Re: CGI Perl Security

2001-07-24 Thread Jason Thomas
not that I know of, but I would suggest turning on tainted mode and passing all external variables through a regex. my $documentRoot = $ENV{"DOCUMENT_ROOT"}; if (defined($documentRoot)) { # untaint documentRoot $documentRoot =~ m#^([\w_./+:-]+)$#; $documentRoot = $1; } or

Re: CGI Perl Security

2001-07-24 Thread Jason Thomas
not that I know of, but I would suggest turning on tainted mode and passing all external variables through a regex. my $documentRoot = $ENV{"DOCUMENT_ROOT"}; if (defined($documentRoot)) { # untaint documentRoot $documentRoot =~ m#^([\w_./+:-]+)$#; $documentRoot = $1; } or

Re: umask for init

2001-07-24 Thread Dan Hutchinson
Just for further info If you want a whole process in locking up Linux go to www.securityportal.com and Select the Linux tab. In the left hand frame, there should be a section labelled Securing Linux. Follow that to help plug further holes. Dan Hutchinson Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: umask for init

2001-07-24 Thread Dan Hutchinson
Just for further info If you want a whole process in locking up Linux go to www.securityportal.com and Select the Linux tab. In the left hand frame, there should be a section labelled Securing Linux. Follow that to help plug further holes. Dan Hutchinson Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: umask for init

2001-07-24 Thread Nick Name
Thanks everybody, it's nice to have an active security ml Vincenzo Ciancia -- Nick Name - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - UIN 94982698 - Vincenzo Ciancia -

CGI Perl Security

2001-07-24 Thread Leonard Leblanc
Hello Everyone, I'm not quite sure if this is the right place to be posting this, but I am using Debian and it is a security related question. We are currently developing a new website with perl that consists of using the HTML::Template module. In the beginning of this script there are multip

Re: umask for init

2001-07-24 Thread Dan Christensen
Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No need to reboot or restart init, I think. Actually, on second thought, rebooting is probably a good idea, since there are probably lots of processes already running with the wrong umask. Dan

Re: umask for init

2001-07-24 Thread Dan Christensen
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > neh. messing around with what /sbin/init is nasty. better solution > is adding umask 022 to /etc/init.d/rc, using /etc/initscript (im not > totally sure how this works rtfm...) Here is what I put in /etc/initscript, which does the trick according to Ni

Re: umask for init

2001-07-24 Thread Nick Name
Thanks everybody, it's nice to have an active security ml Vincenzo Ciancia -- Nick Name - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - UIN 94982698 - Vincenzo Ciancia - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CGI Perl Security

2001-07-24 Thread Leonard Leblanc
Hello Everyone, I'm not quite sure if this is the right place to be posting this, but I am using Debian and it is a security related question. We are currently developing a new website with perl that consists of using the HTML::Template module. In the beginning of this script there are multi

Re: umask for init

2001-07-24 Thread Dan Christensen
Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No need to reboot or restart init, I think. Actually, on second thought, rebooting is probably a good idea, since there are probably lots of processes already running with the wrong umask. Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: umask for init

2001-07-24 Thread Dan Christensen
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > neh. messing around with what /sbin/init is nasty. better solution > is adding umask 022 to /etc/init.d/rc, using /etc/initscript (im not > totally sure how this works rtfm...) Here is what I put in /etc/initscript, which does the trick according to N

Out of Office AutoReply: Sea-River

2001-07-24 Thread Weynants Michel
Dear all, I will be on vacation from Monday 16/07/01 and be back on Monday 30/07/01. M. Weynants

Abwesenheitsnotiz: Sea-River

2001-07-24 Thread Thomas Nesges
Ich bin zur Zeit nicht im Hause und ab dem 06.08.2001 wieder unter dieser Adresse erreichbar. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an meine Vertretung Sander Jones, der unter +49 (0) 651 8247 0 erreichbar ist. E-Mail-Adresse: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thomas Nesges

Out of Office AutoReply: Sea-River

2001-07-24 Thread BRADETICH,RYAN \(HP-Boise,ex1\)
I am currently out of the office from July 24th - July 30th. I will be returning on July 31st. If you need assistance, please contact Paul Frohardt (396-5039) or James Hatmaker (396-7936) . Thanks, - Ryan

Sea-River

2001-07-24 Thread Sea-River
Title: Untitled Document Bonjour, vous aimez la pêche et le milieu aquatique ? Hi, you like the fishing and the environment ? Gratuit, chaque semaine en français : La Lettre de Sea-River Gratuit, chaque mois : La Lettre européenne de Sea-River Free, every month : The

Out of Office AutoReply: Sea-River

2001-07-24 Thread Weynants Michel
Dear all, I will be on vacation from Monday 16/07/01 and be back on Monday 30/07/01. M. Weynants -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Abwesenheitsnotiz: Sea-River

2001-07-24 Thread Thomas Nesges
Ich bin zur Zeit nicht im Hause und ab dem 06.08.2001 wieder unter dieser Adresse erreichbar. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an meine Vertretung Sander Jones, der unter +49 (0) 651 8247 0 erreichbar ist. E-Mail-Adresse: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thomas Nesges -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Out of Office AutoReply: Sea-River

2001-07-24 Thread BRADETICH,RYAN (HP-Boise,ex1)
I am currently out of the office from July 24th - July 30th. I will be returning on July 31st. If you need assistance, please contact Paul Frohardt (396-5039) or James Hatmaker (396-7936) . Thanks, - Ryan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Sea-River

2001-07-24 Thread Sea-River
Title: Untitled Document Bonjour, vous aimez la pêche et le milieu aquatique ? Hi, you like the fishing and the environment ? Gratuit, chaque semaine en français : La Lettre de Sea-River Gratuit, chaque mois : La Lettre européenne de Sea-River Free, every month : The

Re: umask for init

2001-07-24 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:24:41AM +0200, Nick Name wrote: > More seriously, a quick fix could be, if you can't switch back 2.2.19 or > go forward 2.4.7, to mv /sbin/init /sbin/good_init and put in /sbin/init > a script like this, everything is untested of course: > > #!/bin/sh > umask 022 > exe

Re: iptables logging

2001-07-24 Thread Rich Rudnick
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:27:06 dude wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Jeff Coppock wrote: > > > > > > > iptables -A log -j LOG --log-prefix "Rejected: " # be verbose in syslog > > > iptables -A log -j delete # hand over package to "delete" > > > > > > What more information does log prefix add to

Re: umask for init

2001-07-24 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:24:41AM +0200, Nick Name wrote: > More seriously, a quick fix could be, if you can't switch back 2.2.19 or > go forward 2.4.7, to mv /sbin/init /sbin/good_init and put in /sbin/init > a script like this, everything is untested of course: > > #!/bin/sh > umask 022 > ex