Bradley M Alexander wrote:
> Fortunately, that is the vast minority of the hacker community. But the
> true professionals are probably not gunning for your home machine.
> Ordinarily they are the ones that are doing industrial espionage,
> intelligence etc. Not hacking home machines. However, secu
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 08:37:09AM +, sena wrote:
> Hi...
>
> I've used PMFirewall for a long time to create my ipchains rules...
>
> Recently, I've switched to rc.firewall.
>
> Can you give feedback on what utility of this kind (if any) are you using on
> your machine(s), or have you used i
Bradley M Alexander wrote:
> Fortunately, that is the vast minority of the hacker community. But the
> true professionals are probably not gunning for your home machine.
> Ordinarily they are the ones that are doing industrial espionage,
> intelligence etc. Not hacking home machines. However, sec
I was just browsing through the Linux Security HOWTO for tips on further
securing my new firewall/router when I came across the following.
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Security-HOWTO-5.html
The /var/log/wtmp and /var/run/utmp files contain the login records for
all users on your system. Their int
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 08:37:09AM +, sena wrote:
> Hi...
>
> I've used PMFirewall for a long time to create my ipchains rules...
>
> Recently, I've switched to rc.firewall.
>
> Can you give feedback on what utility of this kind (if any) are you using on
> your machine(s), or have you used
Am Montag, 15. Januar 2001 23:06 schrieb Alexander Hvostov:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get the `limit' match support in iptables/netfilter to be
> inverted in the sense that it only matches when the limit has been
> exceeded. For instance, to log a flood:
>
> iptables -I INPUT -m limit ! --limit 1/
I was just browsing through the Linux Security HOWTO for tips on further
securing my new firewall/router when I came across the following.
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Security-HOWTO-5.html
The /var/log/wtmp and /var/run/utmp files contain the login records for
all users on your system. Their in
Hello,
I'm trying to get the `limit' match support in iptables/netfilter to be
inverted in the sense that it only matches when the limit has been
exceeded. For instance, to log a flood:
iptables -I INPUT -m limit ! --limit 1/s -j LOG
However, for some reason, the `!' flag does not seem to change
Am Montag, 15. Januar 2001 23:06 schrieb Alexander Hvostov:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get the `limit' match support in iptables/netfilter to be
> inverted in the sense that it only matches when the limit has been
> exceeded. For instance, to log a flood:
>
> iptables -I INPUT -m limit ! --limit 1
Hello,
I'm trying to get the `limit' match support in iptables/netfilter to be
inverted in the sense that it only matches when the limit has been
exceeded. For instance, to log a flood:
iptables -I INPUT -m limit ! --limit 1/s -j LOG
However, for some reason, the `!' flag does not seem to chang
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 10:10:08AM +0100, V. Achiaga wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> > What u mean debian-specific patch?
>
> I only want to mean a patch including the patch.diff file, or an
> official debian package (.deb file)
if debian is vulnerable then a updated package should indeed be placed
in se
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 10:10:08AM +0100, V. Achiaga wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> > What u mean debian-specific patch?
>
> I only want to mean a patch including the patch.diff file, or an
> official debian package (.deb file)
if debian is vulnerable then a updated package should indeed be placed
in s
> Hey,
> What u mean debian-specific patch?
I only want to mean a patch including the patch.diff file, or an
official debian package (.deb file)
> > I know there's a debian package of lprng, but I don't know if the patch
> > you're talking about is applied to this package, I guess you should
Title: RE: port-scanning. advise?
I'm very sorry about the html-mail I just sent, i'll never happen again.
I think i hate this place, running outlook and other crap. =)
Here's the mail again so everyone can read it. =)
Jeje, whatever.
-Original Message-
From: Johan Segernas [ma
Title: RE: port-scanning. advise?
> > What makes me curious is the fact that no ip came from the same
> > geographical area. Literraly the ips resolved to machines
> from all the
> > continents of the world! As if I was under global attack! :-)
> > Of course these could be spoofed, but sure
> Hey,
> What u mean debian-specific patch?
I only want to mean a patch including the patch.diff file, or an
official debian package (.deb file)
> > I know there's a debian package of lprng, but I don't know if the patch
> > you're talking about is applied to this package, I guess you should
Title: RE: port-scanning. advise?
I'm very sorry about the html-mail I just sent, i'll never happen again.
I think i hate this place, running outlook and other crap. =)
Here's the mail again so everyone can read it. =)
Jeje, whatever.
-Original Message-
From: Johan Segernas [ma
Title: RE: port-scanning. advise?
> > What makes me curious is the fact that no ip came from the same
> > geographical area. Literraly the ips resolved to machines
> from all the
> > continents of the world! As if I was under global attack! :-)
> > Of course these could be spoofed, but sure
18 matches
Mail list logo
