/usr/bin/Mail buffer 0verfl0w ????

There is some discussion about possible /usr/bin/Mail buffer overflow. The link is from http://lwn.net/2001/0308/security.php3 http://securityfocus.com/frames/?content=/templates/archive.pike%3Flist%3D82%26threads%3D1%26end%3D2001-03-03%26tid%3D166333%26fromthread%3D0%26start%3D2001-02-25%26 Las

Re: promiscuous eth0

This is really goofy. But I've been able to (at least in my case) narrow the "problem" down to using Xircom cards. The 3Com card that I use in my other Debian laptop works great (switching between the two demonstrates this behavior as well, so it isn't the laptop, and the 3Com card is Cardbu

Re: promiscuous eth0

On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Jaan Sarv wrote: > > Also, paranoid network administrators might be a little upset by it, since > > Linux sends out a frame indicating it is switching into (or out > > of) promiscuous mode. This is possible evidence that you're running a > > sniffer of some kind (such as snort)

Re: promiscuous eth0

This is really goofy. But I've been able to (at least in my case) narrow the "problem" down to using Xircom cards. The 3Com card that I use in my other Debian laptop works great (switching between the two demonstrates this behavior as well, so it isn't the laptop, and the 3Com card is Cardbu

Re: promiscuous eth0

On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Jaan Sarv wrote: > > Also, paranoid network administrators might be a little upset by it, since > > Linux sends out a frame indicating it is switching into (or out > > of) promiscuous mode. This is possible evidence that you're running a > > sniffer of some kind (such as snort

Re: kernel patches

On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 05:04:17PM +0100, Niklas Höglund wrote: > Anyone know where I can find a kernel patch that restricts users so.. > 'who' shows only the user himself http://www.openwall.com/linux/ > 'netstat -a' only ports that root/the user owns Openwall can set access rights for /proc

kernel patches

Hi! Anyone know where I can find a kernel patch that restricts users so.. 'who' shows only the user himself 'netstat -a' only ports that root/the user owns 'ls' only files that are owned by root/the user ?? //Niklas

Re: howto check the integrity of installed packets

The integrity of the files installed can be found in tripwire and aide, that checksums the selected files into a database... its not the same you ask but can be usefull... On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Alexander Reelsen wrote: Hi On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 03:34:14PM +0100, Jörgen Persson wro

Re: howto check the integrity of installed packets

Hi On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 03:34:14PM +0100, Jörgen Persson wrote: > the subject is clear enough... I'm looking for ''native'' support for > checking the integrity of installed packets. You might want to try the package 'debsums'. However those files are easy to change, but perhaps it's a start i

howto check the integrity of installed packets

Well, the subject is clear enough... I'm looking for ''native'' support for checking the integrity of installed packets. Jörgen

Re: kernel patches

On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 05:04:17PM +0100, Niklas Höglund wrote: > Anyone know where I can find a kernel patch that restricts users so.. > 'who' shows only the user himself http://www.openwall.com/linux/ > 'netstat -a' only ports that root/the user owns Openwall can set access rights for /proc

kernel patches

Hi! Anyone know where I can find a kernel patch that restricts users so.. 'who' shows only the user himself 'netstat -a' only ports that root/the user owns 'ls' only files that are owned by root/the user ?? //Niklas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: howto check the integrity of installed packets

The integrity of the files installed can be found in tripwire and aide, that checksums the selected files into a database... its not the same you ask but can be usefull... On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Alexander Reelsen wrote: Hi On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 03:34:14PM +0100, Jörgen Persson wr

Re: howto check the integrity of installed packets

Hi On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 03:34:14PM +0100, Jörgen Persson wrote: > the subject is clear enough... I'm looking for ''native'' support for > checking the integrity of installed packets. You might want to try the package 'debsums'. However those files are easy to change, but perhaps it's a start

howto check the integrity of installed packets

Well, the subject is clear enough... I'm looking for ''native'' support for checking the integrity of installed packets. Jörgen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: your mail

On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 01:18:20AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DLINUX -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -D__NO_VERSION__ > -I/usr/include -I. -O2 -pipe -DCONFIG_PROC_FS -DIANS -DIANS_BASE_VLAN_TAGGING ^^ That should probably be -I/usr/src/linux/include. You need to

Re:

leider hab ich das schon als root versucht zu installieren! of course i tried it as root! mfg -- mei gehts mia heit wida guat Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net

Re:

hi hmm.. > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DLINUX -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -D__NO_VERSION__ > -I/usr/include -I. -O2 -pipe -DCONFIG_PROC_FS -DIANS -DIANS_BASE_VLAN_TAGGING > -DIANS_BASE_VLAN_ID -c -o ans.o ans.c > Assembler messages: > FATAL: Can't create ans.o: Permission denied > In file included from ans

Re:

leider hab ich das schon als root versucht zu installieren! of course i tried it as root! mfg -- mei gehts mia heit wida guat Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]