
/usr/share/perl/5.6.1/IPC/Open3.pm line 159
..
* Bryan Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.06 05:23:05-0600]:
> Another possibility would be to have them replace the hubs with
> switches, this assumes you are using twisted pair, not thin net
> or thick net.
which is not secure due to arp flooding.
i'll happily give you a POP3 account over
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 04:10:05PM -0800, Gleb Arshinov wrote:
> I am running an up-to-date stable distribution. It looks like it may
> have been hacked yesterday, but I am not sure how.
You might want to run chkrootkit on the machine. It's apt-gettable for
testing and unstable, and downloadab
* Bryan Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.11.06 05:23:05-0600]:
> Another possibility would be to have them replace the hubs with
> switches, this assumes you are using twisted pair, not thin net
> or thick net.
which is not secure due to arp flooding.
i'll happily give you a POP3 account ove
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 04:10:05PM -0800, Gleb Arshinov wrote:
> I am running an up-to-date stable distribution. It looks like it may
> have been hacked yesterday, but I am not sure how.
You might want to run chkrootkit on the machine. It's apt-gettable for
testing and unstable, and downloada
Gleb Arshinov wrote:
I am running an up-to-date stable distribution. It looks like it may
have been hacked yesterday, but I am not sure how.
So, what could have caused ssh/telnet to hang like this while ftp
worked fine? What else should I check for break-in signs? I am
thinking I should re
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011106 05:54]:
> Hallo,
>
>
> > > happen few times that students stole their passwords and so on and mainly
> > > they could steal even teacher's these days.)
> >
> > Can you get a shell account on the outside of your local network?
> > If so SSH over t
94 matches
Mail list logo
