On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:02:31PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Is it ok to have your GPG fingerprint publicly available?
Yes.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:02:53PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Is it ok to have your GPG fingerprint publicly available?
>
It is not only OK, but encouraged. If one can confirm that your
fingerprint is valid (i.e. by calling you and saying "is really
your fingerprint?"), then it's a safe bet
Is it ok to have your GPG fingerprint publicly available?
Warren
I seem to be having a small problem with something in the
logcheck.ignore file. The default setup for the logcheck package under
debian already contains this entry in logcheck.ignore to avoid reporting
this common cron job:
/USR/SBIN/CRON\[.*\]: (mail) CMD ( if \[ -x /usr/sbin/exim \]; then
/usr
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:02:31PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Is it ok to have your GPG fingerprint publicly available?
Yes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:02:53PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Is it ok to have your GPG fingerprint publicly available?
>
It is not only OK, but encouraged. If one can confirm that your
fingerprint is valid (i.e. by calling you and saying "is really
your fingerprint?"), then it's a safe bet
Is it ok to have your GPG fingerprint publicly available?
Warren
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seem to be having a small problem with something in the
logcheck.ignore file. The default setup for the logcheck package under
debian already contains this entry in logcheck.ignore to avoid reporting
this common cron job:
/USR/SBIN/CRON\[.*\]: (mail) CMD ( if \[ -x /usr/sbin/exim \]; then
/us
8 matches
Mail list logo