tony mancill, 2001-Oct-20 21:22 -0700:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Marc Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:18:25PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
> > > Just for grins, I removed every udp listing in
> > > /etc/services and restarted inetd and the scan came back the
> > > same. I figure this is
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 09:22:57PM -0700, tony mancill blathered thusly:
> A good way to find out what process is listening on a port is to load the
> lsof package and use "lsof -i" (as root so that you'll see everything).
I find that fuser is more convenient at times - fuser -v -n udp
returns th
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:18:25PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
> > Just for grins, I removed every udp listing in
> > /etc/services and restarted inetd and the scan came back the
> > same. I figure this is normal, but if someone can confirm this
> > behavi
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:18:25PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
> Just for grins, I removed every udp listing in
> /etc/services and restarted inetd and the scan came back the
> same. I figure this is normal, but if someone can confirm this
> behaviour, I'd really appreciate it.
Adding or removing
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 09:22:57PM -0700,
tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Marc Wilson wrote:
>
> > Adding or removing lines in /etc/services doesn't open or close ports...
> > this is a common misconception. Removing what's listening on a particular
> > port i
tony mancill, 2001-Oct-20 21:22 -0700:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Marc Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:18:25PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
> > > Just for grins, I removed every udp listing in
> > > /etc/services and restarted inetd and the scan came back the
> > > same. I figure this i
I'm doing portscans on a system I'm working to learn more about
securing hosts and setting up iptables. My tcp portscan reported
what I expected, only www, ssh and smtp listening. The udp
portscan reported a huge list of 'open' ports. I really didn't
know what to expect for this scan, so I want
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 09:22:57PM -0700, tony mancill blathered thusly:
> A good way to find out what process is listening on a port is to load the
> lsof package and use "lsof -i" (as root so that you'll see everything).
I find that fuser is more convenient at times - fuser -v -n udp
returns t
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:18:25PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
> > Just for grins, I removed every udp listing in
> > /etc/services and restarted inetd and the scan came back the
> > same. I figure this is normal, but if someone can confirm this
> > behav
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:18:25PM -0700, Jeff Coppock wrote:
> Just for grins, I removed every udp listing in
> /etc/services and restarted inetd and the scan came back the
> same. I figure this is normal, but if someone can confirm this
> behaviour, I'd really appreciate it.
Adding or removing
I'm doing portscans on a system I'm working to learn more about
securing hosts and setting up iptables. My tcp portscan reported
what I expected, only www, ssh and smtp listening. The udp
portscan reported a huge list of 'open' ports. I really didn't
know what to expect for this scan, so I want
11 matches
Mail list logo
